Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

The impact of computer self-efficacy, situational interest and academic self-concept in virtual communities of inquiry during the distance learning procedures through Second Life

  • Published:
World Wide Web Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The current study investigates a case where the online learning procedure in three-dimensional (3D) technologically-advanced environments of the Web 2.0 is growing at an exponential rate. In this occasion it is highly imperative need to understand students’ interactions in this innovative mode of e-Education that requires from educators and scholars not only analysis conceptually, but also an empirically-driven optimization. The community of inquiry (CoI) model (or framework) consists to be as one of the most prominent multi-dimensional constructs that it is widely used to represent several distinct dimensions of social presence, teaching presence and cognitive presence, as a unique and fundamental theoretical concept to measure students’ interactions in contemporary electronic environments. Although, the effectiveness of these multi-dimensional constructs creates a dilemma to researchers who want the breadth and comprehensiveness of this model for the precision and clarity of users’ (instructors and students) dimensions with other motivational and learning variables. To address this dilemma, the current empirical study presents statistical analyses from the “trinity” constructs of the CoI model by utilizing correlation and hierarchical regression analyses with two fundamental motivational (computer self-efficacy and situational interest) and another one learning (academic self-concept) variables. This study goes one step further and introduces the conspicuously indisputable intervention of a virtual (V)CoI and its utilization in multi-user virtual worlds, like Second Life (SL). The study findings of one hundred thirty-five (135) participants who enrolled in several online sessions unveiled that the situational interest was the only significant predictor of social presence. The computer self-efficacy was not a significant predictor of the CoI model, while on the other hand academic self-concept was a significant predictor in a revamped attempt to validate the strong relationship among constructs within it. According to the aforementioned reasons, it can be surmised that the successful combination of the VCoI in Second Life, surpassing irrefutable and inherent shortcomings to a future-driven sustainable use and growth.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ackermann, E.: Piaget’s Constructivism, Papert’s constructionism: What’s the Difference? Conference Proceedings Constructivism: Uses and Perspectives in Education, pp. 85–94. Research Center in Education/Cahier, Geneva (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Akyol, Z., Garrison, D.R.: Community of inquiry in adult online learning: collaborative-constructivist approaches. In: Kidd, T., Keengwe, J. (eds.) Adult Learning in the Digital Age: Perspectives on Online Technologies and Outcomes, pp. 52–66. Information Science Reference, Hershey (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Annand, D. Social Presence within the Community of Inquiry Framework. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning (IRRODL), 12(5) (2011) http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/924/1855 Accessed 23 March 2012

  4. Arbaugh, B.: Learning to learn online: a study of perceptual changes between multiple online course experiences. Int. Hig. Educ. 7, 169–182 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bandura, A.: Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A social Cognitive Theory. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1986). p. 391

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bell, D.: Learning from second life. Br. J. Ed. Tech. 40(3), 515–525 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Boulos, M., Hetherington, L., Wheeler, S.: Second life: an overview of the potential of 3-D virtual worlds in medical and health education. Heal. Inform. Libr. J. 24(4), 233–245 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Bates, R., Khasawneh, S.: Self-efficacy and college students’ perceptions and use of online learning systems. Comput. Hum. Behav. 23(1), 175–191 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Bishop, A., Bruce, B., Jones, C.: Communities of inquiry and Information: collaborative learning through ICT. In: Carroll, M. (ed.) Learning in Communities: Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Human Centered Information Technology, pp. 3–5. Springer, Pennsylvania (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Bong, M., Clark, E.: Comparison between self-concept and self-efficacy in academic motivation research. Educ. Psych. 34(3), 139–153 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Bouffard-Bouchard, T.: Influence of self-efficacy on performance in a cognitive task. J. Soc. Psych. 130, 353–363 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Burgess, M., Slate, J., Rojas-LeBouef, A., LaPraire, K.: Teaching and learning in second life: using the community of inquiry (CoI) model to support online instruction with graduate students and instructional technology. Int. Hig. Educ. 13, 84–88 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Craven, G., Marsh, W., Debus, L.: Effects of internally focused feedback and attribution feedback on enhancement of academic self-concept. J. Educ. Psych. 83(1), 17–27 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Chen, A., Darst, W., Pangrazi, P.: What constitutes situational interest? Validating a construct in psychical education. Meas. Psych. Educ. Exerc. Sc. 3(3), 157–180 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Chen, A., Darst, W., Pangrazi, P.: An examination of situational interest and its sources. Br. J. Educ. Psych. 71(3), 383–400 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Chen, A., Ennis, C.: Motivational and achievement in psychical education. In: Wetntzel, K. (ed.) Wingfield, A Handbook of Motivation at School, pp. 553–574. Taylor & Francis, Abington (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Conole, G., Culner, J.: The design of cloud-works: applying social networks practice to foster the exchange of learning and teaching ideas and designs. Com. Educ. 54(3), 679–692 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Compeau, R., Higgins, A.: Computer self-efficacy: development of a measure and initial test. MIS Quart. 19(189–211), 192 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Cordova, I., Lepper, R.: Intrinsic motivation and the process of learning: beneficial effects of contextualization, personalization, and choice. J. Educ. Psych. 88, 715–730 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Di Blas, N., Garzotto, F. & Poggi, C. (2009). Web Engineering at the Frontier of the Web 2.0: Design Patterns for Online 3D Shared Spaces, World Wide Web J., 12(2), 345-379 (2012).

  21. Duncan, I., Miller, A., Jiang, S.: A taxonomy of virtual worlds usage in education. Br. J. Educ. Tech 43(6), 946–964 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Dunn, R., Szapkiw, A., Holder, D. & Hodgson, D.: Of student teachers and avatars: Working towards an effective model for geographically distributed learning communities of pre-service educators using virtual worlds. In D. Gibson & B. Dodge (Eds.), Proceedings of society for information technology & teacher education international conference (pp. 423–427). Chesapeake, VA: AACE (2010)

  23. Eachus, P., Cassidy, S.: Development of the Web Users Self-Efficacy Scale (WUSE). Is. Inf. Sc. Inf. Techn. 3, 199–209 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Fallon, G.: Using avatars and virtual environments to learning: what do they have to offer? Br. J. Ed. Tech. 41(1), 108–122 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Garrison, R., Anderson, T., Archer, W.: Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: computer conferencing in higher education. Int. Hig. Ed. 2(2–3), 87–105 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Garrison, R., Anderson, T.: E-leaning in the 21st Century: A framework for Research and Practice. Routledge/Falmer, London (2003)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  27. Garrison, R., Cleveland-Innes, M., Fung, T.: Exploring causal relationships among cognitive, social and teaching presence: student perceptions of the community of inquiry framework. Int. Hig. Ed. 13(1–2), 31–36 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Garrison, R., Arbaugh, B.: Researching the community of inquiry framework: review, issues, and future directions. Int. Hig. Ed. 10(3), 157–172 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Gorsky, P., Caspi, A., Blau, I.: A comparison of non-mandatory online dialogic behavior in two higher education blended environments. J. As. Lear. Net. 16(4), 55–69 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Guay, F., March, H., Bann, M.: Academic self-concept and academic achievement: developing perception on their causal ordering. J. Ed. Psyc. 95(1), 124–136 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Heilman, M., Collins-Thomson, K., Callan, J., Eskenazi, M., Juffs, A., Wilson, L.: Personalization of reading passages improves vocabulary acquisition. Pers. Artif. Intel. Ed. 20(1)), 73–98 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Hidi, S., Anderson, V.: Situational interest and its impact on reading and expository writing. In: Renninger, K.A., Hidi, S., Krapp, A. (eds.) The role of Interest in Learning and Development, pp. 215–238. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Isanejad, O., Shojaheidari, M., Raji, F., Naderi, M., Roodbari, O.: Formulation of structural model for predicts academic progress via global self- esteem, academic self- concept and self- adjustment learning. J. Am. Sc. 8(7), 547–552 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Johnson, L., Levine, A., Smith, R., Stone, S.: The 2010 Horizon Report. The New Media Consortium, Austin (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Junco, R.: The relationship between frequency of facebook use, participation on Facebook activities and student engagement. Com. Ed. 58(11), 362–371 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Joo, Y., Yon Kim, K., Kyung Kim, E.: Online university students’ satisfaction and persistence: examining perceived level of presence, usefulness and ease of use as predictors in a structural model. Com. Ed. 57, 1654–1664 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Kanuka, H.: An exploration into facilitating higher levels of learning in a text-based Internet learning environment using diverse instructional strategies. J. of Com.-Med. Com., 10(3) http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol10/issue3 (2005) Accessed 15 October 2012

  38. Kaplan, M., Haenlein, M.: Users of the world, unite! the challenges and opportunities of social media. Bus. Horiz. 53, 59–68 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Krapp, A.: Structural and dynamic aspects of interest development: theoretical considerations from an ontogenetic perspective. Lear. Inst. 12, 383–409 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Krause, R., Serlin, C., Ward, E., Rony, Z., Ezenwa, O., Naab, F.: Testing mediation in nursing research: beyond Baron and Kenny. Nur. Res. J. 59, 288–294 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Linnenbrich-Garcia, C., Durik, A., Conley, A., Barron, K., Tauer, J., Karabenick, S. & Harackiewicz, J.: Measuring situational interest in academic domain. Educ. and Psych. Meas., 1-25 (2010)

  42. Kuo, C., Walker, A. & Schroder, K.: Interaction and Other Variables as Predictors of Student Satisfaction in Online Learning Environments. In: D. Gibson & B. Dodge (Eds.), Proceedings of Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 593-600). Chesapeake, VA: AACE (2010)

  43. Lave, J., Wenger, E.: Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1991)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  44. Liu, H.-J.: The relation of academic self-concept to motivation among university EFL students. Feng Chia J. Hum. Soc. Sc. 20, 207–225 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  45. Lee, M.: How can 3D virtual worlds are used to support collaboration learning? An analysis of cases from literature. J. E-lear. know. Soc. 5(1), 149–158 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  46. Lowenthal, A. & Lowenthal, R.: Revisiting teaching presence: An analysis of teaching presence across discourse communities. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Education Research Association, San Diego, and CA. http://patricklowenthal.com/publications/aera2009.pdf. (2009) Accessed 22 May 2012

  47. Madhavan, P., Phillips, R.: Effects of computer self-efficacy and system reliability on user interaction with decision support systems. Comp. Hum. Beh. 26(2), 199–204 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Magner, U., Schwonke, R., Aleven, V., Popescu, O., Renkl, O.: Triggering situational interest by decorative illustrations both fosters and hinders learning in computer-based learning environments. Learn. Instr. (2012). doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2012.07.002

    Google Scholar 

  49. Mc Kerlich, R., Anderson, T.: Community of inquiry and learning in immersive virtual environments. J. As. Lear. Net. 11(4), 35–52 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  50. McKerlich, R., Riis, M., Anderson, T., Eastman, B.: Student perceptions of teaching presence, social presence, and cognitive presence in a virtual world. MERLOT-J. On. Learn. Teach. 7(3), 324–336 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  51. Mitchell, M.: Situational interest: Its multifaceted structure in the secondary school mathematics classroom. J. Educ. Psych. 85, 424–436 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Muller, D., Lee, K., Sharman, M.: Coherence interest: which is the most important in online multimedia learning? Austr. J. Educ. Tech. 24(2), 211–221 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  53. Musial, K., Budka, M., Juszcyszzyn, K.: Creation and growth of online social network. World Wide Web J. (2012). doi:10.1007/s11280-012-012-0177-1. Online first

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  54. Niemivirta, M., Tapola, A.: Self-efficacy interest and task performance with task changes mutual relationships and predictive effects. Zeis. Ped. Psych. 21(3/4), 241–250 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  55. Palloff, R., Pratt, K.: Building Learning Communities in Cyberspace: Effective Strategies for the Online Classroom. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  56. Pellas, N.: Towards a beneficial formalization of cyber entities’ interactions during the e-learning process in the virtual world of “second life”. In: Renna, P. (ed.) Production and Manufacturing System Management: Coordination approaches and Multi-Site Planning, pp. 242–277. Engineering Science Reference, Hershey (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  57. Pellas, N., Peroutseas, E., Kazanidis, I.: Virtual communities of inquiry (VCoI) for learning basic algorithmic structures with Open Simulator & Scratch4(OS): A case study from the Secondary Education in Greece. In: Diamantaras, K., Evangelidis, G., Manolopoulos, Y., Georgiadis, C., Kefalas, P., Stamatis, D. (eds.) Balkan Conference in Informatics, BCI '13, pp. 187–194. ACM Press, Thessaloniki (2013)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  58. Popescu, E.: Providing collaborative learning support with social media in an integrated environment. World Wide Web J. (2012). doi:10.1007/s11280-012-012-0177-1

    Google Scholar 

  59. Renninger, K.A., Hidi, S.: Student interest and achievement: developmental issues rose by a case study. In: Wigfield, A., Eccles, J.S. (eds.) Development of Achievement Motivation, pp. 173–195. Academic, New York (2002)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  60. Preckel, F., Brull, M.: The benefits of being a big fish in a big pond: contrast and assimilation effects on academic self-concept. Lear. Ind. Dif. 20(5), 522–531 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Reid, M., Levy, Y.: Integrating trust and computer self-efficacy with TAM: an empirical assessment of customers’ acceptance of banking information systems (BIS) in Jamaica. J. Inter. Bank. Com. 12(3), 1–18 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  62. Rodriguez, R.: The impact of academic self-concept expectation and the choice self-learning strategy on academic achievement of business students. J. Hig. Educ.l Res. Dev 28(5), 523–529 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Ryan, R., Deci, E.: Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation: classic definition and new directions. Cont. Educ. Psych. 25, 54–67 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Schraw, G., Bruning, R., Svoboda, C.: Sources of situational interest. J. Read. Beh 27, 1–17 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  65. Schraw, G., Floweday, T., Lehman, S.: Situational interest: a review of the literature and directions for future research. Ed. Psych. Rev. 13, 211–224 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Shea, P.: A study of students’ sense of community in online learning environments. J. As. Lear. Net. 10(1), 35–44 (2006)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  67. Shea, P., Bidjerano, T.: Cognitive presence and online learner engagement: a cluster analysis of the community of inquiry framework. J. of Comp. in Hig.Ed 29, 199–217 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Shea, P., Vickers, J., Hayes, S.: Online instructional effort measured through the lens of teaching presence in the community of inquiry framework: a re-examination of measures and approach. The Inter. Rev. Res. Op. Dist. Lear. 11(3), 127–154 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  69. Swan, K., Garrison, D.R., Richardson, J.: A constructivist approach to online learning: the community of inquiry framework. In: Payne, C.R. (ed.) Information Technology and constructivism in Higher Education: Progressive learning Frameworks, pp. 43–57. IGI Global, Hershey (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  70. Traphagan, T., Chiang, Y., Chang, M., Wattanawaha, B., Lee, H., Mayrath, M., Woo, J., Yoon, H., Jee, M., Resta, P.: Cognitive, social and teaching presence in a virtual world and a text chat. Com. Ed. 55, 923–936 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. Trautwein, U., Ludtke, O., Nagy, G., Marsh, W.: Within-school social comparisons: how students perceive the standing of their class predicts academic self-concept. J. Educ. Psych. 101(4), 853–866 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. Vekiri, I., Chronaki, A.: Gender issues in technology use: perceived social support, computer self-efficacy and value beliefs, and computer use beyond school. Comp. Educ. 51, 1392–1404 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. Wang, M., Burton, S.: Second life in education: a review of publications from its launch to 2011. Br. J. Educ. Tech (2012). doi:10.1111/j.1467-8535.2012.01334.x

    Google Scholar 

  74. Warburton, S.: Second Life in higher education: assessing the potential for and the barriers to deploying virtual worlds in learning and teaching. Br. J. Ed. Tech. 40(3), 414–426 (2009)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  75. Yan, B., Yates, A.: Ranch analysis of the academic self-concept questionnaire. Inter. Ed. J. 8(2), 470–484 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  76. York, S., Richardson, C.: Interpersonal interaction in online learning: experienced online instructors’ perceptions of influencing factors. J. Asyn. Lear. Net. 16(4), 81–96 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  77. You, G., Park, J., Hwang, S., Nie, Z., Wen, J.: SocialSearch+: enriching social network with web evidences. World Wide Web J (2012). doi:10.1007/s11280-012-0165-5. online first

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Product and Systems, Design Engineering, University of the Aegean, Konstantinoupoleos 2, Hermoupolis, Cyclades, Syros, 84100, Greece

    Nikolaos Pellas

  2. Kavala Institute of Technology, Ag. Loukas, Kavala, 65404, Greece

    Ioannis Kazanidis

Authors
  1. Nikolaos Pellas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ioannis Kazanidis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ioannis Kazanidis.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pellas, N., Kazanidis, I. The impact of computer self-efficacy, situational interest and academic self-concept in virtual communities of inquiry during the distance learning procedures through Second Life. World Wide Web 17, 695–722 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11280-013-0266-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11280-013-0266-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation