Skip to main content
Log in

Unsupervised Learning Based Evaluation of Player Performances

  • S.I. : ARIIS
  • Published:
Innovations in Systems and Software Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the following paper, we design a model that uses real-time data to segregate players into categories according to their performances in the T-20 tournaments. The data are gathered from reliable websites, cleaned and analysed through cluster space maps based upon certain proposed formula. A thorough research on players’ statistics with different unsupervised clustering algorithms in machine learning and deep learning models is documented and compared through silhouette scores. They are classified based on their strength according to bowlers, batsmen and all-rounders. A comparative study of machine learning algorithms with its deep learning counterparts using auto-encoder is also shown. The paper depicts how the models perform on the given dataset and concludes with the most effective model.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Wickramasinghe IP (2014) Predicting the performance of batsmen in test cricket. J Hum Sport Exercise 9:744–751

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Perera H, Davis J, Swartz TB (2016) Optimal lineups in Twenty20 cricket. J Stat Comput Simul 86:2888–900

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Davis J, Perera H, Swartz TB (2015) Player evaluation in Twenty20 cricket. J Sports Anal 1:19–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Sankaran S (2014) Comparing pay versus performance of IPL bowlers: an application of cluster analysis. Int J Perform Anal Sport 14(1):174–187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Khan JR, Biswas RK, Kabir E (2019) A quantitative approach to influential factors in One Day International cricket: analysis based on Bangladesh. J Sports Anal 5:57–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Cohen GL (2002) Cricketing chances. Abstracts from the 6th Australian conference on mathematics and computers in Sport, 1–3 July 2002, pp 1–14

  7. Patil AJ, Patil CS, Karhe RR, Aher MA (2014) Comparative study of different clustering algorithms. Int J Adv Res Electr Electron Instrum Eng 3:10490–10497

    Google Scholar 

  8. Irvine S, Kennedy R (2017) Analysis of performance indicators that most significantly affect International Twenty20 cricket. Int J Perform Anal Sport 17(3):350–359

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Douglas MJ, Tam N (2010) Analysis of team performances at the ICC World Twenty20 Cup 2009. Int J Perform Anal Sport 10(1):47–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Moore A, Turner JD, Johnstone AJ (2012) A preliminary analysis of team performance in English first-class Twenty-Twenty (T20) cricket. Int J Perform Anal Sport 12:1:188–207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Petersen C, Pyne DB, Portus MJ, Dawson B (2008) Analysis of Twenty/20 Cricket performance during the 2008 Indian Premier League. Int J Perform Anal Sport 8(3):63–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Daniyal M, Nawaz T, Aleem IMM (2012) Analysis of batting performance in cricket using individual and moving range (MR) control charts. Int J Sports Sci Eng 6(4):195–202

    Google Scholar 

  13. Lemmer H (2008) Measures of batting performance in a short series of cricket matches. South Afr Stat J 42(1):65–87

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Amin GR, Sharma SK (2014) Cricket team selection using data envelopment analysis. Eur J Sport Sci 14(sup1):S369–S376

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Jayanth SB, Anthony A, Abhilasha G, Shaik N, Srinivasa G (2018) A team recommendation system and outcome prediction for the game of cricket. J Sports Anal 4:263–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Barr GDI, Kantor BS (2004) A criterion for comparing and selecting batsmen in limited overs cricket. J Oper Res Soc 55:1266–1274

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Forrest D, Dorsey R (2008) Effect of toss and weather on County Cricket Championship outcomes. J Sports Sci 26:3–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Dawson P, Morley B, Paton D, Thomas D (2009) To bat or not to bat: an examination of match outcomes in day-night limited overs cricket. J Oper Res Soc 60:1786–1793

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Mitra S, Patra T, Ghosh R, Ghosh S, Bose A (2019) Framework for appraisal of twenty-twenty league players. In: Global AI congress

  20. Saikia H, Bhattacharjee D, Lemmer HH (2012) Predicting the performance of bowlers in IPL: an application of artificial neural network. Int J Perform Anal Sport 12:75–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Prakash CD, Patvardhan C, Singh S (2016) A new machine learning based deep performance index for ranking IPL T20 Cricketers. Int J Comput Appl 137:42–49

    Google Scholar 

  22. Jain SS, Gupta R, Tiwari C, Kaur N (2019) Behaviour of players on IPL based on fuzzy C means. Int J Innov Technol Explor Eng (IJITEE) 8(9):150–154

    Google Scholar 

  23. Lee H, Park KH, Bien ZZ (2008) Iterative fuzzy clustering algorithm with supervision to construct probabilistic fuzzy rule base from numerical data. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 16(1):263–277

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Wang Y, Yao H, Zhao S (2015) Auto-encoder based dimensionality reduction, neurocomputing. Elsevier, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  25. Bruno G, Cerquitelli T, Chiusano S, Xiao X (2014) A clustering-based approach to analyse examinations for diabetic patients. In: IEEE international conference on healthcare informatics

  26. Spearman C (1904) General intelligence objectively determined and measured. Am J Psychol 15:206–221

    Google Scholar 

  27. Torgerson WS (1952) Multidimensional scaling I: theory and method. Psychometrika 17:401–419

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  28. Jain AK (2010) Data clustering: 50 years beyond K-means. Pattern Recognit Lett 31:651–666

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Tan CC, Eswaran C (2008) Performance comparison of three types of autoencoder neural networks. In: Second Asia international conference on modelling & simulation

  30. Pearson K (1901) On lines and planes of closest fit to systems of points in space. Philios Mag 2:559–572

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Shah P (2017) New performance measure in Cricket. ISOR J Sports Phys Educ 4:28–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Kanhaiya K, Gupta R, Sharma AK (2019) Cracked cricket pitch analysis (CCPA) using image processing and machine learning. Global J Appl Data Sci Internet Things 3:1

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sannoy Mitra.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bose, A., Mitra, S., Ghosh, S. et al. Unsupervised Learning Based Evaluation of Player Performances. Innovations Syst Softw Eng 17, 121–130 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11334-020-00374-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11334-020-00374-3

Keywords

Navigation