Skip to main content
Log in

Joint Phase and Amplitude Modelling Using a Finite-State Markov Chain for η–µ Fading Channels

  • Published:
Wireless Personal Communications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The η–µ fading distribution is used for better representation of small scale variations of the faded signal in Non Line-Of-Sight conditions. In this paper, first-order Finite-State Markov Chain (FSMC) model of η–µ fading channel is proposed for two cases. i.e., considering received signal amplitude only and by jointly varying amplitude and phase. FSMC model captures the essence of slowly fading channels and acts as an important tool to study the performance of wireless communication systems. The Performance parameters of η–µ fading channels like level crossing rate, steady-state probability, state-time duration and state transition probability are studied. Numerical results depicting the performance of FSMC for η–µ fading channels show that η–µ distribution (Format 2) is a severely affected fading channel as compared to η–µ distribution (Format 1) as the former generally occurs in urban areas whereas the latter occurs in suburban and rural areas.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Braun, R., & Dersch, U. (1991). A physical mobile radio channel model. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology,40(2), 472–482.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Suzuki, H. (1977). A statistical model for urban radio propagation. IEEE Transactions on Communications,25(7), 673–679.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Yacoub, M. D. (2000). The η–µ distribution: A general fading distribution. In IEEE fall vehicular technology conference, Boston, USA (pp. 872–877).

  4. Yacoub, M. D. (2007). The k-µ distribution and the η − µ distribution. IEEE Antennas and Propagation Magazine,49(1), 68–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Filho, J. C. S., & Yacoub, M. D. (2005). Highly accurate η − µ approximation to the sum of M independent non-identical Hoyt variates. IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters,4(1), 436–438.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Da Costa, D. B., & Yacoub, M. D. (2007). The η–µ joint phase-envelope distribution. In Wireless communications and networking conference, Kowloon (pp. 1906–1908).

  7. Ermolova, N. Y. (2009). Useful integrals for performance evaluation of communication systems in generalized k-mu and eta-mu fading channels. IET Communications,3(2), 303–308.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Zhang, J., Matthaiou, M., Tan, Z., & Wang, H. (2012). Performance Analysis of digital communication systems over composite eta-mu/Gamma fading channels. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology,61(7), 3114–3124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Sadeghi, P., Kennedy, R. A., Rapajic, P. B., & Shams, R. (2008). Finite-State Markov modelling of fading channels. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine,25(5), 57–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Guan, Y. L., & Turner, L. F. (1999). Generalised FSMC model for radio channels with correlated fading. IEE Proceedings on Communications,146(2), 133–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Riediger, M., & Shwedyk, E., (2003). Communication receivers based on Markov models of the fading channel. In IEEE Canadian conference on electrical and computer engineering, Winnipeg, MB, Canada (pp. 275–279).

  12. Wang, H. S., & Moayeri, N. (1995). Finite-state Markov channel—A useful model for radio communication channels. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology,44(1), 163–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Park, J. M., & Hwang, G. U. (2009). Mathematical modelling of Rayleigh fading channels based on finite state Markov Chain. IEEE Communications Letters,13(10), 763–766.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Nithya, V., & Bhaskar, V. (2011). Finite-state Markov channel modelling under jointly varying amplitude and phase in time-varying flat fading channels. IET Communications,5(9), 1237–1245.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Bhaskar, V., & Peram, N. (2013). Performance modelling of finite state Markov chains for Nakagami-q and α-µ distributions over adaptive modulation and coding schemes. International Journal of Electronics and Communications,67(1), 64–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Bhaskar, V. (2007). Finite-state Markov model for Lognormal, Chi square(central), Chi square(non-central) and K distribution. International Journal of Wireless Information Networks,14(4), 237–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Bhaskar, V., & Adjallah, K. H. (2005). Finite-State Markov Model for Chi square(central) SNR distribution in A-CDMA systems. In International conference on communications, internet and information technology, Cambridge, MA.

  18. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Incomplete_gamma_function.

  19. Jakes, W. C. (1974). Microwave mobile communications (1st ed.). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  20. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bessel_function#Modified_Bessel_functions_:_I.CE.B1.2C_K.CE.B1.

  21. Gradshteyn, I. S., & Ryzhik, I. M. (1994). Table of integrals, series and products (5th ed.). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vidhyacharan Bhaskar.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix

Appendix

1.1 Algorithm to Find Level Crossing Rate (LCR), Steady State Probability (SSP), State Transition Probability (STP), and State Time Duration (STD)

Input: fm, µ and η

Output: LCR, SSP, STP, STD

1.2 η–µ Fading Distribution Format 1

Case 1: First order FSMC modeling of η–µ fading distribution (Format 1) considering the received signal amplitude only

  • 01: Divide the signal amplitude values into K states

  • 02: Set upper limit value for each state \(v_{k}\)

  • 03: Total number of states S = K

  • 04: k = State index

  • 05: for k = 1: S do

  • 06: Calculate LCR, Nk using Eq. (9)

  • 07: Calculate SSP, πk using Eq. (4)

  • 08: Calculate STP, \(t_{k,k - 1}\) for transition from present state to previous state using Eq. (12)

  • 09: Calculate STP, \(t_{k,k}\) for looping back to same state using Eq. (12)

  • 10: Calculate STP, \(t_{k,k + 1}\) for transition from present state to next state using Eq. (12)

  • 11: Calculate STD, \(\overline{\tau }_{k}\) using Eq. (14)

  • 12: end

  • 13: Plot LCR, SSP, STP and STD

Case 2: First order FSMC modeling of η–µ fading distribution (Format 1) by jointly varying both received signal amplitude and phase

  • 13: Divide the phase values into K1 states

  • 14: Set upper limit for each phase state \(v_{k1}\)

  • 15: Total number of states S = K. K1

  • 16: Repeat (04) to (13) using Eqs. (9), (5), (13) and (15)

1.3 η–µ Fading Distribution Format 2

Case 1: First order FSMC modeling of η–µ fading distribution (Format 2) considering the received signal amplitude only

  • 17: Repeat (01) to (13) using Eqs. (21), (18), (22) and (24)

Case 2: First order FSMC modeling of η–µ fading distribution (Format 2) by jointly varying both received signal amplitude and phase

  • 18: Repeat (13) to (16) using Eqs. (21), (19), (23) and (25)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nithya, V., Priyanka, C. & Bhaskar, V. Joint Phase and Amplitude Modelling Using a Finite-State Markov Chain for η–µ Fading Channels. Wireless Pers Commun 112, 923–940 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-020-07083-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-020-07083-x

Keywords

Navigation