Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Key factors for achieving project success in integration of automotive mechatronics

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Innovations in Systems and Software Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, we present a multiple case study on integration of automotive mechatronic components. Based on the findings, we identify that the root causes of problems in integration are largely related to decisions omitted in electronic strategy. We present and recommend use of checklists defining key factors to address in order to achieve successful integration projects in terms of cost and quality. Our recommendations are defined by checklists for critical decisions in areas: functionality, platform, integration, and stakeholder involvement. The recommendations are established based on practitioner experience and then validated in a multiple case study. Five cases of integration are studied for different heavy vehicles in one company, and the fulfillment of our recommendations is measured. Finally we define project success criteria and we compare the level of fulfillment with the project success in terms of time plan and resource consumption. The main contribution of this study is the validated recommendations, each including a set of checkpoints that defines recommendation fulfillment. We also present defining characteristics to identify a high-risk project. We provide a set of observable project properties and show how they affect project risk.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Åkerholm M, Carlson J, Fredriksson J, Hansson H, Håkansson J, Möller A, Pettersson P, Tivoli M (2006) The save approach to component-based development of vehicular systems. J Syst Softw Available online 26 September 2006 (in press)

  2. Åkerholm M, Carlson J, Fredriksson J, Hansson H, Nolin M, Nolte T, Håkansson J, Pettersson P (2006) Handling subsystems using the savecomp component technology. In: Workshop on models and analysis for automotive systems (WMAAS’06) in conjunction with the 27th IEEE real-time systems symposium (RTSS’06)

  3. Auer G (2004) Automotive news europe, mercedes will make cars less complicated, technology leader cuts 600 electronic functions, seeks more.http://www.accessmylibrary.com/coms2/summary_0286-21549689_ITM (last accessed: 17 October 2006)

  4. AUTOSAR (2006) Homepage of automotive open system architecture (autosar). https://www.decos.at/ (last accessed: 17 January 2006)

  5. Axelsson J (2006) Cost models with explicit uncertainties for electronic architecture trade-off and risk analysis. In: Proceedings of the international council on systems engineering (INCOSE) 2006

  6. Casparsson L, Rajnak A, Tindell K, Malmberg P (1998) Volcano - a revolution in on-board communication. Technical Report. Volvo Technology Report

  7. DECOS (2006) Dependable embedded components and systems. https://www.decos.at/ (last accessed: 17 January 2006)

  8. Eklund U, Askerdahl, Granholm, Axelsson J (2005) Experience of introducing reference architectures in the development of automotive electronic systems. In: Proceedings of 2nd international ICSE workshop on software engineering for automotive systems (SEAS 05)

  9. Electronic Industries Alliance (EIA) (2002) Eia/is-731.1, systems engineering capability model, electronic industries alliance (interim standard)

  10. FlexRay Consortium (2006) Flexray homepage. http://www.flexray.com/

  11. International Standards Organisation (ISO) (1993) ISO 11898 road vehicles—interchange of digital information—controller area network (CAN) for high-speed communication

  12. International Standards Organisation (ISO) (2000) ISO 11898-4 road vehicles—controller area network (CAN)—Part 4: Time-triggered communication

  13. Kazman R, Klein M, Barbacci M, Longstaff T, Lipson H, Carriere J (1998) The architecture tradeoff analysis method. In: Proceedings of the 4th IEEE international conference engineering of complex computer systems (ICECCS ’98), IEEE

  14. Leen G, Heffernan D (2002) Expanding automotive electronic systems. IEEE Comput 35(1):88–93

    Google Scholar 

  15. Nellore R, Balachandra R (2001) Factors influencing success in integrated product development (IPD) projects. IEEE Trans Eng Manage 48

  16. Nellore R, Söderquist K, Eriksson KÅ (1999) A specification model for product development. Eur Manage J 17:50–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Nierstrass O, Arevalo G, Ducasse S, Wuyts R, Black A, Mnller P, Zeidler C, Genssler T, van den Born R (2002) A component model for field devices. In: Proceedings of the 1st International IFIP/ACM working conference on component deployment

  18. Nolte T, Bello LL, Hansson H (2006) Facilitating subsystem integration by decoupling priority and identifier in can messages. In: Proceedings of the 5th international workshop on real-time networks (RTN’06) in conjunction with the 18th Euromicro International Conference on real-time Systems (ECRTS’06)

  19. Nolte T, Nolin M, Hansson H (2006) Real-time server-based communication for CAN. pp 353–372

  20. van Ommering R, van der Linden F, Kramer J (2000) The koala component model for consumer electronics software. IEEE Comput 33(3):78–85

    Google Scholar 

  21. OSEK/VDX (2006) Osek/vdx operating system. http://www.osekvdx.org/mirror/os222.pdf

  22. Saaty TL (1994) How to make a decision. Anal Hierarchy Process, Interface 24:19–43

    Google Scholar 

  23. Siemens VDO (2006) Siemens vdo website. Http://usa.siemensvdo.com/press/factsheet/ (last accessed: 17 October 2006)

  24. The Society of Automotive Engineers (SAE) (2004) Truck and bus control and communications subcommittee, sae j1939 standards collection

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Volvo Construction Equipment, Eskilstuna, Sweden

    Joakim Fröberg

  2. Mälardalen University, Västeras, Sweden

    Mikael Åkerholm, Kristian Sandström & Christer Norström

Authors
  1. Joakim Fröberg
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Mikael Åkerholm
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Kristian Sandström
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Christer Norström
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joakim Fröberg.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fröberg, J., Åkerholm, M., Sandström, K. et al. Key factors for achieving project success in integration of automotive mechatronics. Innovations Syst Softw Eng 3, 141–155 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11334-007-0023-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11334-007-0023-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation