Skip to main content
Log in

Recent Advances in MAC Protocols for the Energy Harvesting Based WSN: A Comprehensive Review

  • Published:
Wireless Personal Communications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Wireless sensor networks are catching the attention of the researchers in various fields like structural, healthcare monitoring, but the real world adoption is getting difficult due to its dependence on the battery power, so energy harvesting comes to its rescue. To utilize the harvested energy in the best manner, MAC protocols which control the transreceiver in a node are presented here. They are different from the battery powered WSN where the focus is on increasing the lifetime of the nodes, rather these protocols focus on improving the quality of the network. With optimal tradeoff between the infinite network lifetime and energy availability, MAC protocols need to be redesigned for energy harvesting based wireless sensor networks (EHWSN). In this paper first EH technology in wireless sensor networks is discussed. Then a survey of EH based MAC protocols is done in a classified manner. The comparison of the protocols is done based on the different metrics such as energy conservation factor, scalability, latency etc. State of the art literature survey is presented so that users have consolidated data to pick up the one based on their application requirement. Challenges specific to applications is presented along with the various gaps to give an insight into the future research directions. To the best of the author’s knowledge, review of all the EHWSN MAC protocols is not reported till date.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Fafoutis, X., Di Mauro, A., Vithanage, M. D., & Dragoni, N. (2015). Receiver-initiated medium access control protocols for wireless sensor networks. Computer Networks, 76, 55–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Fafoutis, X., & Dragoni, N. (2012). Analytical comparison of MAC schemes for energy harvesting wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings 9th international conference on networked sensing systems (INSS) (pp. 1–6).

  3. More, A., & Raisinghani, V. (2017). A node failure and battery-aware coverage protocol for wireless sensor networks. Computers & Electrical Engineering, 64, 200–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Yoo, H., Shim, M., & Kim, D. (2012). Dynamic duty-cycle scheduling schemes for energy-harvesting wireless sensor networks. IEEE Communications Letters, 16(2), 202–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Cirstea, C., Cernaianu, M.,& Gontean, A. (2012). Packet loss analysis in wireless sensor networks routing protocols. In 2012 35th international conference telecommunication signal processing (pp. 37–41), January 2016.

  6. Ramezani, P. (2015). Overview of MAC protocols for energy harvesting wireless sensor networks. In IEEE 26th international symposium on “personal, indoor and mobile radio communications (PIMRC): Mobile and wireless networks overview” (pp. 2032–2037).

  7. Del Testa, D., Marin, G., & Peretti, G. (2013). Comparison of MAC techniques for energy harvesting wireless sensor networks. Wireless systems and networks, March 2013.

  8. Kosunalp, S. (2015). MAC Protocols for Energy Harvesting Wireless Sensor Networks: Survey. ETRI Journal, 37(4), 804–812.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Tan, L., & Tang, S. (2017). Energy harvesting wireless sensor node with temporal death: Novel models and analyses. IEEE/ACM Trans. Netw., 25(2), 896–909.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Tang, S., & Tan, L. (2017). Reward Rate Maximization and Optimal Transmission Policy of EH Device With Temporal Death in EH-WSNs. IEE Trans. Wirel. Commun., 16(2), 1157–1167.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Eu, Z. A., Tan, H.-P., & Seah, W. K. G. (2011). Design and performance analysis of MAC schemes for Wireless Sensor Networks Powered by Ambient Energy Harvesting. Ad Hoc Networks, 9(3), 300–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Fujii, C. & Seah, W. K. G. (2011). Multi-tier probabilistic polling in Wireless Sensor Networks powered by energy harvesting. In Proceedings of the 2011 7th International Conference on Intelligent Sensors, Sensor Networks and Information Processing, ISSNIP (pp. 383–388).

  13. Fafoutis, X., & Dragoni, N. (2011). ODMAC : An on-demand MAC protocol for energy harvesting—wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of the 8th ACM symposium on Performance evaluation of wireless ad hoc, sensor, and ubiquitous networks (pp. 49–56).

  14. Amgoth, T., & Jana, P. K. (2015). Energy-aware algorithm for wireless sensor networks. Computers & Electrical Engineering, 41, 357–367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Kim, S. C., Jeon, J. H., & Park, H. J. (2012). QoS aware energy-efficient (QAEE) MAC protocol for energy harvesting wireless sensor networks. In G. Lee, D. Howard, J. J. Kang & D. Ślęzak (Eds.), Convergence and hybrid information technology. ICHIT 2012. Lecture notes in computer science (Vol. 7425). Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Eu, Z. A., & Tan, H. P. (2012). Probabilistic polling for multi-hop energy harvesting wireless sensor networks. IEEE international conference on communications (ICC) (pp. 271–275).

  17. Fafoutis, X., & Dragoni, N. (2012). Adaptive media access control for energy harvesting—Wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of 9th international. conference on networked sensor systems (pp. 1–4).

  18. Jha, M. K., Pandey, A. K., Pal, D., & Mohan, A. (2011). An energy-efficient multi-layer MAC (ML-MAC) protocol for wireless sensor networks. AEU-International Journal of Electronics and Communications, 5(3), 209–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Adnan, M. T., & Datta, S. (2013). AdAMAC: A new MAC protocol for high traffic wireless netwoRks. Procedia Computer Science, 19, 313–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Nergy, H. A. E., Mac, D., Lee, H., Lee, M., & Lee, T. (2015). Harvested energy-adaptive mac protocol for energy harvesting IoT networks. In IEEE 7th international conference on networks & communications (pp. 51–58).

  21. Nguyen, K., Nguyen, V., Le, D., Ji, Y., Duong, D. A., & Yamada, S. (2014). ERI-MAC : An energy-harvested receiver-initiated MAC protocol for wireless sensor networks. International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks, 2014, 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Lin, H. H., Shih, M. J., Wei, H. Y., & Vannithamby, R. (2014). DeepSleep: IEEE 802.11 enhancement for energy-harvesting machine-to-machine communications. Wireless Networks, 21(2), 357–370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Liu, H., He, W., & Seah, W. K. G. (2014). LEB-MAC : Load and energy balancing MAC protocol for energy harvesting powered wireless sensor networks. In IEEE international conference on parallel and distributed systems (ICPADS), December 2014.

  24. Seah, W. K. G., Seah, W. K. G., Eu, Z. A., & Tan, H. (2009). Wireless Sensor Networks Powered by Ambient Energy Harvesting (WSN-HEAP) - Survey and Challenges. Wireless VITAE, Aalborg, Denmark, 17–20, 1–5.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Jin,Y.,& Tan, H. P. (2014). Optimal performance trade-offs in MAC for wireless sensor networks powered by heterogeneous ambient energy harvesting. In FIP networking conference.

  26. Oller, J., Demirkol, I., Casademont, J., Paradells, J., Gamm, G. U., & Reindl, L. (2016). Has Time Come to Switch From Duty-Cycled MAC Protocols to Wake-Up Radio for Wireless Sensor Networks? IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking, 24(2), 674–687.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Liu, W., Zhou, X., Durrani, S., Mehrpouyan, H., & Blostein, S. D. (2016). Energy harvesting wireless sensor networks: Delay analysis considering energy costs of sensing and transmission. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communication, 15(7), 4635–4650.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Razaque, A., & Elleithy, K. (2014). Energy-efficient boarder node medium access control protocol for wireless sensor networks. Sensors, 14(3), 5074–5117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Felemban, E., & Sheikh, A. A. (2014). A review on mobile and sensor networks innovations in intelligent transportation systems. Journal of Transportation Technologies, 4(July), 196–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Vogt, H. (2009). Protocols for secure communication in wireless sensor networks. Ph.D. thesis, Swiss Fed. Inst. Technol., Zurich.

  31. Chen, W., Chen, L., Chen, Z., & Tu, S. (2006). WITS: A wireless sensor network for intelligent transportation system. In 1st international multi-symposiums on computer and computational sciences (pp. 635–641).

  32. Yi, J. M., Kang, M. J., & Noh, D. K. (2015). SolarCastalia: Solar energy harvesting wireless sensor network simulator. International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks, 2015, 415174.

  33. Ozel, O., Tutuncuoglu, K., Ulukus, S., & Yener, A. (2015). Fundamental limits of energy harvesting communications. IEEE Communications Magazine, 53(4), 126–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Preeti Singh.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kaur, P., Sohi, B.S. & Singh, P. Recent Advances in MAC Protocols for the Energy Harvesting Based WSN: A Comprehensive Review. Wireless Pers Commun 104, 423–440 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-018-6028-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-018-6028-3

Keywords