Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Improving Positioning Accuracy Using Optimization Approaches: A Survey, Research Challenges and Future Perspectives

  • Published:
Wireless Personal Communications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The current onboard wireless and sensors technologies have a significant role in improving day-to-day users’ activities. Examples of these technologies are WiFi, Bluetooth, Cellular, Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS), proximity, camera, and inertial sensors. Using these technologies provides many applications from the range of communication to the location-based systems (LBS). The LBSs locate people and objects from outdoors into indoors for many purposes, including navigation, entertainment services, and even for security issues. However, the most notable limitations of these technologies include a lack of accuracy and cost-efficiency. Several research types have been attempted to tackle these issues by combining the various technologies, using smart models, and applying optimization algorithms. Therefore, this study reviews many models on the shelf and analyzes the models according to their improvement of accuracy, reduction of time to fix, and cost-efficiency. Specifically, in this study, the optimization algorithms used for positioning purposes are investigated and classified into two groups of algorithms: statistical and non-statistical algorithms. Further, the study also illustrates the weaknesses and limitations of the surveyed algorithms. Finally, the famous challenges and future trends are listed to provide a useful guide for the current readers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. C. Tiberius and E. Verbree, “GNSS positioning accuracy and availability within Location Based Services: The advantages of combined GPS-Galileo positioning,” NaviTec, no. 1, 2004.

  2. C. Stallo et al., “GNSS-based location determination system architecture for railway performance assessment in presence of local effects,” in 2018 IEEE/ION Position, Location and Navigation Symposium (PLANS), Apr. 2018, pp. 374–381, doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/PLANS.2018.8373403.

  3. K. Zhang, M. Spanghero, and P. Papadimitratos, “Protecting GNSS-based Services using Time Offset Validation,” in 2020 IEEE/ION Position, Location and Navigation Symposium (PLANS), Apr. 2020, pp. 575–583, doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/PLANS46316.2020.9110224.

  4. J. Paziewski, “Recent advances and perspectives for positioning and applications with smartphone GNSS observations,” Meas. Sci. Technol., vol. 31, no. 9, 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6501/ab8a7d.

  5. S. Tomažič and I. Škrjanc, “Bluetooth localization based on fuzzy models and particle swarm optimization,” 2017 Int. Conf. Indoor Position. Indoor Navig. IPIN 2017, vol. 2017-Janua, pp. 1–8, 2017, doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/IPIN.2017.8115880.

  6. A. A. Abdallah, S. S. Saab, and Z. M. Kassas, “A machine learning approach for localization in cellular environments,” 2018 IEEE/ION Position, Locat. Navig. Symp. PLANS 2018 - Proc., pp. 1223–1227, 2018, doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/PLANS.2018.8373508.

  7. W. Yao and L. Ma, “Research and application of indoor positioning method based on fixed infrared beacon,” Chinese Control Conf. CCC, vol. 2018-July, pp. 5375–5379, 2018, doi: https://doi.org/10.23919/ChiCC.2018.8482658.

  8. Maghdid, S. A., Maghdid, H. S., HmaSalah, S. R., Ghafoor, K. Z., Sadiq, A. S., & Khan, S. (2019). Indoor human tracking mechanism using integrated onboard smartphones Wi-Fi device and inertial sensors. Telecommunication Systems, 71(3), 447–458. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11235-018-0517-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. P. Dabove, V. Di Pietra, M. Piras, A. A. Jabbar, and S. A. Kazim, “Indoor positioning using Ultra-wide band (UWB) technologies: Positioning accuracies and sensors’ performances,” 2018 IEEE/ION Position, Locat. Navig. Symp. PLANS 2018 - Proc., pp. 175–184, 2018, doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/PLANS.2018.8373379.

  10. C. Shih and C. Liang, “The improvement of indoor localization precision through partial least square(PLS) and swarm(PSO) methods,” 2018 IEEE Sensors Appl. Symp. SAS 2018 - Proc., vol. 2018-Janua, pp. 1–6, 2018, doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/SAS.2018.8336749.

  11. J. Fan, S. Chen, X. Luo, Y. Zhang, and G. Y. Li, “A Machine Learning Approach for Hierarchical Localization based on Multipath MIMO Fingerprints,” IEEE Commun. Lett., vol. PP, no. 1, p. 1, 2019, doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/LCOMM.2019.2929148.

  12. H. J. Bae and L. Choi, “Large-Scale Indoor Positioning using Geomagnetic Field with Deep Neural Networks,” IEEE Int. Conf. Commun., vol. 2019-May, pp. 1–6, 2019, doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/ICC.2019.8761118.

  13. Zhu, X., Qu, W., Qiu, T., Zhao, L., Atiquzzaman, M., & Wu, D. O. (2020). Indoor Intelligent Fingerprint-Based Localization: Principles, Approaches and Challenges. IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutorials, 22(4), 2634–2657. https://doi.org/10.1109/COMST.2020.3014304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Yu, L., & Liu, H. (2003). “Feature Selection for High-Dimensional Data: A Fast Correlation-Based Filter Solution”, Proceedings. Twent. Int. Conf. Mach. Learn., 2, 856–863.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Song, Y., & Hsu, L. T. (2021). Tightly coupled integrated navigation system via factor graph for UAV indoor localization. Aerospace Science and Technology, 108, 106370. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2020.106370

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. C. Lamoureux and R. Chelouah, “Fusion particle and fingerprint recognition for indoor positioning system on mobile,” Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell., vol. 98, no. October 2020, p. 104082, 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2020.104082.

  17. Gu, T., Tang, Y., Wang, R., Lu, L., Wang, Z., & Chang, L. (2019). “Indoor Localization Fusion Algorithm Based on Signal Filtering optimization of Multi-sensor”, 11th Int. Conf. Adv. Comput. Intell. ICACI, 2019, 250–255. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICACI.2019.8778463

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. W. Liu, Y. Xiong, X. Zong, and W. Siwei, “Trilateration Positioning Optimization Algorithm Based on Minimum Generalization Error,” in 2018 IEEE 4th International Symposium on Wireless Systems within the International Conferences on Intelligent Data Acquisition and Advanced Computing Systems (IDAACS-SWS), 2018, pp. 154–157, doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/IDAACS-SWS.2018.8525748.

  19. T. M. Phuong, Z. Lin, and R. B. Altman, “Supplementary website :,” Bioinformatics, 2005.

  20. Q. bin Zhang, P. Wang, and Z. hai Chen, “An improved particle filter for mobile robot localization based on particle swarm optimization,” Expert Syst. Appl., vol. 135, pp. 181–193, 2019, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2019.06.006.

  21. H. Andrew and R. Nicholas, “The robotics data set repository (Radish).” Dataset, 2003.

  22. Wang, J., Wang, P., & Chen, Z. (2018). A novel qualitative motion model based probabilistic indoor global localization method. Inf. Sci. (Ny), 429, 284–295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2017.11.025

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. L. Zhang, R. Zapata, and P. Lépinay, “Self-adaptive Monte Carlo localization for mobile robots using range sensors,” in 2009 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, Oct. 2009, pp. 1541–1546, doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/IROS.2009.5354298.

  24. Y. Guo, “Application of Improved Ant Colony Algorithm in Indoor Location,” 2019 IEEE 5th Int. Conf. Comput. Commun. ICCC 2019, pp. 1935–1939, 2019, doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCC47050.2019.9064277

  25. H. Eldeeb, M. Arafa, and M. T. F. Saidahmed, “Optimal placement of access points for indoor positioning using a genetic algorithm,” Proc. ICCES 2017 12th Int. Conf. Comput. Eng. Syst., vol. 2018-Janua, pp. 306–313, 2018, doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCES.2017.8275323.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Aos Mulahuwaish.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors of this paper have declared that, The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose. The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare that are relevant to the content of this article. All authors certify that they have no affiliations with or involvement in any organization or entity with any financial interest or non-financial interest in the subject matter or materials discussed in this manuscript. The authors have no financial or proprietary interests in any material discussed in this article.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Asaad, S.M., Potrus, M.Y., Ghafoor, K.Z. et al. Improving Positioning Accuracy Using Optimization Approaches: A Survey, Research Challenges and Future Perspectives. Wireless Pers Commun 122, 3393–3409 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-021-09090-y

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-021-09090-y

Keywords

Navigation