Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

An Efficient AlexNet Deep Learning Architecture for Automatic Diagnosis of Cardio-Vascular Diseases in Healthcare System

  • Published:
Wireless Personal Communications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Fog computing gives various kinds of properties over the internet which allows utilizing different types of services from industries. In these cloud architectures, the key bottleneck is their restricted scalability and therefore incapacity to meet the requirements of centralized computing environments focused on the Internet of Things (IoT). The vital clarification for this is that inertness touchy applications, for example, wellbeing observing and observation frameworks currently need processing over a lot of information (Big Data) moved to concentrated data set and from data set to cloud server farms which prompts drop in execution of such frame works. Fog and edge computing latest paradigms offer revolutionary technologies by taking user services closer and delivering low latency and energy-productive information preparing arrangements contrasted with cloud areas. However the latest fog models have several drawbacks and concentrate on either outcome precision or it may down the time of response but not under narrow perspective. The proposed novel system called ABFog which integrating with edge computing devices in deep learning and it is useful to analyze Heart disease automatically in real-time application. Fog computing is enabled in cloud framework to utilize the Fog Bus which is used to convey the accuracy to present the proposed model. ABFog is useful to provide best quality of service in various configuration modes or to predict accuracy as needed to assort in different situations and for various users prerequisites.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no new data were created or analyzed in this study.

References

  1. Kraemer, F. A., Braten, A. E., Tamkittikhun, N., & Palma, D. (2017). Fog computing in healthcare–a review and discussion. IEEE Access, 5, 9206–9222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Kumari, A., Tanwar, S., Tyagi, S., & Kumar, N. (2018). Fog computing for Healthcare 4.0 environment: Opportunities and challenges. Computers & Electrical Engineering, 72, 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Mutlag, A. A., Abd Ghani, M. K., Arunkumar, N. A., Mohammed, M. A., & Mohd, O. (2019). Enabling technologies for fog computing in healthcare IoT systems. Future Generation Computer Systems, 90, 62–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Jain, R., Gupta, M., Nayyar, A., & Sharma, N. (2020). Adoption of fog computing in healthcare 4.0. In S. Tanwar (Ed.), Fog computing for healthcare 4.0 environments (pp. 3–36). Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Gia, T. N., Jiang, M., Rahmani, A. M., Westerlund, T., Liljeberg, P., & Tenhunen, H. (2015). Fog computing in healthcare internet of things: A case study on ecg feature extraction. In 2015 IEEE International Conference on Computer and information technology; ubiquitous computing and communications; dependable, autonomic and secure computing; pervasive intelligence and computing (pp. 356–363). IEEE.

  6. Sundararaj, V., Muthukumar, S., & Kumar, R. S. (2018). An optimal cluster formation based energy efficient dynamic scheduling hybrid MAC protocol for heavy traffic load in wireless sensor networks. Computers & Security, 77, 277–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Sundararaj, V. (2016). An efficient threshold prediction scheme for wavelet based ECG signal noise reduction using variable step size firefly algorithm. International Journal of Intelligent Engineering and Systems, 9(3), 117–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Sundararaj, V. (2019). Optimised denoising scheme via opposition-based self-adaptive learning PSO algorithm for wavelet-based ECG signal noise reduction. International Journal of Biomedical Engineering and Technology, 31(4), 325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Sundararaj, V., Anoop, V., Dixit, P., Arjaria, A., Chourasia, U., Bhambri, P., Rejeesh, M. R., & Sundararaj, R. (2020). CCGPA-MPPT: Cauchy preferential crossover-based global pollination algorithm for MPPT in photovoltaic system. Progress in Photovoltaics: Research and Applications, 28(11), 1128–1145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Ravikumar, S., & Kavitha, D. (2021). CNN-OHGS: CNN-oppositional-based Henry gas solubility optimization model for autonomous vehicle control system. Journal of Field Robotics, 38, 967.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Ravikumar, S., & Kavitha, D. (2020). IoT based home monitoring system with secure data storage by Keccak-Chaotic sequence in cloud server. Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing, 12, 7475.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Rejeesh, M. R. (2019). Interest point based face recognition using adaptive neuro fuzzy inference system. Multimedia Tools and Applications, 78(16), 22691–22710.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kavitha, D., & Ravikumar, S. (2021). IOT and context-aware learning-based optimal neural network model for real-time health monitoring. Transactions on Emerging Telecommunications Technologies, 32(1), e4132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Hassan, B. A., & Rashid, T. A. (2020). Datasets on statistical analysis and performance evaluation of backtracking search optimisation algorithm compared with its counterpart algorithms. Data in Brief, 28, 105046.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Hassan, B. A. (2020). CSCF: A chaotic sine cosine firefly algorithm for practical application problems. Neural Computing and Applications, 33, 7011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Hassan, B. A., Rashid, T. A., & Mirjalili, S. (2021). Formal context reduction in deriving concept hierarchies from corpora using adaptive evolutionary clustering algorithm star. Complex & Intelligent Systems, 7, 2383.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Haseena, K. S., Anees, S., & Madheswari, N. (2014). Power optimization using EPAR protocol in MANET. International Journal of Innovative Science, Engineering & Technology, 6, 430–436.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Gowthul Alam, M. M., & Baulkani, S. (2019). Local and global characteristics-based kernel hybridization to increase optimal support vector machine performance for stock market prediction. Knowledge and Information Systems, 60(2), 971–1000.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Gowthul Alam, M. M., & Baulkani, S. (2017). Reformulated query-based document retrieval using optimised kernel fuzzy clustering algorithm. International Journal of Business Intelligence and Data Mining, 12(3), 299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Nisha, S., & Madheswari, A. N. (2016). Secured authentication for internet voting in corporate companies to prevent phishing attacks. International Journal of Emerging Technology in Computer Science & Electronics (IJETCSE), 22(1), 45–49.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Gowthul Alam, M. M., & Baulkani, S. (2019). Geometric structure information based multi-objective function to increase fuzzy clustering performance with artificial and real-life data. Soft Computing, 23(4), 1079–1098.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Negash, B., Gia, T. N., Anzanpour, A., Azimi, I., Jiang, M., Westerlund, T., et al. (2018). Leveraging fog computing for healthcare IoT. In A. M. Rahmani & P. Liljeberg (Eds.), Fog computing in the internet of things (pp. 145–169). Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  23. Andriopoulou, F., Dagiuklas, T., & Orphanoudakis, T. (2017). Integrating IoT and fog computing for healthcare service delivery. In G. Keramidas & N. Voros (Eds.), Components and services for IoT platforms (pp. 213–232). Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  24. Shi, Y., Ding, G., Wang, H., Roman, H. E., & Lu, S. (2015, May). The fog computing service for healthcare. In 2015 2nd International Symposium on Future Information and Communication Technologies for Ubiquitous HealthCare (Ubi-HealthTech) (pp. 1–5). IEEE.

  25. Al-Khafajiy, M., Webster, L., Baker, T., & Waraich, A. (2018, June). Towards fog driven IoT healthcare: challenges and framework of fog computing in healthcare. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Future Networks and Distributed Systems (pp. 1–7).

  26. Thota, C., Sundarasekar, R., Manogaran, G., Varatharajan, R., & Priyan, M. K. (2018). Centralized fog computing security platform for IoT and cloud in healthcare system. In C. Thota & R. Sundarasekar (Eds.), Fog computing: Breakthroughs in research and practice (pp. 365–378). IGI global.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  27. Kim, K. I., Ullah, S., Verikoukis, C., & Chao, H. C. (2019). Editorial on “Special issue on fog computing for healthcare.” Peer-to-Peer Networking and Applications, 12(5), 1214–1215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Awaisi, K. S., Hussain, S., Ahmed, M., Khan, A. A., & Ahmed, G. (2020). Leveraging IoT and fog computing in healthcare systems. IEEE Internet of Things Magazine, 3(2), 52–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. da Silva, C. A., & de Aquino Júnior, G. S. (2018). Fog computing in healthcare: a review. In 2018 IEEE Symposium on Computers and Communications (ISCC) (pp. 1126–1131). IEEE.

  30. Stantchev, V., Barnawi, A., Ghulam, S., Schubert, J., & Tamm, G. (2015). Smart items, fog and cloud computing as enablers of servitization in healthcare. Sensors & Transducers, 185(2), 121.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Akrivopoulos, O., Chatzigiannakis, I., Tselios, C., & Antoniou, A. (2017). On the deployment of healthcare applications over fog computing infrastructure. In 2017 IEEE 41st Annual Computer Software and Applications Conference (COMPSAC) (Vol. 2, pp. 288–293). IEEE.

  32. Alazeb, A., & Panda, B. (2019). Ensuring data integrity in fog computing based health-care systems. In International Conference on Security, Privacy and Anonymity in Computation, Communication and Storage (pp. 63–77). Springer.

  33. Hu, P., Dhelim, S., Ning, H., & Qiu, T. (2017). Survey on fog computing: Architecture, key technologies, applications and open issues. Journal of Network and Computer Applications, 98, 27–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. González, L. P., Jaedicke, C., Schubert, J., & Stantchev, V. (2016). Fog computing architectures for healthcare. Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society, 14, 334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. de Moura Costa, H. J., da Costa, C. A., da Rosa Righi, R., & Antunes, R. S. (2020). Fog computing in health: A systematic literature review. Health and Technology, 10, 1025–1044.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Cerina, L., Notargiacomo, S., Paccanit, M. G., & Santambrogio, M. D. (2017). A fog-computing architecture for preventive healthcare and assisted living in smart ambients. In 2017 IEEE 3rd International Forum on Research and Technologies for Society and Industry (RTSI) (pp. 1–6). IEEE.

  37. Dastjerdi, A. V., & Buyya, R. (2016). Fog computing: Helping the Internet of Things realize its potential. Computer, 49(8), 112–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Islam, N., Faheem, Y., Din, I. U., Talha, M., Guizani, M., & Khalil, M. (2019). A blockchain-based fog computing framework for activity recognition as an application to e-Healthcare services. Future Generation Computer Systems, 100, 569–578.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

Not applicable.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of ECE, Sri Sivasubramaniya Nadar College of Engineering, Kalavakkam, Chennai, Tamilnadu, India

    I. Nelson & C. Annadurai

  2. Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Kongu Engineering College, Perundurai, Erode, India

    K. Nirmala Devi

Authors
  1. I. Nelson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. C. Annadurai
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. K. Nirmala Devi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection and analysis were performed by IN, CA, and KND. The first draft of the manuscript was written by CA and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to C. Annadurai.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Research Involving Human and Animal Rights

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nelson, I., Annadurai, C. & Devi, K.N. An Efficient AlexNet Deep Learning Architecture for Automatic Diagnosis of Cardio-Vascular Diseases in Healthcare System. Wireless Pers Commun 126, 493–509 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-022-09755-2

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-022-09755-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation