Skip to main content

Advertisement

Springer Nature Link
Log in

An Optimized Routing Algorithm for Enhancing Scalability of Wireless Sensor Network

  • Published:
Wireless Personal Communications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Wireless sensor network has fascinated numerous researchers over the last few decades because of its sensing technology. Evolving trend in the development of WSNs is—“One deployment, multiple applications”. Multiple sensor nodes are deployed over a large geographical area in WSN and the communication takes place through a wireless media. It is supposed that sensor nodes can interact with the Base Station through one-hop routing. But existing routing protocol becomes inept when the network size rises because of large distance between sink and sensor nodes. A routing protocol is considered reliable if it work efficiently when the size of network grows or there is increase in workload. That’s why achieving scalability became one of the prominent research goal in wireless sensor network. An optimized routing algorithm has been proposed in this paper for enhancing scalability of WSN. For collecting and aggregating data efficiently from cluster heads, a mobile agent has been deployed. Sink collects data from its nearby cluster heads and rest of the data is gathered by the mobile agent by moving along a trajectory. Hot-Spot problem is also resolved by mobile agent. Mobile agent diminishes energy expenditure incurred by the CHs away from base station. It adds 54.43%, 24.38%, 20.88% reclamation in stability period in comparison to ISMAP, GA-MIP and EHLDC, it further adds 63.40%, 42.85%, 31.50% recuperation in throughput in comparison to ISMAP, GA-MIP and EHLDC and 66.97%, 45.89%, 26.50% reclamation in network lifetime in comparison to ISMAP, GA-MIP and EHLDC.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hailing, C. L. J., Yong, M., Tianpu, L., Wei, L., & Ze, Z. (2005). Overview of wireless sensor networks. Journal of Computer Research and Development, 1, 021.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Matin, M. A., & Islam, M. M. (2012). Overview of wireless sensor network. In Wireless sensor networks-technology and protocols (pp. 1–3).

  3. Buratti, C., Conti, A., Dardari, D., & Verdone, R. (2009). An overview on wireless sensor networks technology and evolution. Sensors, 9(9), 6869–6896.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bhattacharyya, D., Kim, T. H., & Pal, S. (2010). A comparative study of wireless sensor networks and their routing protocols. Sensors, 10(12), 10506–10523.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Shanthi, S., Nayak, P., & Dandu, S. (2019). Minimization of energy consumption in wireless sensor networks by using a special mobile agent. In Soft computing and signal processing (pp. 359–368). Singapore: Springer.

  6. Carlos-Mancilla, M., López-Mellado, E., & Siller, M. (2016). Wireless sensor networks formation: Approaches and techniques. Journal of Sensors, 2016, 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Alazzawi, L., & Elkateeb, A. (2008). Performance evaluation of the WSN routing protocols scalability. Journal of Computer Systems, Networks, and Communications, 2008, 481046. https://doi.org/10.1155/2008/481046.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Noufal, K. P. (2015). Wireless sensor networks–scalability and performance issues: A review. IJCST, 6(1), 139–140.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Mamun, Q. (2012). A qualitative comparison of different logical topologies for wireless sensor networks. Sensors, 12(11), 14887–14913.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Dhage, M. S. V., Thakre, A. N., & Mohod, S. W. (2014). A review on scalability issue in wireless sensor networks. International Journal of Innovative Research in Advanced Engineering (IJIRAE), 1, 463–466.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Abdullah, T., Zin, H., Wu, M., & Kim, C. (2015). Intra-cluster routing with back-up path in sensor networks. https://doi.org/10.5121/csit.2015.50212.

  12. Cheng, L., Das, S. K., Di Francesco, M., Chen, C., & Ma, J. (2011). Scalable and energy-efficient broadcasting in multi-hop cluster-based wireless sensor networks. In 2011 IEEE international conference on communications (ICC) (pp. 1–5). IEEE.

  13. Lourthu Hepziba, M. M., Balamurugan, K., & Vijayaraj, M. (2013). Maximization of lifetime and reducing power consumption in wireless sensor network using protocol. International Journal of Soft Computing and Engineering, 2(6), 90–95.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Jan, B., Farman, H., Javed, H., Montrucchio, B., Khan, M., & Ali, S. (2017). Energy efficient hierarchical clustering approaches in wireless sensor networks: A survey. Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing, 2017, 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Wu, C., Wu, W., Wan, C., Bekkering, E., & Xiong, N. (2017). Design and analysis of a data fusion scheme in mobile wireless sensor networks based on multi-protocol mobile agents. Sensors, 17(11), 2523.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Gavalas, D., Venetis, I. E., Konstantopoulos, C., & Pantziou, G. (2017). Mobile agent itinerary planning for WSN data fusion: Considering multiple sinks and heterogeneous networks. International Journal of Communication Systems, 30(8), e3184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Deep, K., and Niranjan, S. (2019). Mobile agent embedding in cluster based wireless sensor network environment. International Journal of Innovative Technology and Exploring Engineering (IJITEE), 8(7S2). ISSN: 2278-3075.

  18. Ha, I., Djuraev, M., & Ahn, B. (2017). An optimal data gathering method for mobile sinks in wsns. Wireless Personal Communications, 97(1), 1401–1417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Qi, H., & Wang, F. (2001). Optimal itinerary analysis for mobile agents in ad hoc wireless sensor networks. Proceedings of the IEEE, 18(5), 147–153.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Wu, Q., Rao, N. S., Barhen, J., Iyengar, S. S., Vaishnavi, V. K., Qi, H., et al. (2004). On computing mobile agent routes for data fusion in distributed sensor networks. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 6, 740–753.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Chen, M., Cai, W., Gonzalez, S., & Leung, V. C. (2010). Balanced itinerary planning for multiple mobile agents in wireless sensor networks. In International conference on ad hoc networks (pp. 416–418). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.

  22. Xu, Y., & Qi, H. (2006). Dynamic mobile agent migration in wireless sensor networks. International Journal of Ad Hoc and Ubiquitous Computing, 2(1/2), 73–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Xu, Y., & Qi, H. (2008). Mobile agent migration modeling and design for target tracking in wireless sensor networks. Ad Hoc Networks, 6(1), 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Shakshuki, E., Malik, H., & Denko, M. K. (2008). Software agent-based directed diffusion in wireless sensor network. Telecommunication Systems, 38(3–4), 161–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Konstantopoulos, C., Mpitziopoulos, A., Gavalas, D., & Pantziou, D. (2009). Effective determination of mobile agent itineraries for data aggregation on sensor networks. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 22(12), 1679–1693.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Gavalas, D., Mpitziopoulos, A., Pantziou, G., & Konstantopoulos, C. (2010). An approach for near-optimal distributed data fusion in wireless sensor networks. Wireless Networks, 16(5), 1407–1425.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Mpitziopoulos, A., Gavalas, D., Konstantopoulos, C., & Pantziou, G. (2010). CBID: A scalable method for distributed data aggregation in WSNs. International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks, 6(1), 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Chen, M., Yang, L. T., Kwon, T., Zhou, L., & Jo, M. (2011). Itinerary planning for energy-efficient agent communications in wireless sensor networks. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 60(7), 3290–3299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Cai, W., Chen, M., Hara, T., Shu, L., & Kwon, T. (2011). A genetic algorithm approach to multi-agent itinerary planning in wireless sensor network’s. Mobile Networks and Applications, 16(6), 782–793.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Aloui, I., Kazar, O., Kahloul, L., & Servigne, S. (2015). A new itinerary planning approach among multiple mobile agents in wireless sensor networks (WSN) to reduce energy consumption. International Journal of Communication Networks and Information Security, 7(2), 116–122.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Vijayalakshmi, A., & Bhuvaneswari, V. (2016). Mobile agent based optimal data gathering in wireless sensor networks. In 10th IEEE international conference on intelligent systems and control (ISCO) (pp. 1–4).

  32. Lohani, D., & Varma, S. (2016). Energy efficient data aggregation in mobile agent based wireless sensor network. Wireless Personal Communications, 89(4), 1165–1176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Qadori, H. Q., Zukarnain, Z. A., Hanapi, Z. M., & Subramaniam, S. (2018). FuMAM: Fuzzy- based mobile agent migration approach for data gathering in wireless sensor networks. IEEE Access, 6, 15643–15652.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. El Fissaoui, M., Beni-Hssane, A., & Saadi, M. (2018). Multi-mobile agent itinerary planning-based energy and fault aware data aggregation in wireless sensor networks. EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking, 2018(1), 1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Verma, S., Sood, N., & Sharma, A. K. (2019). A novelistic approach for energy efficient routing using single and multiple data sinks in heterogeneous wireless sensor network. Peer-to-Peer Networking and Applications, 12(5), 1110–1136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Verma, S., Sood, N., & Sharma, A. K. (2019). Genetic algorithm-based optimized cluster head selection for single and multiple data sinks in heterogeneous wireless sensor network. Applied Soft Computing, 85, 105788.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Computer Science and Engineering, GB Pant Institute of Engineering and Technology, Pauri Garhwal, Uttarakhand, India

    Neha Barthwal & Shashi Kant Verma

Authors
  1. Neha Barthwal
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  2. Shashi Kant Verma
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Neha Barthwal.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Barthwal, N., Verma, S.K. An Optimized Routing Algorithm for Enhancing Scalability of Wireless Sensor Network. Wireless Pers Commun 117, 2359–2382 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-020-07978-9

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-020-07978-9

Keywords