Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Dynamic Model Node Scheduling Algorithm Along with OBSP Technique to Schedule the Node in the Sensitive Cluster Region in the WSN

  • Published:
Wireless Personal Communications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In large-scale applications in science and business space require the exchange of enormous information over high performance systems for remote tasks. In wireless sensor networks, the sensor planning is a appropriate set up for controlling the node energy utilization and expanding network coverage lifetime. The task is to decide a proper planning component for the nodes with the end goal to keep up adequate check of dynamic nodes for maximum network coverage. In this paper we demonstrate the node scheduling algorithm and discuss about the transmission scheduling technique. The node can be described in various level of simulation with described active nodes. The life time of the active node will describes in the simulation diagram. The scheduling technique of the node can be clearly defined in the proposed algorithm to communicate the information of the node within the clusters. Moreover the proposed dynamic model node scheduling algorithm to schedule the node within in the cluster region. And we propose the few techniques of OBSP to know the status of the node and its various levels. In our work we clearly demonstrate the three states of the node. The cluster connection will be done with the help of the gateway node.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lu, Y., Zhang, T., He, E., & Comşa, I. S. (2018). Self-learning-based data aggregation scheduling policy in wireless sensor networks. Journal of Sensors, 2018, 12.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Murugaanandam, S., & Ganapathy, V. (2019). Reliability-based cluster head selection methodology using fuzzy logic for performance improvement in WSNs. IEEE Access, 7, 87357.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Yen, L. H., Law, Y. W., & Palaniswami, M. (2012). Risk-aware distributed beacon scheduling for tree-based ZigBee wireless networks. IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing, 11(4), 692–703.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Marsan, M. A., Chiasserini, C. F., Nucci, A., Carello, G., & De Giovanni, L. (2002). Optimizing the topology of bluetooth wireless personal area networks. In Proceedings of the INFOCOM 2002, twenty-first annual joint conference of the IEEE computer and communications societies (vol. 2, pp 572–579). IEEE.

  5. Chen, Y. S., & Lin, T. H. (2007). A time-slot leasing-based QoSrouting protocol over Bluetooth WPANs. International Journal of Ad Hoc and Ubiquitous Computing, 2(1), 92–108.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Giri, D., & Roy, U. K. (2009). Address borrowing in wireless personal area network. In IEEE international advance computing conference, (IACC 2009), (pp 181–186). Patiala.

  7. Zheng, J., & Lee, M. J. (2006). A comprehensive performance study of IEEE802.15.4, sensor network operations (pp. 218–237). Hoboken: IEEE Press.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Lee, J.-S. (2006). Performance evaluation of IEEE 802.15. 4 for low-ratewireless personal area networks. IEEE Transactions on Consumer Electronics, 52(3), 742–749.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Al-Harbawi, M., Rasid, M. F., & Noordin, N. K. (2009). Improved treerouting (ImpTR) protocol for ZigBee network. International Journal of Computer Science and Network Security, 9(10), 146–152.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Cuomo, F., Luna, S. D., Monaco, U., & Melodia, T. (2007). Routing in ZigBee: Benefits from exploiting the IEEE 802.15.4 association tree. IEEE international conference on communications 2007 (ICC'07).

  11. Chéour, R., Jmal, M. W., Kanoun, O., & Abid, M. (2017). Evaluation of simulator tools and power-aware scheduling model for wireless sensor networks. IET Computers & Digital Techniques, 11(5), 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Sanchez, C. A., Mokrenko, O., Zaccarian, L., & Lesecq, S. (2018). A hybrid control law for energy-oriented tasks scheduling in wireless sensor networks. IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, 26(6), 95.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Jothikumar, C., & Venkataraman, R. (2019). EODC: An energy optimized dynamic clustering protocol for wireless sensor network using PSO approach. International Journal of Computers Communications & Control, 14(2), 183–192.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kelner, J. M., & Ziółkowski, C. (2019). Comments on “A Three-Dimensional Geometrical Scattering Model for Cellular Communication Environment”. Wireless Personal Communications, 108, 1481–1491. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-019-06480-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Lipiński, Z. (2018). Routing algorithm for maximizing lifetime of wireless sensor network for broadcast transmission. Wireless Personal Communications, 101, 251–268. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-018-5686-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. More, A., & Wagh, S. (2015). Energy efficient coverage using optimized node scheduling in wireless sensor networks. In 2015 1st international conference on next generation computing technologies (NGCT).

  17. Xin-lian, Z., & Bo, G. (2008). Intra-cluster nodes scheduling algorithm satisfying expected coverage degree of application in distributed clustering WSNs. In: 2008 international conference on computer science and software engineering.

  18. Zhang, H. (1995). Service disciplines for guaranteed performance service inpacket-switching networks. Proceedings of the IEEE, 83(10), 1374–1396.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Heinzelman, W. B., Chandrakasan, A. P., & Balakrishnan, H. (2002). An application-specific protocol architecture for wireless microsensor networks. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 1(4), 660–770.

    Google Scholar 

  20. More, A., & Raisinghani, V. (2014). Random backoff sleep protocol for energy efficient coverage in wireless sensor networks. Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies, 28(2), 323–331.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Huang, Y. K., Pang, A. C., Hsiu, P. C., Zhuang, W., & Liu, P. (2012). Distributed throughput optimization for ZigBee cluster tree networks. IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems, 23(3), 513–520.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Saleh, A. B., Sibley, M. J., Mather, P. (2014). Energy efficient cluster scheduling and interference mitigation for IEEE 802.15.4 network. In 2014 international computer science and engineering conference (ICSEC).

  23. Sakthy, S. S., & Bose, S. (2019). Optimising residual energy transmission head with SNR value in multiple clusters. Wireless Personal Communications, 108(1), 107–120.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Jayarajan, P., Kanagachidambaresan, G. R., Sundararajan, T. V. P., et al. (2018). An energy-aware buffer management (EABM) routing protocol for WSN. The Journal of Supercomputing. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11227-018-2582-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Information Technology, Sri Sairam Engineering College, Chennai, India

    S. Susila Sakthy

  2. Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Anna University, Chennai, India

    S. Bose

Authors
  1. S. Susila Sakthy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. S. Bose
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. Susila Sakthy.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Susila Sakthy, S., Bose, S. Dynamic Model Node Scheduling Algorithm Along with OBSP Technique to Schedule the Node in the Sensitive Cluster Region in the WSN. Wireless Pers Commun 114, 265–279 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-020-07362-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-020-07362-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation