Skip to main content
Log in

Contribution to Optimization and Evaluation of IPv6 Signals Based Constrained Devices Networks

  • Published:
Wireless Personal Communications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Small Objects Networks is a wireless network that we used to define any type of network. These networks use the IPv6 protocol for communication. Indeed, it allows, via standardized and unified electronic identification systems, to identify directly, unambiguously physical objects and thus ability to retrieve, store, transfer, and process related data. In such a network, the IPv6 Neighbor Discovery protocol is used by an object to communicate with its neighbors in order to establish the relationship between the IPv6 (Internet Protocol Version 6) address and that MAC. Since the NDP (Neighbor Discovery Protocol) messages are relatively long and large, several operating parameters, such as power consumption, are affected accordingly which reduces the lifetime of the connected objects and adversely affects the proper functioning of the network. The goal of our paper is to reduce the use of these messages in 6lowpan networks to minimize energy consumption and maximize network lifetime… The results of our simulation show a big reduction of the signals used in the network compared to the standard NDP-RFC4861. Our algorithm also shows better performance in terms of energy consumption.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Zeinab, K. A. M., & Elmustafa, S. A. A. (2017). Internet of things applications, challenges and related future technologies. World Scientific News, 2(67), 126–148.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Kumar, R., Singh, G., & Gaba, G. S. (2016). An effective approach for minimizing energy consumption in WSN. Indian Journal of Science and Technology, 9(21), 1–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Abbas, Z., & Yoon, W. (2015). A survey on energy conserving mechanisms for the internet of things: Wireless networking aspects. Sensors, 15(10), 24818–24847.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Ozcelik, I. M., Korpeoglu, I., & Agrawala, A. (2017). Energy efficient IP-connectivity with IEEE 802.11 for home M2M networks. The Computer Journal, 60(6), 883–897.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Abedin, S. F. et al. (2015). A system model for energy efficient green-IoT network. In 2015 international conference on information networking (ICOIN. IEEE.

  6. Lingaraj, M., & Prakash, A. (2019). Power Aware Routing Protocol (PARP) to reduce energy consumption in wireless sensor networks. International Journal of Recent Technology and Engineering (IJRTE) ISSN: 2277-3878, 7 (5).

  7. Saranya, S., & Ravi, G. (2015). A review on power saving techniques in MANET. International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, 5(5), 1–4.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Jerew, O., & Al Bassam, N. (2019). Delay tolerance and energy saving in wireless sensor networks with a mobile base station. Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing,. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/3929876.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. El Alami, H., & Najid, A. (2018). MS-routing-G i: routing technique to minimise energy consumption and packet loss in WSNs with mobile sink. IET Networks, 7(6), 422–428.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Yan, M., et al. (2019). Modeling the total energy consumption of mobile network services and applications. Energies, 12(1), 184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kumar, K., & Goel, S., (2017). A literature review to optimize the energy consumption in wireless sensor network. International Journal of Computer Science and Mobile Computing, 6(7), 106–113.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Srinidhi, N. N., Dilip Kumar, S. M., & Venugopal, K. R. (2019). Network optimizations in the Internet of Things: A review. Engineering Science and Technology, an International Journal, 22(1), 1–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Loreti, P., & Bracciale, L. (2019). Optimized neighbor discovery for opportunistic networks of energy constrained IoT devices. IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing, 19(6), 1387–1400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Ksimi El, A., & Leghris, C. (2018). Minimising the impact of IPv6 neighbour discovery messages on energy consumption in small objects networks. IET Networks, 7(4), 226–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Gomez, C., et al. (2017). Energy-Efficient features of internet of things protocols. draft-ietf-lwigenergy-efficient-06 (trabajo en curso).

  16. Simpson, W. A., et al. (2007). Neighbor discovery for IP version 6 (IPv6). Internet Engineering Task Force, RFC2461 (1998).

  17. Shelby, Z., et al. (2012). Neighbor discovery optimization for IPv6 over low-power wireless personal area networks (6LoWPANs). RFC 6775.

  18. Österlind, F. (2006). A sensor network simulator for the Contiki OS. SICS Research Report.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ali El Ksimi.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

El Ksimi, A., Leghris, C. Contribution to Optimization and Evaluation of IPv6 Signals Based Constrained Devices Networks. Wireless Pers Commun 117, 2311–2325 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-020-07974-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-020-07974-z

Keywords

Navigation