Skip to main content
Log in

Data Transmission Using K-Means Clustering in Low Power Wide Area Networks with Mobile Edge Cloud

  • Published:
Wireless Personal Communications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Low-power, long-range wireless communication has become important for IoT applications in wide space. A Low-Power Wide Area Network (LPWAN) has been proposed to support wireless communication. It provides very long communication distances with low data rates and uses a very simple transmission mechanism to deliver data packets over long distances. The simple transmission mechanism does not consider device characteristics according to generated data. If priority according to the device characteristics is considered during data transmission, the transmission efficiency of each service can be improved. Therefore, this paper proposes data transmission considering device characteristics. The proposed method employs a k-means clustering algorithm to classify devices according to the traffic characteristic. Each group of classified devices has different priority, and the wireless channel access time is determined by that priority. Using different channel access times according to priority allows end-devices to avoid collisions and improve transmission efficiency in LPWAN with long delay. The proposed method is compared to typical transmission methods in an LPWAN through the performance evaluation by computer simulations and its transmission efficiency is validated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Each end-device can generate three types of data: event-driven, periodic, and urgent. End-device characteristics can be defined according to the generated data characteristics.

References

  1. Gubbi, J., Buyya, R., Marusic, S., & Palaniswami, M. (2013). Internet of Things (IoT): A vision, architectural elements, and future directions. Elsevier Future Generation Computer Systems, 29(7), 1645–1660.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Gunes, V., Peter, S., Givargis, T., & Vahid, F. (2014). A survey on concepts, applications, and challenges in cyber-physical systems. KSII Transactions on Internet Information Systems, 8(12), 4242–4267.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bandyopadhyay, D., & Sen, J. (2011). Internet of things: Applications and challenges in technology and standardization. Springer Wireless Personal Communications, 55(1), 49–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Kim, S., & Na, W. (2016). Safe data transmission architecture based on cloud for Internet of things. Springer Wireless Personal Communications, 86(1), 287–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Kim, D.-Y., & Kim, S. (2017). Dual-channel medium access control of low power wide area networks considering traffic characteristics in IoE. Springer Cluster Computing—The Journal of Networks, Software Tools and Applications, 20(3), 2375–2384.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kim, D.-Y., & Jung, M. (2017). Data transmission and network architecture in long range low power sensor networks for IoT. Springer Wireless Personal Communications, 93(1), 119–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Chen, M., Wan, J., & Li, F. (2012). Machine-to-machine communications: Architectures, standards and applications. KSII Transactions on Internet Information Systems, 6(2), 480–497.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Goudos, S. K., Dallas, P. I., Chatziefthymiou, S., & Kyriazakos, S. (2017). A survey of IoT key enabling and future technologies: 5G, mobile IoT, sematic web and applications. Springer Wireless Personal Communications, 97(2), 1645–1675.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Sornin, N., Luis, M., Eirich, T., Kramp, T., & Hersent, O. (2016). LoRaWAN specification. Lora Alliance LoRaWAN Specification, Release v1.0.2.

  10. Augustin, A., Yi, J., Clausen, T., & Townsley, W. M. (2016). A study of LoRa: Long range & low power networks for the Internet of things. MDPI Sensors, 16(9), 1466.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Adelantado, F., Vilajosana, X., Tuset-Peiro, P., Martinez, B., Melia-Segul, J., & Watteyne, T. (2017). Understanding the limits of LoRaWAN. IEEE Communications Magazine, 55(9), 34–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Raza, U., Kulkarni, P., & Sooriyabandara, M. (2017). Low power wide area networks: An overview. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 19(2), 855–873.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Petäjäjärvi, J., Mikhaylov, K., Pettissalo, M., Janhunen, J., & Iinatti, J. (2017). Performance of a low-power wide-area network based on LoRa technology: Doppler robustness, scalability, and coverage. International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks, 13(3), 1550147717699412.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Centenaro, M., Vangelista, L., Zanella, A., & Zorzi, M. (2016). Long-range communications in unlicensed bands: the rising stars in the IoT and smart city scenarios. IEEE Wireless Communications, 23(5), 60–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Beck, M.T., Werner, M., Feld, S., & Schimper, T. (2014). Mobile edge computing: A taxonomy. In The 6th International Conference on Advances in Future Internet (AFIN) (pp. 48–54).

  16. Hu, Y.C., Patel, M., Sabella, D., Sprecher, N., & Young, V. (2015). Mobile computing—a key technology towards 5G. ETSI White Paper, no. 11.

  17. Frank, H., Fuhrmann W., & Ghita, B. (2016). Mobile edge computing: Requirements for powerful mobile near real-time applications. In The 11th International Network Conference (INC) (pp. 63–66).

  18. Ahmed, A., Ahmed, E. (2016). A survey on mobile edge computing. In The 10th IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Systems and Control (ISCO).

  19. Marsland, S. (2014). Machine learning—An algorithmic perspective. USA: Chapman and Hall/CRC Press, New York.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  20. Harrington, P. (2012). Machine learning in action. Shelter Island: Manning publications.

    Google Scholar 

  21. MacDougall, M. H. (1987). Simulating computer systems—techniques and tool. Cambridge: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Ross, S. M. (2001). Probability models for computer science. Orlando: Harcourt/Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Trivedi, K. S. (2002). Probability and statistics with reliability, queuing and computer science applications. Chichester: Wiley.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Education (NRF-2016R1D1A1B03931406), and this work was supported by the Soonchunhyang University Research Fund.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Seokhoon Kim.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kim, DY., Kim, S. Data Transmission Using K-Means Clustering in Low Power Wide Area Networks with Mobile Edge Cloud. Wireless Pers Commun 105, 567–581 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-018-5742-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-018-5742-1

Keywords

Navigation