Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Performance Comparison of 2.4 and 5 GHz WiFi Signals and Proposing a New Method for Mobile Indoor Positioning

  • Published:
Wireless Personal Communications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Nowadays, the location information of people and objects is a necessity for indoor environments. Therefore, many technologies, methods, and algorithms have been employed in recent years to estimate the positions of people and objects. Although there has been much research into different methods, none of these methods has yet been accepted as a common solution for accurate indoor positioning. Therefore, there is still a lot of work to be done in this area of research. WiFi-based indoor positioning applications are one of the most popular research topics due to not requiring any additional hardware or cost. However, WiFi signals are influenced by many environmental effects, and thus, they show unstable behaviors in indoor environments. Because of the fluctuation of WiFi signal behavior, WiFi-based systems cannot provide sub-meter level accurate solutions. In this paper, we aimed at two main contributions. First, we analyzed and compared the 2.4 and 5 GHz WiFi signal behaviors based on the distance. For this purpose, we conducted an experiment using access points along a 27.83 m corridor with 0.605 m intervals in an indoor environment. This experiment showed that the 5 GHz WiFi signal behaviors are more stable than the 2.4 GHz signals. For this reason, it is expected that 5 GHz WiFi signals enable more accurate distance and position information as compared to the 2.4 GHz signals. Secondly, we performed six real-time kinematic experiments on two different trajectories with two main objectives. The first objective was to compare the positioning performances of 2.4 and 5 GHz WiFi signals. As expected from the first experiment results, positioning accuracies obtained from 5 GHz signals are significantly better than 2.4 GHz signals. In the second objective, we proposed a new algorithm that mainly consists of a fusion of the Bilateration and extended Kalman filter (EKF) algorithms. The main purpose of this algorithm is to diminish the effects of faulty received signal strength values on positioning, and therefore, improve the positioning accuracy of the mobile devices. It concluded that the proposed algorithm dramatically improves the positioning accuracy as compared to the Bilateration and EKF algorithms.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Wang, W., Ma, H., Wang, Y., & Fu, M. (2015). Performance analysis based on least squares and extended Kalman filter for localization of static target in wireless sensor networks. Ad Hoc Networks,25, 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Yim, J., Jeong, S., Gwon, K., & Joo, J. (2010). Improvement of Kalman filters for WLAN based indoor tracking. Expert Systems with Applications,37, 426–433.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Al-Ammar, M. A., Alhadhrami, S., Al-Salman, A., Alarifi, A., Al-Khalifa, H. S., Alnafessah, A., et al. (2014). Comparative survey of indoor positioning technologies, techniques, and algorithms. In 2014 International conference on cyberworlds (CW) (pp. 245–252).

  4. Kul, G., Ozyer, T., & Tavli, B. (2014). IEEE 802.11 WLAN based real time indoor positioning: Literature survey and experimental investigations. Procedia Computer Science,34, 157–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Tesoriero, R., Tebar, R., Gallud, J. A., Lozano, M. D., & Penichet, V. M. R. (2010). Improving location awareness in indoor spaces using RFID technology. Expert Systems with Applications,37, 894–898.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Segers, L., Tiete, J., Braeken, A., & Touhafi, A. (2014). Ultrasonic multiple-access ranging system using spread spectrum and MEMS technology for indoor localization. Sensors-Basel,14, 3172–3187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Zwirello, L., Schipper, T., Jalilvand, M., & Zwick, T. (2015). Realization limits of impulse-based localization system for large-scale indoor applications. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement,64, 39–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Li, X., Wang, J., & Liu, C. Y. (2015). A Bluetooth/PDR integration algorithm for an indoor positioning system. Sensors-Basel,15, 24862–24885.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Zhuang, Y., Syed, Z., Li, Y., & El-Sheimy, N. (2016). Evaluation of two WiFi positioning systems based on autonomous crowdsourcing of handheld devices for indoor navigation. IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing,15, 1982–1995.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Liu, H. H., Lo, W. H., Tseng, C. C., & Shin, H. Y. (2014). A WiFi-based weighted screening method for indoor positioning systems. Wireless Personal Communications,79, 611–627.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kaemarungsi, K., Krishnamurthy, P. (2004). Properties of indoor received signal strength for WLAN location fingerprinting. In Proceedings of Mobiquitous (pp. 14–23).

  12. Oussalah, M., Alakhras, M., & Hussein, M. I. (2015). Multivariable fuzzy inference system for fingerprinting indoor localization. Fuzzy Sets and Systems,269, 65–89.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Yu, F., Jiang, M. H., Liang, J., Qin, X., Hu, M., Peng, T., et al. (2014). 5G WiFi signal-based indoor localization system using cluster k-nearest neighbor algorithm. International journal of distributed sensor networks,10, 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Khan, R., Khan, S. U., Khan, S., Khan, M. U. A., (2014). Localization performance evaluation of extended Kalman filter in wireless sensors network. In 5th International conference on ambient Systems, networks and technologies (ANT-2014), the 4th international conference on sustainable energy information technology (SEIT-2014) (vol. 32, pp. 117–124).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Wang, J., Prasad, R. V., An, X., & Niemegeers, I. G. M. M. (2012). A study on wireless sensor network based indoor positioning systems for context-aware applications. Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing,12, 53–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Wicks, A. L., & Kemerling, J. C. (2004). The 802 Standard Related to Wireless Technology. Experimental Techniques,28(4), 37–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Lohan, E. S., Talvitie, J., Silva, P. F. E., Nurminen, H., Ali-Loytty, S., Piche, R. (2015). Received signal strength models for WLAN and BLE-based indoor positioning in multi-floor buildings. In 2015 International conference on location and GNSS (ICL-GNSS).

  18. Talvitie, J., Renfors, M., Lohan, E. S. (2015). A comparison of received signal strength statistics between 2.4 GHz and 5 GHz bands for WLAN-based indoor positioning. In 2015 IEEE globecom workshops (GC Wkshps).

  19. Talvitie, J., Renfors, M., & Lohan, E. S. (2015). Distance-based interpolation and extrapolation methods for RSS-based localization with indoor wireless signals. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology,64, 1340–1353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Lui, G., Gallagher, T., Li, B., Dempster, A. G., Rizos, C. (2011). Differences in RSSI readings made by different Wi-Fi chipsets: A limitation of WLAN localization. In 2011 International conference on localization and GNSS (ICL-GNSS) (pp. 53–57).

  21. İlçi, V., Gülal, E., & Alkan, R. M. (2018). An investigation of different Wi-Fi signal behaviours and their effects on indoor positioning accuracy. Survey Review,2018, 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Karlsson, F., Karlsson, M., Bernhardsson, B., Tufvesson, F., Persson, M. (2015). Sensor fused indoor positioning using dual band WiFi signal measurements. In 2015 European control conference (ECC) (pp. 1669–1672). Linz: IEEE.

  23. Zhuang, Y., Syed, Z., Georgy, J., & El-Sheimy, N. (2015). Autonomous smartphone-based WiFi positioning system by using access points localization and crowdsourcing. Pervasive and Mobile Computing,18, 118–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Correa, A., Munoz Diaz, E., Bousdar Ahmed, D., Morell, A., & Lopez Vicario, J. (2016). Advanced pedestrian positioning system to smartphones and smartwatches. Sensors (Basel),16(11), 1903.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Chen, L. H., Wu, E. H. K., Jin, M. H., & Chen, G. H. (2014). Intelligent fusion of Wi-Fi and inertial sensor-based positioning systems for indoor pedestrian navigation. IEEE Sensors Journal,14, 4034–4042.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Lee, S., Kim, B., Kim, H., Ha, R., & Cha, H. (2011). Inertial sensor-based indoor pedestrian localization with minimum 802.15.4a configuration. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics,7, 455–466.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Harle, R. (2013). A survey of indoor inertial positioning systems for pedestrians. IEEE Communications Surveys and Tutorials,15, 1281–1293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Liu, J., Chen, R., Pei, L., Guinness, R., & Kuusniemi, H. (2012). A hybrid smartphone indoor positioning solution for mobile LBS. Sensors-Basel,12, 17208–17233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Li, Y., Zhuang, Y., Lan, H., Zhang, P., Niu, X., & El-Sheimy, N. (2015). WiFi-aided magnetic matching for indoor navigation with consumer portable devices. Micromachines-Basel,6, 747–764.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Chen, Z., Zou, H., Jiang, H., Zhu, Q., Soh, Y. C., & Xie, L. (2015). Fusion of WiFi, smartphone sensors and landmarks using the Kalman filter for indoor localization. Sensors-Basel,15, 715–732.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Deng, Z. A., Hu, Y., Yu, J., & Na, Z. (2015). Extended Kalman filter for real time indoor localization by fusing WiFi and smartphone inertial sensors. Micromachines-Basel,6, 523–543.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Lan, H., Yu, C., Zhuang, Y., Li, Y., & El-Sheimy, N. (2015). A novel Kalman filter with state constraint approach for the integration of multiple pedestrian navigation systems. Micromachines-Basel,6, 926–952.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Zhuang, Y., & El-Sheimy, N. (2016). Tightly-coupled integration of WiFi and MEMS sensors on handheld devices for indoor pedestrian navigation. IEEE Sensors Journal,16, 224–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Parasuraman, R., Fabry, T., Molinari, L., Kershaw, K., Castro, M. D., Masi, A., et al. (2014). A multi-sensor RSS spatial sensing-based robust stochastic optimization algorithm for enhanced wireless tethering. Sensors-Basel,14, 23970–24003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Seidel, S. Y., & Rappaport, T. S. (1992). 914 MHz path loss prediction models for indoor wireless communications in multifloored buildings. IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation,40, 207–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Rappaport, T. S. (2002). Wireless communications principles and practice (2nd ed., p. XXIII, 707 S). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  37. Sarkar, T. K., Ji, Z., Kim, K., Medouri, A., & Salazar-Palma, M. (2003). A survey of various propagation models for mobile communication. IEEE Antennas and propagation Magazine,45, 51–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Naik, U., & Bapat, V. N. (2014). Adaptive empirical path loss prediction models for indoor WLAN. Wireless Personal Communications,79, 1003–1016.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. ITU-R. (2015). Propagation data and prediction methods for the planning of indoor radiocommunication systems and radio local area networks in the frequency range 300 MHz to 100 GHz (pp. 1–22). Geneva: International Telecommunication Union.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Tarrio, P., Bernardos, A. M., & Casar, J. R. (2012). An energy-efficient strategy for accurate distance estimation in wireless sensor networks. Sensors-Basel,12, 15438–15466.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Seybold, J. S. (2005). Introduction to RF propagation (p. 330 S). Hoboken: Wiley.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  42. Li, X., Hua, B., Shang, Y., Cu, Y., Yue, L. (2007). Bilateration: An attack-resistant localization algorithm of wireless sensor network. In Embedded and ubiquitous computing, proceedings (vol. 4808, pp. 321–332).

  43. Cota-Ruiz, J., Rosiles, J. G., Sifuentes, E., & Rivas-Perea, P. (2012). A low-complexity geometric Bilateration method for localization in wireless sensor networks and its comparison with least-squares methods. Sensors-Basel,12, 839–862.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Caceres, M. A., Sottile, F., Spirito, M. A. (2009). Adaptive location tracking by Kalman filter in wireless sensor networks. In 2009 IEEE international conference on wireless and mobile computing, networking and communications (pp. 123–128).

  45. Khan, R., Sottile, F., & Spirito, M. A. (2013). Hybrid positioning through extended Kalman filter with inertial data fusion. International Journal of Information and Electronics Engineering,3, 127–131.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Welch, G., & Bishop, G. (2006). An introduction to the kalman filter. Chapel Hill, NC: Department of computer science, University of North Carolina. (unpublished manuscript).

    Google Scholar 

  47. Tarrio, P., Bernardos, A. M., Besada, J. A., Caser, J. R. (2008). A new positioning technique for RSS-based localization based on a weighted least squares estimator. In 2008 IEEE international symposium on wireless communication systems (ISWCS 2008) (pp. 358–362).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Vocational School of Technical Sciences, Hitit University, Çorum, Turkey

    Veli İlçi

  2. Department of Geomatics Engineering, Yıldız Technical University, İstanbul, Turkey

    Engin Gülal

  3. Department of Geomatics Engineering, İstanbul Technical University, İstanbul, Turkey

    Reha Metin Alkan

Authors
  1. Veli İlçi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Engin Gülal
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Reha Metin Alkan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Veli İlçi.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

İlçi, V., Gülal, E. & Alkan, R.M. Performance Comparison of 2.4 and 5 GHz WiFi Signals and Proposing a New Method for Mobile Indoor Positioning. Wireless Pers Commun 110, 1493–1511 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-019-06797-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-019-06797-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation