Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Routing Protocol for Low Power and Lossy Network Using Energy Efficient Priority Based Routing

  • Published:
Wireless Personal Communications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Internet of Thing (IoT) collects huge amount of data from the surrounding by monitoring and sensing. Further, transferring these data from IoT devices to cloud environment seems is very challenging. Such that, this paper concentrates on energy consumption, in which the energy efficient routing and priority dependent techniques are proposed. This technique depends upon the RPL network (Routing Protocol for Low power and Lossy), which efficiently predicts routing over contents. Every network slot utilizes timing pattern while forwarding image data, audio data. The proposed method enhances the strength of routing protocol and also avoids congestion. The outcomes of the study illustrates that proposed Energy efficient priority based routing (EEPR) technique minimize overheads on mesh, energy consumption and end-end delay. Also, the proposed method outperforms the existing QRPL methods in IoT platform.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Witkowski, K. (2017). Internet of things, big data, industry 4.0–innovative solutions in logistics and supply chains management. Procedia Engineering, 182, 763–769.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Kotb, Y., Al Ridhawi, I., Aloqaily, M., Baker, T., Jararweh, Y., & Tawfik, H. (2019). Cloud-based multi-agent cooperation for IoT devices using workflow-nets. Journal of Grid Computing, 17, 625–650.

  3. Al Ridhawi, I., Kotb, Y., Aloqaily, M., Jararweh, Y., & Baker, T. (2019). A profitable and energy-efficient cooperative fog solution for IoT services. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, 16, 3578–3586.

  4. Souri, A., Hussien, A., Hoseyninezhad, M., & Norouzi, M. (2019). A systematic review of IoT communication strategies for an efficient smart environment. Transactions on Emerging Telecommunications Technologies, p. e3736

  5. Kharrufa, H., Al-Kashoash, H. A., & Kemp, A. H. (2019). RPL-based routing protocols in IoT applications: A Review. IEEE Sensors Journal, 19, 5952–5967.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Zikria, Y. B., Afzal, M. K., Ishmanov, F., Kim, S. W., & Yu, H. (2018). A survey on routing protocols supported by the Contiki Internet of things operating system. Future Generation Computer Systems, 82, 200–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Salameh, H. B., Otoum, S., Aloqaily, M., Derbas, R., Al Ridhawi, I., & Jararweh, Y. (2020). Intelligent jamming-aware routing in multi-hop IoT-based opportunistic cognitive radio networks. Ad Hoc Networks, 98, 102035.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Aloqaily, M., Al Ridhawi, I., Salameh, H. B., & Jararweh, Y. (2019). Data and service management in densely crowded environments: Challenges, opportunities, and recent developments. IEEE Communications Magazine, 57, 81–87

  9. Al Ridhawi, I., Aloqaily, M., & Boukerche, A.(2019). Comparing fog solutions for energy efficiency in wireless networks: Challenges and opportunities. IEEE Wireless Communications, 26, 80–86

  10. Balasubramanian, V., Otoum, S., Aloqaily, M., Al Ridhawi, I., & Jararweh, Y. (2020). Low-latency vehicular edge: A vehicular infrastructure model for 5G. Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory, 98, 101968.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Souri, A., & Norouzi, M. (2019). A state-of-the-art survey on formal verification of the internet of things applications. Journal of Service Science Research, 11, 47–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Tomić, I., & McCann, J. A. (2017). A survey of potential security issues in existing wireless sensor network protocols. IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 4, 1910–1923.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Vaiyapuri, T., Parvathy, V. S., Manikandan, V., Krishnaraj, N., Gupta, D., & Shankar, K. (2021). A novel hybrid optimization for cluster‐based routing protocol in information-centric wireless sensor networks for IoT based mobile edge computing. Wireless Personal Communications, pp. 1–24

  14. Yahiaoui, S., Omar, M., Bouabdallah, A., Natalizio, E., & Challal, Y. (2018). An energy efficient and QoS aware routing protocol for wireless sensor and actuator networks. AEU-International Journal of Electronics and Communications, 83, 193–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Raoof, A., Matrawy, A., & Lung, C.-H. (2018). Routing attacks and mitigation methods for RPL-based Internet of Things. IEEE Communications Surveys and Tutorials, 21, 1582–1606.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Souri, A., Navimipour, N. J., & Rahmani, A. M. (2018). Formal verification approaches and standards in the cloud computing: A comprehensive and systematic review. Computer Standards and Interfaces, 58, 1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Kumar, M., Azad, M., & Agrawal, N. (2019). Comparative analysis of tree-based data aggregation protocols to maximize lifetime of wireless sensor networks. Pervasive computing: A networking perspective and future directions (pp. 153–163). Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  18. Ambigavathi, M., & Sridharan, D. (2018). Energy-aware data aggregation techniques in wireless sensor network. Advances in power systems and energy management (pp. 165–173). Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  19. Gilbert, E. P. K., Kaliaperumal, B., Rajsingh, E. B., & Lydia, M. (2018). Trust based data prediction, aggregation and reconstruction using compressed sensing for clustered wireless sensor networks. Computers and Electrical Engineering, 72, 894–909.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Petrovic, D., Shah, R. C., Ramchandran, K., & Rabaey, J. (2003). Data funneling: Routing with aggregation and compression for wireless sensor networks. Proceedings of the First IEEE International Workshop on Sensor Network Protocols and Applications, 2003, 156–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Mazumdar, N., Nag, A., & Nandi, S. (2021). HDDS: Hierarchical Data Dissemination Strategy for energy optimization in dynamic wireless sensor network under harsh environments. Ad Hoc Networks, 111, 102348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Wang, S., Yu, J., Atiquzzaman, M., Chen, H., & Ni, L. (2018). CRPD: A novel clustering routing protocol for dynamic wireless sensor networks. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 22, 545–559.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Han, Z., Li, Y., & Li, J. (2018). A novel routing algorithm for IoT cloud based on hash offset tree. Future Generation Computer Systems, 86, 456–463.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Baker, T., Al-Dawsari, B., Tawfik, H., Reid, D., & Ngoko, Y. (2015). GreeDi: An energy efficient routing algorithm for big data on cloud. Ad Hoc Networks, 35, 83–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Yan, S., & Chung, Y. (2020). Improved ad hoc on-demand distance vector routing (AODV) protocol based on blockchain node detection in ad hoc networks. International Journal of Internet, Broadcasting and Communication, 12, 46–55.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Jin, Y., Raza, U., Aijaz, A., Sooriyabandara, M., & Gormus, S. (2017). Content centric cross-layer scheduling for industrial IoT applications using 6TiSCH. IEEE Access, 6, 234–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Dhumane, A. V., & Prasad, R. S. (2019). Multi-objective fractional gravitational search algorithm for energy efficient routing in IoT. Wireless networks, 25, 399–413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Preeth, S. S. L., Dhanalakshmi, R., Kumar, R., & Shakeel, P. M. (2018). An adaptive fuzzy rule based energy efficient clustering and immune-inspired routing protocol for WSN-assisted IoT system. Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing, 624, 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Wang, Y., & Wang, Z. (2019). Routing algorithm of energy efficient wireless sensor network based on partial energy level. Cluster computing, 22, 8629–8638.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Yuan, P., Wang, Y., Su, M., Yang, Z., & Zhang, Q. (2019). Markov decision process-based routing algorithm in hybrid Satellites/UAVs disruption-tolerant sensing networks. IET Communications, 13, 1415–1424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Gara, F., Saad, L. B., Ayed, R. B., & Tourancheau, B. (2019). A new scheme for RPL to handle mobility in wireless sensor networks. International Journal of Ad Hoc and Ubiquitous Computing, 30, 173–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Mohamed, B., & Mohamed, F. (2015). QoS routing RPL for low power and lossy networks. International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks, 11, 971545.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This research work was not funded by any organization/institute/agency.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Bharathiar University, Coimbatore, India

    Saumya Raj

  2. CHRIST (Deemed To Be University), Bangalore, India

    R. Rajesh

Authors
  1. Saumya Raj
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. R. Rajesh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

I Am Saumya Raj Hereby State That The Manuscript Title Entitled “Routing Protocol for Low Power and Lossy Network using Energy Efficient Priority Based Routing” Submitted To Wireless Personal Communications, I and my Co-author R. Rajesh Confirm That This Work Is Original And Has Not Been Published Elsewhere, Nor Is It Currently Under Consideration For Publication Elsewhere. And I Am Research Scholar in Bharathiar University, Coimbatore, India.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Saumya Raj.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

I confirm that this work is original and has either not been published elsewhere, or is currently under consideration for publication elsewhere.

Competing Interests

None of the authors have any competing interests in the manuscript.

Availability of Data and Material

Not applicable.

Code Availability

Not applicable.

Consent to Participate

I confirm that any participants (or their guardians if unable to give informed consent, or next of kin, if deceased) who may be identifiable through the manuscript (such as a case report), have been given an opportunity to review the final manuscript and have provided written consent to publish.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Raj, S., Rajesh, R. Routing Protocol for Low Power and Lossy Network Using Energy Efficient Priority Based Routing. Wireless Pers Commun 123, 1379–1394 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-021-09185-6

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-021-09185-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation