Abstract
In this paper, a basic dynamical state-space system model with two state feedback controllers and tracking signal-to-interference-plus-noise (SINR) of secondary user (SU) and interference to primary user (PU) generated from the whole secondary user (SUs) is proposed based on the automatic control framework to guarantee the quality of service (QoS) both primary user (PU) and SU in underlay cognitive radio communication network, which considers the constraint of the average interference temperature. On the above foundation, a delay state-space model with the constraint of the weighted interference temperature is proposed under the time delay, multiple access interference (MAI), channel fading, measurement errors, and uncertain noise. Moreover, the robust mixed \(\text {H}_{2} / \text {H}_{\infty }\) power tracking algorithm (RPCA) with adaptive step is proposed to obtain a robust optimal SU’s SINR tracking error under the minimization the worst-case and the minimum interference to PU tracking error, which can compensate the effects of the above factors. In comparison with the conventional power control algorithm (CPCA), the proposed mixed \(\text {H}_{2} / \text {H}_{\infty }\) RPCA can ensure the communication quality of SUs and reduce the interference to PU from the all SUs.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Force FSPT (2002). Report of the spectrum efficiency working group. https://www.fcc.gov/sptf/files/SEWGFinalReport_1.pdf.
Mitola, J., & Maguire, G. Q. (1999). Cognitive radio: Making software radios more personal. IEEE Personal Communications, 6(4), 13–18. https://doi.org/10.1109/98.788210.
Haykin, S. (2005). Cognitive radio: Brain-empowered wireless communications. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 23(2), 201–220. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSAC.2004.839380.
Mokari, N., Parsaeefard, S., Azmi, P., Saeedi, H., & Hossain, E. (2016). Robust ergodic uplink resource allocation in underlay ofdma cognitive radio networks. IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing, 15(2), 419–431. https://doi.org/10.1109/TMC.2015.2413782.
Ozcan, G., & Gursoy, M. C. (2015). Optimal power control for underlay cognitive radio systems with arbitrary input distributions. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 14(8), 4219–4233. https://doi.org/10.1109/TWC.2015.2418208.
Le, L. B., & Hossain, E. (2008). Resource allocation for spectrum underlay in cognitive radio networks. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 7(12), 5306–5315. https://doi.org/10.1109/T-WC.2008.070890.
Sim, M. L., Gunawan, E., Soh, C. B., Soong, B. H. (1998). Study on the characteristics of predictive closed-loop power control algorithms for a cellular ds/cdma system. In: ICUPC ’98. IEEE 1998 International Conference on Universal Personal Communications. Conference Proceedings (Cat. No.98TH8384), vol 2, pp 981–985 vol.2, https://doi.org/10.1109/ICUPC.1998.733653.
Hsuan-Jung, Su., & Geraniotis, E. (2002). Adaptive closed-loop power control with quantized feedback and loop filtering. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 1(1), 76–86. https://doi.org/10.1109/7693.975447.
Rintamaki, M., Koivo, H., & Hartimo, I. (2004). Adaptive closed-loop power control algorithms for cdma cellular communication systems. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 53(6), 1756–1768. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVT.2004.836937.
Yang, G., Li, B., Tan, X., & Wang, X. (2015). Adaptive power control algorithm in cognitive radio based on game theory. IET Communications, 9(15), 1807–1811.
Lee, B., Chen, Y., & Chen, B. (2006). Robust \(\text{ h}_infty\)power control for cdma cellular communication systems. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 54(10), 3947–3956. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSP.2006.880237.
Junhui, Z., Tao, Y., Yi, G., Jiao, W., & Lei, F. (2013). Power control algorithm of cognitive radio based on non-cooperative game theory. China Communications, 10(11), 143–154.
Chen, L., & Zhao, X. (2016). An improved power control afsa for minimum interference to primary users in cognitive radio networks. Wireless Personal Communications, 87(1), 293–311.
Kuo, Y., Yang, J., & Chen, J. (2013). Efficient swarm intelligent algorithm for power control game in cognitive radio networks. Iet Communications, 7(11), 1089–1098.
Gong, S., Wang, P., & Duan, L. (2015). Distributed power control with robust protection for pus in cognitive radio networks. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 14(6), 3247–3258. https://doi.org/10.1109/TWC.2015.2403357.
Yang, L., Sagduyu, Y. E., Zhang, J., Li, J. H. (2011). Distributed power control for ad-hoc communications via stochastic nonconvex utility optimization. In: 2011 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC), IEEE, pp 1–5.
Xu, Y., & Zhao, X. (2015). Distributed power control for multiuser cognitive radio networks with quality of service and interference temperature constraints. Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing, 15(14), 1773–1783.
Chen, L., Li, Q., Zhao, X., Fang, Z., Peng, F., & Wang, J. (2019). Multi-population coevolutionary dynamic multi-objective particle swarm optimization algorithm for power control based on improved crowding distance archive management in crns. Computer Communications, 145, 146–160.
de Sousa, Chaves F., Abbas-Turki, M., Abou-Kandil, H., & Romano, J. M. T. (2013). Transmission power control for opportunistic qos provision in wireless networks. IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, 21(2), 315–331. https://doi.org/10.1109/TCST.2011.2181080.
De Oliveira, M. C., Geromel, J. C., & Bernussou, J. (2002). Extended h 2 and h norm characterizations and controller parametrizations for discrete-time systems. International Journal of Control, 75(9), 666–679.
Sun, C., Alemseged, Y. D., Tran, H. N., & Harada, H. (2010). Transmit power control for cognitive radio over a rayleigh fading channel. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 59(4), 1847–1857. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVT.2009.2037913.
Setoodeh, P., & Haykin, S. (2009). Robust transmit power control for cognitive radio. Proceedings of the IEEE, 97(5), 915–939. https://doi.org/10.1109/JPROC.2009.2015718.
Acknowledgements
This work is supported in part by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under grant no. 61571209 and 61501059, Science and Technology Department of Jilin Provincial, China (Grant No. 20180101336JC) scientific research fund of Jilin Provincial Education Department, China (Grant No. 2016134), outstanding youth fund of Jilin City Science and Technology Bureau, China (Grant No. 20166019), scientific research project of Jilin Institute of Chemical Technology, China (Grant No. 2015128(D)), and major scientific research project of Jilin Institute of Chemical Technology, China (Grant No. 2015010).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendix A
Appendix A
1.1 Channel Model
The above \(g_{i i}(k)\), \(g_{j i}(k)\), \(g_{l i}(k)\) are time-varying power transmission gains in wireless communication channel, which are collectively called \(g_{l i}(k)\). It is composed of long-term fading \(g_{l f}(k)\) and short-term fading \(g_{s f}(k)\)[14] . Thus we have
The short-term fading \(g_{s f}(k)\) is fast power fluctuations caused by the motion of PUs and SUs, and follow the Rayleigh distribution.
The long-term fading \(g_{l f}(k)\) includes an associated with distance-dependent path loss and a shadow fading caused by barriers of the transmission link, it can be expressed as
where \(g_{0}\) represents the path loss at the reference distance and is a constant. D is the distance of transmitter and receiver. \(\alpha\) is path loss factor. The shadow fading S(k) is and has logarithmic normal distribution characteristics in signal level. It can be seen as a first order autorgressive model [AR(1)]–filtered gaussian white noise. The models of the shadow fading S(k) and corresponding autocorrelation function \(R_{s}(k)\) are given as
where \(\beta\) denotes autocorrelation coefficient between receiver and transmitter at distance \(D_{e}\) , v(k) is velocity of the mobile terminal at time slot k, \(T_{s}\) is the sampling period, \(n(k-1)\) is a white Gaussian process of the zero mean value at time slot \(k-1\) and variance
at time slot k. The \(\sigma _{s}(k)\) represents standard deviation of the shadow fading at time slot in the actual communication environment.
Short-term fading is caused by channel fading fast power fluctuations and follow the Rayleigh distribution, short-term fading by famous Jack model simulation in this paper.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Chen, L., Chen, Y., Li, Q. et al. Robust Mixed \(\text {H}_{2} / \text {H}_{\infty }\) Power Control Algorithm for Cognitive Radio Networks. Wireless Pers Commun 123, 135–163 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-021-09123-6
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-021-09123-6