Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Void Hole Avoidance Based on Sink Mobility and Adaptive Two Hop Vector-Based Forwarding in Underwater Wireless Sensor Networks

  • Published:
Wireless Personal Communications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Underwater Wireless Sensor Network (UWSN) accomplishes the consideration of a few scientists and academicians towards itself. Because of the brutality of the climate lies submerged represents various difficulties, i.e., high transmission delay, outstanding piece mistake rate, more expense in usage, sinks development and energy imperatives, unequal surface highlights of an area and low data transfer capacity, and so forth Void opening evasion is compulsory for to motivation behind limiting the utilization of energy and amplifying throughput and region inclusion. In this exploration work, the creator planned plans for void opening shirking initial one is, Avoiding Void Hole Adaptive Hop by Hop Vector-Based Forwarding (AVH-AHH-VBF) in submerged remote sensor organization and a second plan for limiting utilization of energy and expanding the lifetime of the organization, Sink Mobility-Adaptive Hop by Hop Vector-Based Forwarding (SM-AHH-VBF). Reproduction results show that our plans beat contrasted and standard arrangement as far as normal Packet Delivery Ratio (PDR), energy charge. Our reproduction confirms the effectiveness of our proposed procedure AVH-AHH-VBF equivalents to 0.17 and SM-AHH-VBF equivalents to 0.24 regarding normal PDR, AVH-AHH-VBF equivalents to 24j and SM-AHH-VBF equivalents to 5j for the normal energy charge, AVH-AHH-VBF had a tradeoff of 63% in light of considering two jumps and SM-AHH-VBF approaches 20% tradeoff for normal start to finish.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Yisa, A. G., Dargahi, T., Belguith, S., & Hammoudeh, M. (2020). Security challenges of internet of underwater things: A systematic literature review. Transactions on Emerging Telecommunications Technologies, 32, e4203

    Google Scholar 

  2. Yan, L., He, Y., & Huangfu, Z. (2021). An uneven node self-deployment optimization algorithm for maximized coverage and energy balance in underwater wireless sensor networks. Sensors, 21, 1368

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Gupta, O., & Goyal, N. (2021). The evolution of data gathering static and mobility models in underwater wireless sensor networks: A survey. Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing, 12, 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Kheirabadi, M. T., & Mohamad, M. M. (2013). Greedy routing in underwater acoustic sensor networks: A survey. International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks, 9, 701834

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Al-Bzoor, M., Al-assem, E., Alawneh, L., & Jararweh, Y. (2021). Autonomous underwater vehicles support for enhanced performance in the Internet of underwater things. Transactions on Emerging Telecommunications Technologies, 32, e4225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Coutinho, R. W., Boukerche, A., Vieira, L. F., & Loureiro, A. A. (2015). Geographic and opportunistic routing for underwater sensor networks. IEEE Transactions on Computers, 65, 548–561

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Coutinho, R. W., Boukerche, A., Vieira, L. F., Loureiro, A. A. (2014) GEDAR: geographic and opportunistic routing protocol with depth adjustment for mobile underwater sensor networks, In 2014 IEEE International Conference on communications (ICC), pp. 251-256.

  8. Nazareth, P., & Chandavarkar, B. (2021). Void-Aware Routing Protocols for Underwater Communication Networks: A Survey. Evolutionary Computing and Mobile Sustainable Networks, 53, 747–760.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Yu, S., Liu, S., & Jiang, P. (2016). A high-efficiency uneven cluster deployment algorithm based on network layered for event coverage in UWSNs. Sensors, 16, 2103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Hussain, T., Rehman, Z. U., Iqbal, A., Saeed, K., & Ali, I. (2020). Two hop verification for avoiding void hole in underwater wireless sensor network using SM-AHH-VBF and AVH-AHH-VBF routing protocols. Transactions on Emerging Telecommunications Technologies, 31, e3992

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Jin, Z., Wang, X., & Liu, Z. (2016). Relay selection and optimization algorithm of power allocation based on channel delay for UWSN. International Journal of Future Generation Communication and Networking, 9, 103–112

    Google Scholar 

  12. Bandyopadhyay, D., & Sen, J. (2011). Internet of things: Applications and challenges in technology and standardization. Wireless Personal Communications, 58, 49–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Xiong, Z., Wang, H., Zhang, L., Fan, T., & Shen, J. (2020). A ring-based routing scheme for distributed energy resources management in IIoT. IEEE Access, 8, 167490–167503

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Butt, S. A., Bakar, K. A., Javaid, N., Gharaei, N., Ishmanov, F., Afzal, M. K., et al. (2019). Exploiting layered multi-path routing protocols to avoid void hole regions for reliable data delivery and efficient energy management for IoT-enabled underwater WSNs. Sensors, 19, 510

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Han, G., Wang, H., Ansere, J. A., Jiang, J., & Peng, Y. (2020). SSLP: A stratification-based source location privacy scheme in underwater acoustic sensor networks. IEEE Network, 34, 188–195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Gola, K. K., Gupta, B. (2021) Underwater acoustic sensor networks: An energy efficient and void avoidance routing based on grey wolf optimization algorithm. Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering, pp. 1–16.

  17. Awais, M., Javaid,N., Naseer, N., Imran, M. (2019) Exploiting energy efficient routing protocols for Void Hole Alleviation in IoT enabled Underwater WSN, In 2019 15th International Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing Conference (IWCMC), pp. 1797–1802.

  18. Nguyen, K.-V., Nguyen, C.-H., Le Nguyen, P., Van Do, T., & Chlamtac, I. (2021). Energy-efficient routing in the proximity of a complicated hole in wireless sensor networks. Wireless Networks, 27, 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Yu, H., Yao, N., & Liu, J. (2015). An adaptive routing protocol in underwater sparse acoustic sensor networks. Ad Hoc Networks, 34, 121–143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Ahmed, S., Javaid, N., Ahmad, A., Ahmed, I., Durrani, M. Y., Ali, A., et al. (2016). SPARCO: stochastic performance analysis with reliability and cooperation for underwater wireless sensor networks. Journal of Sensors, 2016, 1–17

    Google Scholar 

  21. Noh, Y., Lee, U., Lee, S., Wang, P., Vieira, L. F., Cui, J.-H., et al. (2015). Hydrocast: Pressure routing for underwater sensor networks. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 65, 333–347

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Osorio, D. P. M., Olivo, E. E. B., Alves, H., Santos Filho, J. C. S., & Latva-aho, M. (2016). An adaptive transmission scheme for amplify-and-forward relaying networks. IEEE Transactions on Communications, 65, 66–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Abbas, M. Z., Bakar, K. A., Ayaz, M., Mohamed, M. H., & Tariq, M. (2017). Hop-by-Hop dynamic addressing based routing protocol for monitoring of long range underwater pipeline. KSII Transactions on Internet and Information Systems, 11, 1237–1253

    Google Scholar 

  24. Rao, P. S., Jana, P. K., & Banka, H. (2017). A particle swarm optimization based energy efficient cluster head selection algorithm for wireless sensor networks. Wireless Networks, 23, 2005–2020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Sher, A., Khan, A., Javaid, N., Ahmed, S. H., Aalsalem, M. Y., & Khan, W. Z. (2018). Void hole avoidance for reliable data delivery in IoT enabled underwater wireless sensor networks. Sensors, 18, 3271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Yadav, S., & Kumar, V. (2017). Optimal clustering in underwater wireless sensor networks: Acoustic, EM and FSO communication compliant technique. IEEE Access, 5, 12761–12776

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Shah, M., Wadud, Z., Sher, A., Ashraf, M., Khan, Z. A., & Javaid, N. (2018). Position adjustment–based location error–resilient geo-opportunistic routing for void hole avoidance in underwater sensor networks. Concurrency and Computation: Practice and Experience, 30, e4772

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Javaid, N., Shah, M., Ahmad, A., Imran, M., Khan, M. I., & Vasilakos, A. V. (2016). An enhanced energy balanced data transmission protocol for underwater acoustic sensor networks. Sensors, 16, 487

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Kumar Gola, K., Dhingra, M., & Gupta, B. (2020). Void hole avoidance routing algorithm for underwater sensor networks. IET Communications, 14, 3837–3844

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Sher, A., Javaid, N., Azam, I., Ahmad, H., Abdul, W., Ghouzali, S., et al. (2017). Monitoring square and circular fields with sensors using energy-efficient cluster-based routing for underwater wireless sensor networks. International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks, 13, 1550147717717189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Hussain, A., Hussain, T., Ali, I., & Khan, M. R. (2020). Impact of sparse and dense deployment of nodes under different propagation models in manets. ADCAIJ Advances in Distributed Computing and Artificial Intelligence Journal, 9, 61–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Key Research and Development Program of Zhejiang Province under Grant 2020C01076, and by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant 62072403.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Computer Sciences and Information Technology, The University of Agriculture Peshawar, Peshawar, Pakistan

    Zia Ur Rehman & Arshad Iqbal

  2. School of Computer Science and Information Engineering, Zhejiang Gongshang University, Hangzhou, China

    Bailin Yang & Tariq Hussain

Authors
  1. Zia Ur Rehman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Arshad Iqbal
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Bailin Yang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Tariq Hussain
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

All the authors contributed to this research.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tariq Hussain.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ur Rehman, Z., Iqbal, A., Yang, B. et al. Void Hole Avoidance Based on Sink Mobility and Adaptive Two Hop Vector-Based Forwarding in Underwater Wireless Sensor Networks. Wireless Pers Commun 120, 1417–1447 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-021-08518-9

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-021-08518-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation