Skip to main content
Log in

Performance Analysis of Robust GRCR Based Spectrum Detector Using Compressed Sensing with Non-reconstruction Model

  • Published:
Wireless Personal Communications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In cognitive radio applications, a robust detector is essentially required for the determination of spectrum sensing. Gerschgorin radii and centers ratio (GRCR) detector is a robust detector for cooperative spectrum sensing techniques. Covariance matrix generates the test statistics for signal established from one or supplementary sources. Though the method is robust against noise uncertainty, it is not suitable for wideband sensing due to the complexity associated with the computation of covariance matrix. To tackle this challenge of extensive communication cost and high processing time complexity, an efficient GRCR detector using compressive sensing with non-reconstruction is proposed here. This method introduces relevance for multiple received signals by using same measurement matrix to all received signals. Computational complexity is analysed and the proposed method is compared with the existing method through ROC simulations, and it shown that the proposed method performs better even in the low SNR range of -20 dB. Throughput analysis is validated through simulations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Guimaraes, D. A. (2018). Robust test statistic for cooperative spectrum sensing based on the gerschgorin circle theorem. IEEE Access Feb, 2018.

  2. Salahdine, F., Kaabouch, N., & El Ghazi, H. (2016). A survey on compressive sensing techniques for cognitive radio networks. Journal of Physics Communications, 20, 61–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Haupt, J., & Nowak, R. (2007). Compressive sampling for signal detection. In Proceedings of IEEE international conference on acoustics, speech signal processing, Honolulu, HI, USA, Apr. 2007, pp. III-1509–III-1512.

  4. Mitola, J. III. (2000). Cognitive radio: An integrated agent architecture for software defined radio. Ph.D. dissertation, KTH Roy. Inst. Technol., Stockholm, Sweden, May.

  5. Davenport, M. A., Boufounos, P. T., Wakin, M. B., & Baraniuk, R. G. (2010). Signal processing with compressive measurements. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing, 4(2), 445–460.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Hong, S. (2010). Direct spectrum sensing from compressed measurements. In Proceedings of Military Communications Conference, San Jose, CA, USA, pp. 1187–1192.

  7. Sharma, S. K., Lagunas, E., Chatzinotas, S., & Ottersten, B. (2016). Application of compressive sensing in cognitive radio communications: A survey. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 18(3), 1838–1860.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Yucek, T., & Arslam, H. (2009). A survey of spectrum sensing algorithms for cognitive radio applications. Proceedings of the IEEE, 97(5), 805–823.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Darney, P. E., & Jacob, I. J. (2019). Performance enhancements of cognitive radio networks using the improved fuzzy logic. Journal of Soft Computing Paradigm (JSCP), 1(02), 57–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Liang, Y.-C., Zeng, Y., Peh, E. C. Y., & Hoang, A. T. (2008). Sensing-throughput tradeoff for cognitive radio networks. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 7(4), 1326–1337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Zeng, Y., & Liang, Y.-C. (2009). Eigenvalue-based spectrum sensing algorithms for cognitive radio. IEEE Transactions on Communications, 57(6), 1784–1793.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Gao, Y., Chen, Y., Ma, Y., He, C., & Su, L. (2016). Eigenvalue-based spectrum sensing for multiple received signals under the non-reconstruction framework of compressed sensing. IEEE Access.

  13. Valanarasu, R., & Christy, A. (2019). Comprehensive survey of wireless cognitive and 5G networks. Journal of Ubiquitous Computing and Communication Technologies (UCCT), 1, 23–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Haoxiang, W. (2019). Multi-objective optimization algorithm for power management in cognitive radio networks. Journal of Ubiquitous Computing and Communication Technologies (UCCT), 1(02), 97–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Bindhu, V. (2020). Constraints mitigation in cognitive radio networks using cloud computing. Journal of Trends in Computer Science and Smart technology (TCSST), 2(01), 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

No funding.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chettiyar Vani Vivekanand.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

No conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Vivekanand, C.V., Bhoopathy Bagan, K. Performance Analysis of Robust GRCR Based Spectrum Detector Using Compressed Sensing with Non-reconstruction Model. Wireless Pers Commun 119, 2165–2184 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-021-08324-3

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-021-08324-3

Keywords