Skip to main content
Log in

SAED: Self-adaptive Error Detection Automation for Leveraging Computational Efficiency of HCI Systems

  • Published:
Wireless Personal Communications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The human–computer interaction (HCI) system is one of the state-of-art consolidations of intellectual psychology and computer automation technology in the recent era. An organized HCI focuses on designing intelligent and competent processing systems for interaction through human–reciprocation. Processing efficiency and computational precision of intelligent systems unambiguously rely on user interfaces. The improper access to user interfaces results in error-prone responses and hence the computation increases in account of better accuracy. In this manuscript, the self-adaptive error detection (SAED) automation method is introduced for leveraging the computation precision of HCI systems. SAED harmonizes a bi-linear learning process based on Bayes classification subsided by a cumulative distribution function (CDF). CDF defines the maximum error unleashing probability of the inputs to recognize certain computations. Bayes classification regresses the decisive computation as a reference to classify inputs by detaining errors to provide more relevant suggestions as a part of automation. SAED results in non-trivial input processing to enhance the choice of HCI integrated into intelligent computing systems. This method focuses on improving the prediction of inputs by reducing error, computation time, and memory overloading. The errors and memory overloading due to improper and partially classified inputs and convergence are thwarted using this method. The specular conduct of SAED is gauged using experimental modeling and error detection rate, predicted inputs, and distribution function metrics are analyzed. The proposed method is found to achieve 13.61% less completion time, 5.63% less error, and 19.29% less memory consumption, respectively.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Sanz-Robinson, J., Moy, T., Huang, L., Rieutort-Louis, W., Hu, Y., Wagner, S., et al. (2017). Large-area electronics: A platform for next-generation human–computer interfaces. IEEE Journal on Emerging and Selected Topics in Circuits and Systems, 7(1), 38–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Mohamed, S. R., & Raviraj, P. (2020). Optimisation of multi-body fishbot undulatory swimming speed based on SOLEIL and BhT simulators. International Journal of Intelligence and Sustainable Computing, 1(1), 19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Li, M., Wei, J., Zheng, X., & Bolton, M. L. (2017). A formal machine-learning approach to generating human–machine interfaces from task models. IEEE Transactions on Human–Machine Systems, 47(6), 822–833.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Quintas, J., Martins, G. S., Santos, L., Menezes, P., & Dias, J. (2019). Toward a context-aware human–robot interaction framework based on cognitive development. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems, 49(1), 227–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Aydin, Y., Tokatli, O., Patoglu, V., & Basdogan, C. (2018). Stable physical human–robot interaction using fractional order admittance control. IEEE Transactions on Haptics, 11(3), 464–475.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ke, Q., Bennamoun, M., An, S., Sohel, F., & Boussaid, F. (2018). Leveraging structural context models and ranking score fusion for human interaction prediction. IEEE Transactions on Multimedia, 20(7), 1712–1723.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Mukherjee, D., & Reddy, B. V. R. (2020). Design and development of a novel MOSFET structure for reduction of reverse bias pn junction leakage current. International Journal of Intelligence and Sustainable Computing, 1(1), 32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Thenkumari, K., & Sakthidasan, K. (2019). Frequency reconfigurable micro strip antenna switching techniques for sustainable environment. Journal of Green Engineering, 9(4), 1814–1820.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Xu, Z., Wang, R., Yue, X., Liu, T., Chen, C., & Fang, S. H. (2018). FaceME: Face-to-machine proximity estimation based on RSSI difference for mobile industrial human–machine interaction. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, 14(8), 3547–3558.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Shen, C., Chen, Y., Liu, Y., & Guan, X. (2018). Adaptive human–machine interactive behavior analysis with wrist-worn devices for password inference. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems, 99, 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Yan, Z., Duan, N., Bao, J., Chen, P., Zhou, M., & Li, Z. (2018). Response selection from unstructured documents for human–computer conversation systems. Knowledge-Based Systems, 142, 149–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Domínguez, C., Martínez, J. M., Busquets-Mataix, J. V., & Hassan, H. (2018). Human–computer cooperation platform for developing real-time robotic applications. The Journal of Supercomputing, 75, 1849–1868.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Ehrenbrink, P., & Möller, S. (2018). Development of a reactance scale for human–computer interaction. Quality and User Experience, 3(1), 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Wu, X., Wu, C., Wei, D., & Xiao, Y. (2019). Alternative computer mouse trigger designs in computerized physician order entry (CPOE) system to reduce clinicians’ drop-down menu selection errors. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 71, 14–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Ding, Z., Qiu, H., Yang, R., Jiang, C., & Zhou, M. (2019). Interactive-control-model for human–computer interactive system based on petri nets. IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering, 16(4), 1800–1813.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Vojtech, J. M., Cler, G. J., & Stepp, C. E. (2018). Prediction of optimal facial electromyographic sensor configurations for human–machine interface control. IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering, 26(8), 1566–1576.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Zhang, S., & Zhang, S. (2019). A novel human–3DTV interaction system based on free hand gestures and a touch-based virtual interface. IEEE Access, 7, 165961–165973.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Zeng, Q., Jiang, B., & Duan, Q. (2019). Integrated evaluation of hardware and software interfaces for automotive human–machine interaction. IET Cyber-Physical Systems: Theory & Applications, 4(3), 214–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Jiang, J., Wang, Y., Zhang, L., Wu, D., Li, M., Xie, T., et al. (2018). A cognitive reliability model research for complex digital human–computer interface of industrial system. Safety Science, 108, 196–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sakthidasan Krishnan.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Krishnan, S., Vaithyasubramanian, S. & Maragatharajan, M. SAED: Self-adaptive Error Detection Automation for Leveraging Computational Efficiency of HCI Systems. Wireless Pers Commun 117, 3289–3307 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-020-07988-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-020-07988-7

Keywords

Navigation