Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

AI-assisted Emergency Healthcare using Vehicular Network and Support Vector Machine

  • Published:
Wireless Personal Communications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic has created an emergency across the globe. The number of corona positive and death cases is still rising worldwide. All countries’ governments are taking various steps to control the infection of COVID-19. One step to control the coronavirus’s spreading is to quarantine. But the number of active cases at the quarantine center is increasing daily. Also, the doctors, nurses, and paramedical staff providing service to the people at the quarantine center are getting infected. This demands the automatic and regular monitoring of people at the quarantine center. This paper proposed a novel and automated method for monitoring people at the quarantine center in two phases. These are the health data transmission phase and health data analysis phase. The health data transmission phase proposed a geographic-based routing that involves components like Network-in-box, Roadside-unit, and vehicles. An effective route is determined using route value to transmit data from the quarantine center to the observation center. The route value depends on the factors such as density, shortest path, delay, vehicular data carrying delay, and attenuation. The performance metrics considered for this phase are E2E delay, number of network gaps, and packet delivery ratio, and the proposed work performs better than the existing routing like geographic source routing, anchor-based street traffic aware routing, Peripheral node based GEographic DIstance Routing . The analysis of health data is done at the observation center. In the health data analysis phase, the health data is classified into multi-class using a support vector machine. There are four categories of health data: normal, low-risk, medium-risk, and high-risk. The parameters used to measure the performance of this phase are precision, recall, accuracy, and F-1 score. The overall testing accuracy is found to be 96.8%, demonstrating strong potential for our technique to be adopted in practice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

Not Applicable.

References

  1. Qamar, M. A. (2020). Covid-19: A look into the modern age pandemic. Journal of Public Health, 30, 1–4.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Shereen, M. A., Khan, S., Kazmi, A., Bashir, N., & Siddique, R. (2020). Covid-19 infection: Origin, transmission, and characteristics of human coronaviruses. Journal of Advanced Research, 24, 91–98.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Gulati, A., Pomeranz, C., Qamar, Z., Thomas, S., Frisch, D., George, G., Summer, R., DeSimone, J., & Sundaram, B. (2020). A comprehensive review of manifestations of novel coronaviruses in the context of deadly covid-19 global pandemic. The American Journal of the Medical Sciences, 360, 5–34.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Chen, D., Song, F., Tang, L., Zhang, H., Shao, J., Qiu, R., Wang, X., & Ye, Z. (2020). Quarantine experience of close contacts of covid-19 patients in china: A qualitative descriptive study. General Hospital Psychiatry, 66, 81–8.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hasrouny, H., Samhat, A. E., Bassil, C., & Laouiti, A. (2017). Vanet security challenges and solutions: A survey. Vehicular Communications, 7, 7–20.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Rashid, S. A., Audah, L., Hamdi, M. M., Abood, M. S., & Alani, S. (2020). Reliable and efficient data dissemination scheme in vanet: A review. International Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering (IJECE), 10(6), 6423–6434.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kumar, V. D., Kumar, V. V., & Kandar, D. (2018). Data transmission between dedicated short range communication and wimax for efficient vehicular communication. Journal of Computational and Theoretical Nanoscience, 15(8), 2649–2654.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Singh, P. K., Nandi, S. K., & Nandi, S. (2019). A tutorial survey on vehicular communication state of the art, and future research directions. Vehicular Communications, 18, 100164.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Campolo, C., Molinaro, A., & Scopigno, R. (2015). From today’s vanets to tomorrow’s planning and the bets for the day after. Vehicular Communications, 2(3), 158–171.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Zeadally, S., Hunt, R., Chen, Y. S., Irwin, A., & Hassan, A. (2012). Vehicular ad hoc networks (vanets): Status, results, and challenges. Telecommunication Systems, 50(4), 217–241.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Rashmi, K., & Patil, R. (2021). Survey on cross layer approach for robust communication in vanet. Wireless Personal Communications, 119(4), 3413–3434.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kim, J. W., Kim, J. W., & Jeon, D. K. (2018). A cooperative communication protocol for qos provisioning in ieee 802.11 p/wave vehicular networks. Sensors, 18(11), 3622.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Fitah, A., Badri, A., Moughit, M., & Sahel, A. (2018). Performance of dsrc and wifi for intelligent transport systems in vanet. Procedia Computer Science, 127, 360–368.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Tahir, M.N., Maenpaa, K., & Sukuvaara, T. (2019). Evolving wireless vehicular communication system level comparison and analysis of 802, 11 p, 4g 5g. In 2019 2nd International Conference on Communication, Computing and Digital systems (C-CODE). pp. 48–52. IEEE.

  15. Hussain, R., Hussain, F., & Zeadally, S. (2019). Integration of vanet and 5g security: A review of design and implementation issues. Future Generation Computer Systems, 101, 843–864.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Ullah, H., Nair, N. G., Moore, A., Nugent, C., Muschamp, P., & Cuevas, M. (2019). 5g communication: An overview of vehicle-to-everything, drones, and healthcare use-cases. IEEE Access, 7, 37251–37268.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Mahi, M. J. N., Chaki, S., Ahmed, S., Biswas, M., Kaiser, S., Islam, M. S., Sookhak, M., Barros, A., & Whaiduzzaman, M. (2022). A review on vanet research: Perspective of recent emerging technologies. IEEE Access, 10, 65760–65783.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Hussain, R., Rezaeifar, Z., & Oh, H. (2015). A paradigm shift from vehicular ad hoc networks to vanet-based clouds. Wireless Personal Communications, 83(2), 1131–1158.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Blumenthal, D., Fowler, E.J., Abrams, M., & Collins, S.R. (2020). Covid-19-implications for the health care system.

  20. Esbin, M.N., Whitney, O.N., Chong, S., Maurer, A., Darzacq, X., & Tjian, R. (2020). Overcoming the bottleneck to widespread testing: A rapid review of nucleic acid testing approaches for covid-19 detection. RNA pp. rna–076232.

  21. Kojima, N., Turner, F., Slepnev, V., Bacelar, A., Deming, L., Kodeboyina, S., & Klausner, J.D. (2020). Self-collected oral fluid and nasal swabs demonstrate comparable sensitivity to clinician collected nasopharyngeal swabs for covid-19 detection. medRxiv.

  22. Swain, S., Senapati, B.R., & Khilar, P.M. (2023). Evolution of vehicular ad hoc network and flying ad hoc network for real-life applications: Role of vanet and fanet. In Modelling and Simulation of Fast-Moving Ad-Hoc Networks (FANETs and VANETs), pp. 43–73. IGI Global.

  23. Lyu, F., Zhu, H., Zhou, H., Qian, L., Xu, W., Li, M., & Shen, X. (2018). Momac: Mobility-aware and collision-avoidance mac for safety applications in vanets. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 67(11), 10590–10602.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Oliveira, R., Montez, C., Boukerche, A., & Wangham, M. S. (2017). Reliable data dissemination protocol for vanet traffic safety applications. Ad Hoc Networks, 63, 30–44.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Senapati, B. R., Khilar, P. M., & Swain, R. R. (2020). Fire controlling under uncertainty in urban region using smart vehicular ad hoc network. Wireless Personal Communications, 116, 1–21.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Omar, H. A., Lu, N., & Zhuang, W. (2016). Wireless access technologies for vehicular network safety applications. IEEE Network, 30(4), 22–26.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Senapati, B.R., Khilar, P.M., & Sabat, N.K. (2019). An automated toll gate system using vanet. In 2019 IEEE 1st International Conference on Energy, Systems and Information Processing (ICESIP). pp. 1–5. IEEE.

  28. Manojkumar, S., Gokul, M., Nandhakumar, S., Narayanan, K. S., & Aravindh, S. (2018). Automatic toll ticketing for e-transportation. International Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics, 118(20), 1817–1825.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Martuscelli, G., Boukerche, A., Foschini, L., & Bellavista, P. (2016). V2v protocols for traffic congestion discovery along routes of interest in vanets: A quantitative study. Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing, 16(17), 2907–2923.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Jayapal, C., & Roy, S.S. (2016). Road traffic congestion management using vanet. In 2016 International Conference on Advances in Human Machine Interaction (HMI). pp. 1–7. IEEE.

  31. Sumi, L., & Ranga, V. (2018). Intelligent traffic management system for prioritizing emergency vehicles in a smart city. International Journal of Engineering, 31(2), 278–283.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Buchenscheit, A., Schaub, F., Kargl, F., & Weber, M. (2009). A vanet-based emergency vehicle warning system. In 2009 IEEE Vehicular Networking Conference (VNC). pp. 1–8. IEEE.

  33. Senapati, B. R., & Khilar, P. M. (2020). Automatic parking service through vanet: A convenience application. Progress in Computing, Analytics and Networking (pp. 151–159). Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Bhoi, S. K., Puthal, D., Khilar, P. M., Rodrigues, J. J., Panda, S. K., & Yang, L. T. (2018). Adaptive routing protocol for urban vehicular networks to support sellers and buyers on wheels. Computer Networks, 142, 168–178.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Lee, U., Lee, J., Park, J. S., & Gerla, M. (2009). Fleanet: A virtual market place on vehicular networks. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 59(1), 344–355.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Zhang, L., Wu, Q., Qin, B., Domingo-Ferrer, J., & Liu, B. (2015). Practical secure and privacy-preserving scheme for value-added applications in vanets. Computer Communications, 71, 50–60.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Zhang, Y., Zhao, J., & Cao, G. (2010). Roadcast: A popularity aware content sharing scheme in vanets. ACM SIGMOBILE Mobile Computing and Communications Review, 13(4), 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Tufail, A., Fraser, M., Hammad, A., Hyung, K.K., & Yoo, S.W. (2008). An empirical study to analyze the feasibility of wifi for vanets. In 2008 12th international conference on computer supported cooperative work in design. pp. 553–558. IEEE.

  39. Ranjan Senapati, B., Mohan Khilar, P., & Ranjan Swain, R. (2021). Environmental monitoring through vehicular ad hoc network: A productive application for smart cities. International Journal of Communication Systems, 34(18), e4988.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Senapati, B. R., Swain, R. R., & Khilar, P. M. (2020). Environmental monitoring under uncertainty using smart vehicular ad hoc network. Smart intelligent computing and applications (pp. 229–238). Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Safi, Q. G. K., Luo, S., Pan, L., Liu, W., & Yan, G. (2018). Secure authentication framework for cloud-based toll payment message dissemination over ubiquitous vanets. Pervasive and Mobile Computing, 48, 43–58.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Senapati, B. R., & Khilar, P. M. (2020). Optimization of performance parameter for vehicular ad-hoc network (vanet) using swarm intelligence. Nature Inspired Computing for Data Science (pp. 83–107). Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Swain, R. R., Dash, T., & Khilar, P. M. (2022). Automated fault diagnosis in wireless sensor networks: A comprehensive survey. Wireless Personal Communications, 127, 1–33.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Swain, R. R., Dash, T., & Khilar, P. M. (2020). Lightweight approach to automated fault diagnosis in wsns. IET Networks, 9(3), 110–119.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Swain, R. R., Dash, T., & Khilar, P. M. (2019). A complete diagnosis of faulty sensor modules in a wireless sensor network. Ad Hoc Networks, 93, 101924.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Swain, R. R., Khilar, P. M., & Bhoi, S. K. (2018). Heterogeneous fault diagnosis for wireless sensor networks. Ad Hoc Networks, 69, 15–37.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Senapati, B. R., Swain, R. R., & Khilar, P. M. (2022). Hard and soft fault detection using cloud based vanet. Intelligent and Cloud Computing (pp. 133–143). Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Senapati, B. R., Khilar, P. M., & Swain, R. R. (2021). Composite fault diagnosis methodology for urban vehicular ad hoc network. Vehicular Communications, 29, 100337.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Senapati, B. R., Mohapatra, S., & Khilar, P. M. (2019). Fault detection for vanet using vehicular cloud. Intelligent and Cloud Computing (pp. 87–95). Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Rao, S.A., Pai, M., Boussedjra, M., & Mouzna, J. (2008). Gpsr-l: Greedy perimeter stateless routing with lifetime for vanets. In 2008 8th International Conference on ITS Telecommunications. pp. 299–304. IEEE.

  51. Liu, L., Wang, Z., & Jehng, W.K. (2008). A geographic source routing protocol for traffic sensing in urban environment. In 2008 IEEE International Conference on Automation Science and Engineering. pp. 347–352. IEEE.

  52. Seet, B.C., Liu, G., Lee, B.S., Foh, C.H., Wong, K.J., & Lee, K.K. (2004). A-star: A mobile ad hoc routing strategy for metropolis vehicular communications. In International conference on research in networking. pp. 989–999. Springer.

  53. Ghafoor, H., Koo, I., & Gohar, N. U. D. (2014). Neighboring and connectivity-aware routing in vanets. The Scientific World Journal. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/789247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Bilal, S.M., Mustafa, S., & Saeed, U. (2011). Impact of directional density on gytar routing protocol for vanets in city environments. In 2011 IEEE 14th International Multitopic Conference. pp. 296–300. IEEE.

  55. Zhao, J., & Cao, G. (2008). Vadd: Vehicle-assisted data delivery in vehicular ad hoc networks. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 57(3), 1910–1922.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Raw, R. S., & Das, S. (2013). Performance analysis of p-gedir protocol for vehicular ad hoc network in urban traffic environments. Wireless Personal Communications, 68(1), 65–78.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Bhoi, S. K., Khilar, P. M., & Singh, M. (2017). A path selection based routing protocol for urban vehicular ad hoc network (uvan) environment. Wireless Networks, 23(2), 311–322.

    Google Scholar 

  58. Altameem, T., & Altameem, A. (2020). Scalable aggregation plan (sap) for portable network in a box (nib) architecture. Peer-to-Peer Networking and Applications, 14, 2295–2305.

    Google Scholar 

  59. Nokia saving lives - intelligent solutions for worldwide rescue operations. https://networks.nokia.com/innovation/nokia-saving-lives (2018), accessed Sep 10, 2020.

  60. Kivits, E., & Van den Hof, P. M. (2018). On representations of linear dynamic networks. IFAC-PapersOnLine, 51(15), 838–843.

    Google Scholar 

  61. Coppins, S. (2018). Putting the network in a box. https://www.attocore.com/blog/putting-the-network-in-a-box/, accessed Sep 11, 2020.

  62. Shailaja, K., Seetharamulu, B., & Jabbar, M. (2018). Machine learning in healthcare: A review. In 2018 Second International Conference on Electronics, Communication and Aerospace Technology (ICECA). pp. 910–914. IEEE.

  63. Zhao, J., Wang, Y., Lu, H., Li, Z., & Ma, X. (2021). Interference-based qos and capacity analysis of vanets for safety applications. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 70(3), 2448–2464.

    Google Scholar 

  64. Hsu, C. H., Manogaran, G., Srivastava, G., & Chilamkurti, N. (2021). Guest editorial: 6g-enabled network in box (nib) for industrial applications and services. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, 17(10), 7141–7144.

    Google Scholar 

  65. Deng, F., Guo, S., Zhou, R., & Chen, J. (2015). Sensor multifault diagnosis with improved support vector machines. IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering, 14(2), 1053–1063.

    Google Scholar 

  66. Bottou, L., Cortes, C., Denker, J.S., Drucker, H., Guyon, I., Jackel, L.D., LeCun, Y., Muller, U.A., Sackinger, E., & Simard, P., et al. (1994). Comparison of classifier methods: a case study in handwritten digit recognition. In Proceedings of the 12th IAPR International Conference on Pattern Recognition, Vol. 3-Conference C: Signal Processing (Cat. No. 94CH3440-5). vol. 2, pp. 77–82. IEEE.

  67. Zhou, J., Yang, Y., Zhang, M., & Xing, H. (2016). Constructing ecoc based on confusion matrix for multiclass learning problems. Science China Information Sciences, 59(1), 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  68. Wang, T. Y., & Chiang, H. M. (2009). One-against-one fuzzy support vector machine classifier: An approach to text categorization. Expert Systems with Applications, 36(6), 10030–10034.

    Google Scholar 

  69. Eichelberger, R., & Sheng, V. (2013). Does one-against-all or one-against-one improve the performance of multiclass classifications? In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence. vol. 27.

  70. Pedregosa, F., Varoquaux, G., Gramfort, A., Michel, V., Thirion, B., Grisel, O., Blondel, M., Prettenhofer, P., Weiss, R., Dubourg, V., Vanderplas, J., Passos, A., Cournapeau, D., Brucher, M., Perrot, M., & Duchesnay, E. (2011). Scikit-learn: Machine learning in Python. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 12, 2825–2830.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  71. Ray, S., Demirkol, I., & Heinzelman, W. (2013). Supporting bursty traffic in wireless sensor networks through a distributed advertisement-based tdma protocol (atma). Ad Hoc Networks, 11(3), 959–974.

    Google Scholar 

  72. Çalıca Utku, A., Budak, G., Karabay, O., Güçlü, E., Okan, H. D., & Vatan, A. (2020). Main symptoms in patients presenting in the covid-19 period. Scottish Medical Journal, 65(4), 127–132.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

Not Applicable.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Biswa Ranjan Senapati.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Code availability

Not Applicable.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Senapati, B.R., Khilar, P.M., Dash, T. et al. AI-assisted Emergency Healthcare using Vehicular Network and Support Vector Machine. Wireless Pers Commun 130, 1929–1962 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-023-10366-8

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-023-10366-8

Keywords