Skip to main content
Log in

Adopting Dilution of Precision for Indoor Localization

  • Published:
Wireless Personal Communications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Due to the rising number of aged people in the last decades, many apprehensions about their quality of life and their personal security in their own homes came to surface especially when these persons prefer to live alone. Compared to other age groups, old persons are more susceptive to domestic incidents, such as sudden illnesses and falls. Therefore, using new technologies in elderly homecare became one of the most urgent issues to study. These technologies are classified into three categories: real time vital sign monitoring, activity recognition and indoor localization. In this paper we present our work in indoor positioning which is the combination of three existing technologies in a more effective, precise and accurate way: Bluetooth Low Energy, Acoustic and Light Fidelity (LiFi). Our main contribution is the proposition of new “dilution of precision” (DOP) indicators as precision weights of the results given by each technology. Depending on these new DOP-like indicators, we were able to judge how much precise and accurate the returned results are. The experiments we conducted proved that precision is much better when using these new precision metrics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21
Fig. 22
Fig. 23
Fig. 24

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Thaljaoui, A., Brulin, D., Val, T., & Nasri, N. (2014). Localisation d’une source sonore par un réseau de microphones. Journées Nationales des Communications Terrestres-JNCT (No. ISBN 978-3, pp. pp-95).

  2. Thaljaoui, A., Val, T., Nasri, N., & Brulin, D. (2015). BLE localization using RSSI measurements and iRingLA. In 2015 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Technology (ICIT) (pp. 2178–2183). IEEE.

  3. Khan, M. W., Salman, N., & Kemp, A. H. (2014). Enhanced hybrid positioning in wireless networks I: AoA-ToA. In 2014 International conference on telecommunications and multimedia (TEMU) (pp. 86–91). IEEE.

  4. Jiang J. R., Lin C. M., Lin F. Y., & Huang S. T. (2012) ALRD: AoA localization with RSSI differences of directional antennas for wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of the international conference on information society (i-society), London, UK. 25–28 June (pp. 304–309).

  5. Wang, Y., Wiemeler, M., Zheng, F., Xiong, W., & Kaiser, T. (2013). Two-step hybrid self-localization using unsynchronized low-complexity anchors. In 2013 international conference on localization and GNSS (ICL-GNSS) (pp. 1–5). IEEE.

  6. Khan, M. W., Salman, N., & Kemp, A. H. (2014). Cooperative positioning using angle of arrival and time of arrival. In 2014 sensor signal processing for defence (SSPD) (pp. 1–5). IEEE.

  7. Zhang, D., Xia, F., Yang, Z., Yao, L., & Zhao, W. (2010). Localization technologies for indoor human tracking. In 2010 5th international conference on future information technology (pp. 1–6). IEEE.

  8. Digital Mobile Radio towords Future Generation Systems, Final Report, Brussels (1996).

  9. Gustafsson, F., & Gunnarsson, F. (2003). Positioning using time-difference of arrival measurements. In 2003 IEEE international conference on acoustics, speech, and signal processing, 2003. Proceedings.(ICASSP’03) (Vol. 6, pp. VI–553). IEEE.

  10. Aziz, N. A. A., Aziz, K. A., & Ismail, W. Z. W. (2009). Coverage strategies for wireless sensor networks. World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, 50, 145–150.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Simsim, M. T., Khan, N. M., Ramer, R., & Rapajic, P. B. (2006). Time of arrival statistics in cellular environments. In 2006 IEEE 63rd vehicular technology conference (Vol. 6, pp. 2666–2670). IEEE.

  12. Montaser, A., Azram, R., & Moselhi, O. (2013). Experimental study for efficient use of Rfid in construction. In ISARC. Proceedings of the international symposium on automation and robotics in construction (Vol. 30, p. 1). Vilnius Gediminas Technical University, Department of Construction Economics & Property.

  13. Parameswaran, A. T., Husain, M. I., & Upadhyaya, S. (2009). Is RSSI a reliable parameter in sensor localization algorithms: an experimental study. In Field failure data analysis workshop (F2DA09) (Vol. 5). IEEE.

  14. Luo, J. (2014). Range error correction in RSSI-based wireless sensor node localization. In 2014 IEEE International Conference on Mechatronics and Automation (pp. 379-383). IEEE.

  15. Poole, I. (2017). Free space path loss: details, formula, calculator. radio-electronics.com. Adrio Communications Ltd. Retrieved July 17, 2017.

  16. Paul, A., & Sato, T. (2017). Localization in wireless sensor networks: a survey on algorithms, measurement techniques, applications and challenges. Journal of Sensor and Actuator Networks, 6(4), 24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Langendoen, K., & Reijers, N. (2003). Distributed localization in wireless sensor networks: A quantitative comparison. Computer Networks, 43(4), 499–518.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Do, T. H., & Yoo, M. (2016). An in-depth survey of visible light communication based positioning systems. Sensors, 16(5), 678.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Wang, C., Wang, L., Chi, X., Liu, S., Shi, W., & Deng, J. (2015). The research of indoor positioning based on visible light communication. China Communications, 12(8), 85–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Hassan, N. U., Naeem, A., Pasha, M. A., Jadoon, T., & Yuen, C. (2015). Indoor positioning using visible LED lights: A survey. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), 48(2), 20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. https://www.abiresearch.com/market-research/product/1021327-wireless-connectivity-ics/. Accessed 2019

  22. https://developer.apple.com/ibeacon/Getting-Started-with-iBeacon.pdf. Accessed 2019

  23. Thaljaoui, A., Val, T., Nasri, N., & Brulin, D. (2015). BLE localization using RSSI measurements and iRingLA. In 2015 IEEE international conference on industrial technology (ICIT) (pp. 2178–2183). IEEE.

  24. Dalce, R. (2013). Méthodes de localisation par le signal de communication dans les réseaux de capteurs sans fil en intérieur. Doctoral dissertation, Toulouse, INSA.

  25. Dalce, R., Van den Bossche, A., & Val, T. (2014). An experimental performance study of an original ranging protocol based on an IEEE 802.15. 4a UWB testbed. In 2014 IEEE international conference on ultra-wideband (ICUWB) (pp. 7–12). IEEE.

  26. Dalce, R., Van den Bossche, A., & Val, T. (2013). Indoor self-localization in a WSN, based on Time Of Flight: Propositions and demonstrator. In international conference on indoor positioning and indoor navigation (pp. 1–6). IEEE.

  27. Mainetti, L., Patrono, L., & Sergi, I. (2014). A survey on indoor positioning systems. In 2014 22nd international conference on software, telecommunications and computer networks (SoftCOM) (pp. 111–120). IEEE.

  28. Bahl, P., & Padmanabhan, V. N. (2000). RADAR: An in-building RF-based user location and tracking system. In IEEE infocom (Vol. 2, No. 2000, pp. 775–784). Institute of Electrical Engineers Inc (IEEE).

  29. Otsason V., Varshavsky A., LaMarca A., de Lara E. (2005) Accurate GSM Indoor Localization. In M. Beigl, S. Intille, J. Rekimoto, & H. Tokuda H. (Eds.), UbiComp 2005: Ubiquitous computing. UbiComp 2005. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Vol. 3660). Berlin: Springer.

  30. Thompson, R. (1985). A note on restricted maximum likelihood estimation with an alternative outlier model. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Methodological), 47(1), 53–55.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Liu, X., & Maekawa T. (2013). Spring Model based collaborative indoor position estimation with neighbor mobile terminals. IPSJ SIG Technical report.

  32. Fernandez, T. M., Rodas, J., Escudero, C. J., & Iglesia, D. I. (2007) Bluetooth sensor network positioning system with dynamic calibration. In IEEE ISWCS07, A Coruna, Spain.

  33. Aarabi, P., & Zaky, S. (2000). Iterative spatial probability based sound localization. In Proceedings of the 4th world multiconference on circuits, systems, computers, and communications (Vol. 142).

  34. Aarabi, P., & Zaky, S. (2001). Robust sound localization using multi-source audiovisual information fusion. Information Fusion, 2(3), 209–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Zhang, W., & Kavehrad, M. (2013). Comparison of VLC-based indoor positioning techniques. In Broadband access communication technologies VII (Vol. 8645, p. 86450M). International Society for Optics and Photonics.

  36. Anbarasi, M. S., Ghaayathri, S., Kamaleswari, R., & Abirami, I. (2011). Outlier detection for multidimensional medical data. International Journal of Computer Science and Information Technologies, 2(1), 512–516.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the Deanship of Scientific Research at Majmaah University for supporting this work under Project Number R-1441-2.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Salim El Khediri.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Thaljaoui, A., El Khediri, S. Adopting Dilution of Precision for Indoor Localization. Wireless Pers Commun 128, 2307–2340 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-019-06896-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-019-06896-9

Keywords

Navigation