Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic has created an emergency across the globe. The number of corona positive and death cases is still rising worldwide. All countries’ governments are taking various steps to control the infection of COVID-19. One step to control the coronavirus’s spreading is to quarantine. But the number of active cases at the quarantine center is increasing daily. Also, the doctors, nurses, and paramedical staff providing service to the people at the quarantine center are getting infected. This demands the automatic and regular monitoring of people at the quarantine center. This paper proposed a novel and automated method for monitoring people at the quarantine center in two phases. These are the health data transmission phase and health data analysis phase. The health data transmission phase proposed a geographic-based routing that involves components like Network-in-box, Roadside-unit, and vehicles. An effective route is determined using route value to transmit data from the quarantine center to the observation center. The route value depends on the factors such as density, shortest path, delay, vehicular data carrying delay, and attenuation. The performance metrics considered for this phase are E2E delay, number of network gaps, and packet delivery ratio, and the proposed work performs better than the existing routing like geographic source routing, anchor-based street traffic aware routing, Peripheral node based GEographic DIstance Routing . The analysis of health data is done at the observation center. In the health data analysis phase, the health data is classified into multi-class using a support vector machine. There are four categories of health data: normal, low-risk, medium-risk, and high-risk. The parameters used to measure the performance of this phase are precision, recall, accuracy, and F-1 score. The overall testing accuracy is found to be 96.8%, demonstrating strong potential for our technique to be adopted in practice.



















Similar content being viewed by others
Data Availability
Not Applicable.
References
Qamar, M. A. (2020). Covid-19: A look into the modern age pandemic. Journal of Public Health, 30, 1–4.
Shereen, M. A., Khan, S., Kazmi, A., Bashir, N., & Siddique, R. (2020). Covid-19 infection: Origin, transmission, and characteristics of human coronaviruses. Journal of Advanced Research, 24, 91–98.
Gulati, A., Pomeranz, C., Qamar, Z., Thomas, S., Frisch, D., George, G., Summer, R., DeSimone, J., & Sundaram, B. (2020). A comprehensive review of manifestations of novel coronaviruses in the context of deadly covid-19 global pandemic. The American Journal of the Medical Sciences, 360, 5–34.
Chen, D., Song, F., Tang, L., Zhang, H., Shao, J., Qiu, R., Wang, X., & Ye, Z. (2020). Quarantine experience of close contacts of covid-19 patients in china: A qualitative descriptive study. General Hospital Psychiatry, 66, 81–8.
Hasrouny, H., Samhat, A. E., Bassil, C., & Laouiti, A. (2017). Vanet security challenges and solutions: A survey. Vehicular Communications, 7, 7–20.
Rashid, S. A., Audah, L., Hamdi, M. M., Abood, M. S., & Alani, S. (2020). Reliable and efficient data dissemination scheme in vanet: A review. International Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering (IJECE), 10(6), 6423–6434.
Kumar, V. D., Kumar, V. V., & Kandar, D. (2018). Data transmission between dedicated short range communication and wimax for efficient vehicular communication. Journal of Computational and Theoretical Nanoscience, 15(8), 2649–2654.
Singh, P. K., Nandi, S. K., & Nandi, S. (2019). A tutorial survey on vehicular communication state of the art, and future research directions. Vehicular Communications, 18, 100164.
Campolo, C., Molinaro, A., & Scopigno, R. (2015). From today’s vanets to tomorrow’s planning and the bets for the day after. Vehicular Communications, 2(3), 158–171.
Zeadally, S., Hunt, R., Chen, Y. S., Irwin, A., & Hassan, A. (2012). Vehicular ad hoc networks (vanets): Status, results, and challenges. Telecommunication Systems, 50(4), 217–241.
Rashmi, K., & Patil, R. (2021). Survey on cross layer approach for robust communication in vanet. Wireless Personal Communications, 119(4), 3413–3434.
Kim, J. W., Kim, J. W., & Jeon, D. K. (2018). A cooperative communication protocol for qos provisioning in ieee 802.11 p/wave vehicular networks. Sensors, 18(11), 3622.
Fitah, A., Badri, A., Moughit, M., & Sahel, A. (2018). Performance of dsrc and wifi for intelligent transport systems in vanet. Procedia Computer Science, 127, 360–368.
Tahir, M.N., Maenpaa, K., & Sukuvaara, T. (2019). Evolving wireless vehicular communication system level comparison and analysis of 802, 11 p, 4g 5g. In 2019 2nd International Conference on Communication, Computing and Digital systems (C-CODE). pp. 48–52. IEEE.
Hussain, R., Hussain, F., & Zeadally, S. (2019). Integration of vanet and 5g security: A review of design and implementation issues. Future Generation Computer Systems, 101, 843–864.
Ullah, H., Nair, N. G., Moore, A., Nugent, C., Muschamp, P., & Cuevas, M. (2019). 5g communication: An overview of vehicle-to-everything, drones, and healthcare use-cases. IEEE Access, 7, 37251–37268.
Mahi, M. J. N., Chaki, S., Ahmed, S., Biswas, M., Kaiser, S., Islam, M. S., Sookhak, M., Barros, A., & Whaiduzzaman, M. (2022). A review on vanet research: Perspective of recent emerging technologies. IEEE Access, 10, 65760–65783.
Hussain, R., Rezaeifar, Z., & Oh, H. (2015). A paradigm shift from vehicular ad hoc networks to vanet-based clouds. Wireless Personal Communications, 83(2), 1131–1158.
Blumenthal, D., Fowler, E.J., Abrams, M., & Collins, S.R. (2020). Covid-19-implications for the health care system.
Esbin, M.N., Whitney, O.N., Chong, S., Maurer, A., Darzacq, X., & Tjian, R. (2020). Overcoming the bottleneck to widespread testing: A rapid review of nucleic acid testing approaches for covid-19 detection. RNA pp. rna–076232.
Kojima, N., Turner, F., Slepnev, V., Bacelar, A., Deming, L., Kodeboyina, S., & Klausner, J.D. (2020). Self-collected oral fluid and nasal swabs demonstrate comparable sensitivity to clinician collected nasopharyngeal swabs for covid-19 detection. medRxiv.
Swain, S., Senapati, B.R., & Khilar, P.M. (2023). Evolution of vehicular ad hoc network and flying ad hoc network for real-life applications: Role of vanet and fanet. In Modelling and Simulation of Fast-Moving Ad-Hoc Networks (FANETs and VANETs), pp. 43–73. IGI Global.
Lyu, F., Zhu, H., Zhou, H., Qian, L., Xu, W., Li, M., & Shen, X. (2018). Momac: Mobility-aware and collision-avoidance mac for safety applications in vanets. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 67(11), 10590–10602.
Oliveira, R., Montez, C., Boukerche, A., & Wangham, M. S. (2017). Reliable data dissemination protocol for vanet traffic safety applications. Ad Hoc Networks, 63, 30–44.
Senapati, B. R., Khilar, P. M., & Swain, R. R. (2020). Fire controlling under uncertainty in urban region using smart vehicular ad hoc network. Wireless Personal Communications, 116, 1–21.
Omar, H. A., Lu, N., & Zhuang, W. (2016). Wireless access technologies for vehicular network safety applications. IEEE Network, 30(4), 22–26.
Senapati, B.R., Khilar, P.M., & Sabat, N.K. (2019). An automated toll gate system using vanet. In 2019 IEEE 1st International Conference on Energy, Systems and Information Processing (ICESIP). pp. 1–5. IEEE.
Manojkumar, S., Gokul, M., Nandhakumar, S., Narayanan, K. S., & Aravindh, S. (2018). Automatic toll ticketing for e-transportation. International Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics, 118(20), 1817–1825.
Martuscelli, G., Boukerche, A., Foschini, L., & Bellavista, P. (2016). V2v protocols for traffic congestion discovery along routes of interest in vanets: A quantitative study. Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing, 16(17), 2907–2923.
Jayapal, C., & Roy, S.S. (2016). Road traffic congestion management using vanet. In 2016 International Conference on Advances in Human Machine Interaction (HMI). pp. 1–7. IEEE.
Sumi, L., & Ranga, V. (2018). Intelligent traffic management system for prioritizing emergency vehicles in a smart city. International Journal of Engineering, 31(2), 278–283.
Buchenscheit, A., Schaub, F., Kargl, F., & Weber, M. (2009). A vanet-based emergency vehicle warning system. In 2009 IEEE Vehicular Networking Conference (VNC). pp. 1–8. IEEE.
Senapati, B. R., & Khilar, P. M. (2020). Automatic parking service through vanet: A convenience application. Progress in Computing, Analytics and Networking (pp. 151–159). Berlin: Springer.
Bhoi, S. K., Puthal, D., Khilar, P. M., Rodrigues, J. J., Panda, S. K., & Yang, L. T. (2018). Adaptive routing protocol for urban vehicular networks to support sellers and buyers on wheels. Computer Networks, 142, 168–178.
Lee, U., Lee, J., Park, J. S., & Gerla, M. (2009). Fleanet: A virtual market place on vehicular networks. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 59(1), 344–355.
Zhang, L., Wu, Q., Qin, B., Domingo-Ferrer, J., & Liu, B. (2015). Practical secure and privacy-preserving scheme for value-added applications in vanets. Computer Communications, 71, 50–60.
Zhang, Y., Zhao, J., & Cao, G. (2010). Roadcast: A popularity aware content sharing scheme in vanets. ACM SIGMOBILE Mobile Computing and Communications Review, 13(4), 1–14.
Tufail, A., Fraser, M., Hammad, A., Hyung, K.K., & Yoo, S.W. (2008). An empirical study to analyze the feasibility of wifi for vanets. In 2008 12th international conference on computer supported cooperative work in design. pp. 553–558. IEEE.
Ranjan Senapati, B., Mohan Khilar, P., & Ranjan Swain, R. (2021). Environmental monitoring through vehicular ad hoc network: A productive application for smart cities. International Journal of Communication Systems, 34(18), e4988.
Senapati, B. R., Swain, R. R., & Khilar, P. M. (2020). Environmental monitoring under uncertainty using smart vehicular ad hoc network. Smart intelligent computing and applications (pp. 229–238). Berlin: Springer.
Safi, Q. G. K., Luo, S., Pan, L., Liu, W., & Yan, G. (2018). Secure authentication framework for cloud-based toll payment message dissemination over ubiquitous vanets. Pervasive and Mobile Computing, 48, 43–58.
Senapati, B. R., & Khilar, P. M. (2020). Optimization of performance parameter for vehicular ad-hoc network (vanet) using swarm intelligence. Nature Inspired Computing for Data Science (pp. 83–107). Berlin: Springer.
Swain, R. R., Dash, T., & Khilar, P. M. (2022). Automated fault diagnosis in wireless sensor networks: A comprehensive survey. Wireless Personal Communications, 127, 1–33.
Swain, R. R., Dash, T., & Khilar, P. M. (2020). Lightweight approach to automated fault diagnosis in wsns. IET Networks, 9(3), 110–119.
Swain, R. R., Dash, T., & Khilar, P. M. (2019). A complete diagnosis of faulty sensor modules in a wireless sensor network. Ad Hoc Networks, 93, 101924.
Swain, R. R., Khilar, P. M., & Bhoi, S. K. (2018). Heterogeneous fault diagnosis for wireless sensor networks. Ad Hoc Networks, 69, 15–37.
Senapati, B. R., Swain, R. R., & Khilar, P. M. (2022). Hard and soft fault detection using cloud based vanet. Intelligent and Cloud Computing (pp. 133–143). Berlin: Springer.
Senapati, B. R., Khilar, P. M., & Swain, R. R. (2021). Composite fault diagnosis methodology for urban vehicular ad hoc network. Vehicular Communications, 29, 100337.
Senapati, B. R., Mohapatra, S., & Khilar, P. M. (2019). Fault detection for vanet using vehicular cloud. Intelligent and Cloud Computing (pp. 87–95). Berlin: Springer.
Rao, S.A., Pai, M., Boussedjra, M., & Mouzna, J. (2008). Gpsr-l: Greedy perimeter stateless routing with lifetime for vanets. In 2008 8th International Conference on ITS Telecommunications. pp. 299–304. IEEE.
Liu, L., Wang, Z., & Jehng, W.K. (2008). A geographic source routing protocol for traffic sensing in urban environment. In 2008 IEEE International Conference on Automation Science and Engineering. pp. 347–352. IEEE.
Seet, B.C., Liu, G., Lee, B.S., Foh, C.H., Wong, K.J., & Lee, K.K. (2004). A-star: A mobile ad hoc routing strategy for metropolis vehicular communications. In International conference on research in networking. pp. 989–999. Springer.
Ghafoor, H., Koo, I., & Gohar, N. U. D. (2014). Neighboring and connectivity-aware routing in vanets. The Scientific World Journal. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/789247
Bilal, S.M., Mustafa, S., & Saeed, U. (2011). Impact of directional density on gytar routing protocol for vanets in city environments. In 2011 IEEE 14th International Multitopic Conference. pp. 296–300. IEEE.
Zhao, J., & Cao, G. (2008). Vadd: Vehicle-assisted data delivery in vehicular ad hoc networks. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 57(3), 1910–1922.
Raw, R. S., & Das, S. (2013). Performance analysis of p-gedir protocol for vehicular ad hoc network in urban traffic environments. Wireless Personal Communications, 68(1), 65–78.
Bhoi, S. K., Khilar, P. M., & Singh, M. (2017). A path selection based routing protocol for urban vehicular ad hoc network (uvan) environment. Wireless Networks, 23(2), 311–322.
Altameem, T., & Altameem, A. (2020). Scalable aggregation plan (sap) for portable network in a box (nib) architecture. Peer-to-Peer Networking and Applications, 14, 2295–2305.
Nokia saving lives - intelligent solutions for worldwide rescue operations. https://networks.nokia.com/innovation/nokia-saving-lives (2018), accessed Sep 10, 2020.
Kivits, E., & Van den Hof, P. M. (2018). On representations of linear dynamic networks. IFAC-PapersOnLine, 51(15), 838–843.
Coppins, S. (2018). Putting the network in a box. https://www.attocore.com/blog/putting-the-network-in-a-box/, accessed Sep 11, 2020.
Shailaja, K., Seetharamulu, B., & Jabbar, M. (2018). Machine learning in healthcare: A review. In 2018 Second International Conference on Electronics, Communication and Aerospace Technology (ICECA). pp. 910–914. IEEE.
Zhao, J., Wang, Y., Lu, H., Li, Z., & Ma, X. (2021). Interference-based qos and capacity analysis of vanets for safety applications. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 70(3), 2448–2464.
Hsu, C. H., Manogaran, G., Srivastava, G., & Chilamkurti, N. (2021). Guest editorial: 6g-enabled network in box (nib) for industrial applications and services. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, 17(10), 7141–7144.
Deng, F., Guo, S., Zhou, R., & Chen, J. (2015). Sensor multifault diagnosis with improved support vector machines. IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering, 14(2), 1053–1063.
Bottou, L., Cortes, C., Denker, J.S., Drucker, H., Guyon, I., Jackel, L.D., LeCun, Y., Muller, U.A., Sackinger, E., & Simard, P., et al. (1994). Comparison of classifier methods: a case study in handwritten digit recognition. In Proceedings of the 12th IAPR International Conference on Pattern Recognition, Vol. 3-Conference C: Signal Processing (Cat. No. 94CH3440-5). vol. 2, pp. 77–82. IEEE.
Zhou, J., Yang, Y., Zhang, M., & Xing, H. (2016). Constructing ecoc based on confusion matrix for multiclass learning problems. Science China Information Sciences, 59(1), 1–14.
Wang, T. Y., & Chiang, H. M. (2009). One-against-one fuzzy support vector machine classifier: An approach to text categorization. Expert Systems with Applications, 36(6), 10030–10034.
Eichelberger, R., & Sheng, V. (2013). Does one-against-all or one-against-one improve the performance of multiclass classifications? In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence. vol. 27.
Pedregosa, F., Varoquaux, G., Gramfort, A., Michel, V., Thirion, B., Grisel, O., Blondel, M., Prettenhofer, P., Weiss, R., Dubourg, V., Vanderplas, J., Passos, A., Cournapeau, D., Brucher, M., Perrot, M., & Duchesnay, E. (2011). Scikit-learn: Machine learning in Python. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 12, 2825–2830.
Ray, S., Demirkol, I., & Heinzelman, W. (2013). Supporting bursty traffic in wireless sensor networks through a distributed advertisement-based tdma protocol (atma). Ad Hoc Networks, 11(3), 959–974.
Çalıca Utku, A., Budak, G., Karabay, O., Güçlü, E., Okan, H. D., & Vatan, A. (2020). Main symptoms in patients presenting in the covid-19 period. Scottish Medical Journal, 65(4), 127–132.
Funding
Not Applicable.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Code availability
Not Applicable.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Senapati, B.R., Khilar, P.M., Dash, T. et al. AI-assisted Emergency Healthcare using Vehicular Network and Support Vector Machine. Wireless Pers Commun 130, 1929–1962 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-023-10366-8
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-023-10366-8