Skip to main content
Log in

Robust Mixed \(\text {H}_{2} / \text {H}_{\infty }\) Power Control Algorithm for Cognitive Radio Networks

  • Published:
Wireless Personal Communications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, a basic dynamical state-space system model with two state feedback controllers and tracking signal-to-interference-plus-noise (SINR) of secondary user (SU) and interference to primary user (PU) generated from the whole secondary user (SUs) is proposed based on the automatic control framework to guarantee the quality of service (QoS) both primary user (PU) and SU in underlay cognitive radio communication network, which considers the constraint of the average interference temperature. On the above foundation, a delay state-space model with the constraint of the weighted interference temperature is proposed under the time delay, multiple access interference (MAI), channel fading, measurement errors, and uncertain noise. Moreover, the robust mixed \(\text {H}_{2} / \text {H}_{\infty }\) power tracking algorithm (RPCA) with adaptive step is proposed to obtain a robust optimal SU’s SINR tracking error under the minimization the worst-case and the minimum interference to PU tracking error, which can compensate the effects of the above factors. In comparison with the conventional power control algorithm (CPCA), the proposed mixed \(\text {H}_{2} / \text {H}_{\infty }\) RPCA can ensure the communication quality of SUs and reduce the interference to PU from the all SUs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Force FSPT (2002). Report of the spectrum efficiency working group. https://www.fcc.gov/sptf/files/SEWGFinalReport_1.pdf.

  2. Mitola, J., & Maguire, G. Q. (1999). Cognitive radio: Making software radios more personal. IEEE Personal Communications, 6(4), 13–18. https://doi.org/10.1109/98.788210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Haykin, S. (2005). Cognitive radio: Brain-empowered wireless communications. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 23(2), 201–220. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSAC.2004.839380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Mokari, N., Parsaeefard, S., Azmi, P., Saeedi, H., & Hossain, E. (2016). Robust ergodic uplink resource allocation in underlay ofdma cognitive radio networks. IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing, 15(2), 419–431. https://doi.org/10.1109/TMC.2015.2413782.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Ozcan, G., & Gursoy, M. C. (2015). Optimal power control for underlay cognitive radio systems with arbitrary input distributions. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 14(8), 4219–4233. https://doi.org/10.1109/TWC.2015.2418208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Le, L. B., & Hossain, E. (2008). Resource allocation for spectrum underlay in cognitive radio networks. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 7(12), 5306–5315. https://doi.org/10.1109/T-WC.2008.070890.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Sim, M. L., Gunawan, E., Soh, C. B., Soong, B. H. (1998). Study on the characteristics of predictive closed-loop power control algorithms for a cellular ds/cdma system. In: ICUPC ’98. IEEE 1998 International Conference on Universal Personal Communications. Conference Proceedings (Cat. No.98TH8384), vol 2, pp 981–985 vol.2, https://doi.org/10.1109/ICUPC.1998.733653.

  8. Hsuan-Jung, Su., & Geraniotis, E. (2002). Adaptive closed-loop power control with quantized feedback and loop filtering. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 1(1), 76–86. https://doi.org/10.1109/7693.975447.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Rintamaki, M., Koivo, H., & Hartimo, I. (2004). Adaptive closed-loop power control algorithms for cdma cellular communication systems. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 53(6), 1756–1768. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVT.2004.836937.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Yang, G., Li, B., Tan, X., & Wang, X. (2015). Adaptive power control algorithm in cognitive radio based on game theory. IET Communications, 9(15), 1807–1811.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Lee, B., Chen, Y., & Chen, B. (2006). Robust \(\text{ h}_infty\)power control for cdma cellular communication systems. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 54(10), 3947–3956. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSP.2006.880237.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Junhui, Z., Tao, Y., Yi, G., Jiao, W., & Lei, F. (2013). Power control algorithm of cognitive radio based on non-cooperative game theory. China Communications, 10(11), 143–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Chen, L., & Zhao, X. (2016). An improved power control afsa for minimum interference to primary users in cognitive radio networks. Wireless Personal Communications, 87(1), 293–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kuo, Y., Yang, J., & Chen, J. (2013). Efficient swarm intelligent algorithm for power control game in cognitive radio networks. Iet Communications, 7(11), 1089–1098.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Gong, S., Wang, P., & Duan, L. (2015). Distributed power control with robust protection for pus in cognitive radio networks. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 14(6), 3247–3258. https://doi.org/10.1109/TWC.2015.2403357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Yang, L., Sagduyu, Y. E., Zhang, J., Li, J. H. (2011). Distributed power control for ad-hoc communications via stochastic nonconvex utility optimization. In: 2011 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC), IEEE, pp 1–5.

  17. Xu, Y., & Zhao, X. (2015). Distributed power control for multiuser cognitive radio networks with quality of service and interference temperature constraints. Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing, 15(14), 1773–1783.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Chen, L., Li, Q., Zhao, X., Fang, Z., Peng, F., & Wang, J. (2019). Multi-population coevolutionary dynamic multi-objective particle swarm optimization algorithm for power control based on improved crowding distance archive management in crns. Computer Communications, 145, 146–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. de Sousa, Chaves F., Abbas-Turki, M., Abou-Kandil, H., & Romano, J. M. T. (2013). Transmission power control for opportunistic qos provision in wireless networks. IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, 21(2), 315–331. https://doi.org/10.1109/TCST.2011.2181080.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. De Oliveira, M. C., Geromel, J. C., & Bernussou, J. (2002). Extended h 2 and h norm characterizations and controller parametrizations for discrete-time systems. International Journal of Control, 75(9), 666–679.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  21. Sun, C., Alemseged, Y. D., Tran, H. N., & Harada, H. (2010). Transmit power control for cognitive radio over a rayleigh fading channel. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 59(4), 1847–1857. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVT.2009.2037913.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Setoodeh, P., & Haykin, S. (2009). Robust transmit power control for cognitive radio. Proceedings of the IEEE, 97(5), 915–939. https://doi.org/10.1109/JPROC.2009.2015718.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work is supported in part by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under grant no. 61571209 and 61501059, Science and Technology Department of Jilin Provincial, China (Grant No. 20180101336JC) scientific research fund of Jilin Provincial Education Department, China (Grant No. 2016134), outstanding youth fund of Jilin City Science and Technology Bureau, China (Grant No. 20166019), scientific research project of Jilin Institute of Chemical Technology, China (Grant No. 2015128(D)), and major scientific research project of Jilin Institute of Chemical Technology, China (Grant No. 2015010).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yuwei Chen.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix A

Appendix A

1.1 Channel Model

The above \(g_{i i}(k)\), \(g_{j i}(k)\), \(g_{l i}(k)\) are time-varying power transmission gains in wireless communication channel, which are collectively called \(g_{l i}(k)\). It is composed of long-term fading \(g_{l f}(k)\) and short-term fading \(g_{s f}(k)\)[14] . Thus we have

$$\begin{aligned} g(k)=g_{l f}(k)+g_{s f}(k) \end{aligned}$$
(45)

The short-term fading \(g_{s f}(k)\) is fast power fluctuations caused by the motion of PUs and SUs, and follow the Rayleigh distribution.

The long-term fading \(g_{l f}(k)\) includes an associated with distance-dependent path loss and a shadow fading caused by barriers of the transmission link, it can be expressed as

$$\begin{aligned} g_{l f}(k)=g_{0}-10 \alpha \log _{10}(D)+S(k) \end{aligned}$$
(46)

where \(g_{0}\) represents the path loss at the reference distance and is a constant. D is the distance of transmitter and receiver. \(\alpha\) is path loss factor. The shadow fading S(k) is and has logarithmic normal distribution characteristics in signal level. It can be seen as a first order autorgressive model [AR(1)]–filtered gaussian white noise. The models of the shadow fading S(k) and corresponding autocorrelation function \(R_{s}(k)\) are given as

$$\begin{aligned} S(k)= & {} \exp \left( \frac{\ln (\beta ) v(k) T_{s}}{D_{e}}\right) S(k-1)+n(k-1) \end{aligned}$$
(47)
$$\begin{aligned} R_{s}(k)= & {} \sigma _{s}^{2}(k) \exp \left( \frac{\ln (\beta ) v(k) T_{s}}{D_{e}}\right) ^{|k|} \end{aligned}$$
(48)

where \(\beta\) denotes autocorrelation coefficient between receiver and transmitter at distance \(D_{e}\) , v(k) is velocity of the mobile terminal at time slot k, \(T_{s}\) is the sampling period, \(n(k-1)\) is a white Gaussian process of the zero mean value at time slot \(k-1\) and variance

$$\begin{aligned} \sigma _{n}^{2}(k)=\left( 1-\left[ \exp \left( \frac{\ln (\beta ) v(k) T_{s}}{D_{e}}\right) \right] ^{2}\right) \sigma _{s}^{2}(k) \end{aligned}$$
(49)

at time slot k. The \(\sigma _{s}(k)\) represents standard deviation of the shadow fading at time slot in the actual communication environment.

Short-term fading is caused by channel fading fast power fluctuations and follow the Rayleigh distribution, short-term fading by famous Jack model simulation in this paper.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chen, L., Chen, Y., Li, Q. et al. Robust Mixed \(\text {H}_{2} / \text {H}_{\infty }\) Power Control Algorithm for Cognitive Radio Networks. Wireless Pers Commun 123, 135–163 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-021-09123-6

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-021-09123-6

Keywords

Navigation