Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Network Selection for Maximum Coverage using Regression Analysis in Deep Fading Environment

  • Published:
Wireless Personal Communications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The paper focuses on the seamless transmission of the medical data between two points of e-health ecosystem. To successfully transmit the data one need to have a reliable network with required minimum signal strength and distortion. Based on system performance and its stability in accordance with the network, there are certain and quick variations in the network that could lead to distortion of data. The variation of signal strength during observation ranges in between − 90 and − 185 dBm. Transmission of signals from the basement to other location needs minimum threshold signal − 147 dBm for transfer of data with suitable speed. During analysis it was observed that some of the networks are not able to respond in deep fading environment, i.e., for basement signal transmission due to their installation criterion. The medical data transmitted from the basement need suitable selection of network in the given area. The above parameters are applied to the few hospitals in Greater Noida. UP (India) where the readings were taken at their respective basements to represent the signal strength with its fading parameters. Normally the basement fading tends to 25–35 dB in case of reception. The selection criteria in this paper is based on signal strength measurement, coverage analysis and regression analysis, prevail, that Worldwide Interoperability for Microwave Access is the best suited network for transmission of medical data from one place to another place with minimum cost.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Salam, H. A., & Khan, B. M. (2015). Use of wireless system in healthcare for developing countries. Data Communications and Networks, 2(1), 253–264.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Wu, T., Redouté, J. M., & Yuce, M. R. (2017). An autonomous wireless body area network implementation towards IoT connected Healthcare applications. IEEE Access Journal, 5(1), 11413–11422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Amin, R., Islam, S. H., Biswas, G. P., & Khan, M. K. (2018). A robust and anonymous patient monitoring system using wireless medical sensor networks. Future Generation Computer System, 80, 483–495. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2016.05.032.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. IEEE Engineering In Medicine And Biology Society. (2012) ISO/IEEE Standard 11073: Health informaticsPOC medical device communicationPart 00101: Guidelines for the use of RF wireless technology.

  5. Punj, R., & Kumar, R. (2018). Technological aspects of WBANs for health monitoring: A comprehensive review. Wireless Networks, 24(152), 1–33.

    Google Scholar 

  6. MathWorks, I. (2012). MATLAB and statistics toolbox release.

  7. Aalamifar, F., & Lampe, L. (2017). Optimized WiMAX profile configuration for smart grid communications. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 8(6), 2723–2732.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Sharma, S., & Singh, B. (2013). Experimental study of a fixed WiMAX network at 2.62 Ghz. Wireless Personal Communications, 72(4), 2127–2141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Dalela, C., Prasad, M. V. S. N., & Dalela, P. K. (2012). Some experimental investigation in the WiMAX band comparison of propagation models in mixed urban environments of Western India. Annals Of Telecommunication, 67, 255–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Prasad, M. V. S. N., Ratnamala, K., & Dalela, P. K. (2010). Mobile communication measurements along railroads and model evolutions over eastern-Indian rural regions. IEEE Antennas and Propagation Magazine, 52(5), 131–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Nguyen, T. H., Nguyen, T., Yoo, M. (2018). Analysis of deployment approaches for virtual customer premises equipment. In International conference on information networking (ICOIN 2018), Chiang Mai, Thailand.

  12. Sharma, S., & Singh, B. (2013). WiMAX network for capacity and coverage assessment. Wireless Personal Communications, 75, 1573–1586.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Sharma, S., & Singh, B. (2012). Coverage analysis of WiMAX network. Journal of Bioinformatics and Intelligent Control, 1(1), 114–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Alqudah, Y. A. (2012). Path loss modelling based on field measurements using deployed 3.5 GHz WiMAX network. Wireless Personal Communication, 69, 793–803.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Liu, J., Sheng, M., Liu, L., & Li, J. (2017). Effect of densification on cellularnetwork performance with bounded path loss model. IEEE Communications Letters, 21(2), 346–349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Prasad, M. V. S. N., Dalela, P. K., & Singh, R. (2005). A comparison of land mobile radio prediction methods in Indian rural zones. In: IEEE international conference on personal wireless communications (ICPWC 2005), New Delhi, India.

  17. Prasad, M. V. S. N., & Singh, R. (2003). Terrestrial mobile communication train measurements in Western India. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 52(1), 671–681.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Amali, C., Jayaprakash, D., & Ramachandran, B. (2017). An analytical solution based on mobilityand multicriteria optimization for access selection in heterogeneous environment. Sadhana, 42(11), 1871–1882.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Choi, H. H. (2015). Ad hoc cooperative vertical handover for next-generation Heterogeneous network. AEU-International Journal of Electronics and Communications, 69(10), 1557–1561.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Elhadj, H. B., Elias, J., Chaari, L., & Kamoun, L. (2016). Multi-attribute decision making handover algorithm for wireless body area networks. Computer Communications, 81(1), 97–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Sharma, S., & Singh, B. (2014). Optimising capacity-coverage of a fixed WiMaX network. IET Microwaves, Antennas and Propagation, 8(10), 708–713.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Han, K., & Huang, K. (2017). Wirelessly powered backscatter communication networks: modeling, coverage, and capacity. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 16(4), 2548–2561.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Xiaonan, W., Deguang, L., & Yufeng, Y. (2015). A cross-layer mobility handover scheme for IPv6-based vehicular networks. AEU-International Journal of Electronics and Communications, 69(10), 1514–1524.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Yadav, P., Agrawal, R., & Komal, Kashish. (2018). Performance evaluation of ad hoc wireless local area network in telemedicine applications. Journal of Procedia Computer Science, 125(1), 267–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Theodore, S. R. (2007). Wireless communications (2nd ed.). New Delhi: Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Piyush Yadav.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yadav, P., Agrawal, R. Network Selection for Maximum Coverage using Regression Analysis in Deep Fading Environment. Wireless Pers Commun 106, 1057–1074 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-019-06203-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-019-06203-6

Keywords