Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Extractive single-document summarization using adaptive binary constrained multi-objective differential evaluation

  • S.I. : Low Resource Machine Learning Algorithms (LR-MLA)
  • Published:
Innovations in Systems and Software Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The incredible growth of the Internet has enhanced the research and development of automatic text summarization. Several approaches were proposed in the literature for automatic text summarization using a Multi-objective optimization (MOO) framework. But, still, it is difficult to decide which feature set and objective functions are best suited for the summarization task. Improving these objective functions along with the suitable optimization framework can bring diversity among the solutions and convergence towards genuine Pareto optimal fronts. So, it can be fascinating to prospect other proficient techniques that can further improve the performance of the automatic summarization process. This work proposes an adaptive binary constrained differential evolution (ABCDE) technique in the MOO framework for solving the summarization problem. The implemented system significantly outperformed various existing methods on ROUGE measures when evaluated on DUC 2001 and DUC 2002 data sets. Obtained results illustrate the supremacy of the proposed approach in terms of ROUGE scores, readability, and relevancy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

Notes

  1. http://duc.nist.gov/.

References

  1. Radev DR, Hovy E, McKeown K (2002) Introduction to the special issue on summarization. Comput Linguist 28(4):399–408

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Maybury M (1999) Advances in automatic text summarization. MIT Press, Cambridge

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Alguliev RM, Aliguliyev RM (2005) Effective summarization method of text documents. In: The 2005 IEEE/WIC/ACM international conference on web intelligence (WI’05). IEEE, pp 264–271

  4. Abbasi-ghalehtaki R, Khotanlou H, Esmaeilpour M (2016) Fuzzy evolutionary cellular learning automata model for text summarization. Swarm Evol Comput 30:11–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Song W, Choi LC, Park SC, Ding XF (2011) Fuzzy evolutionary optimization modeling and its applications to unsupervised categorization and extractive summarization. Expert Syst Appl 38(8):9112–9121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Vázquez E, Arnulfo Garcia-Hernandez R, Ledeneva Y (2018) Sentence features relevance for extractive text summarization using genetic algorithms. J Intell Fuzzy Syst 35(1):353–365

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Debnath D, Das R, Pakray P (2020) Extractive single document summarization using an archive-based micro genetic-2. In: 2020 7th international conference on soft computing and machine intelligence (ISCMI). IEEE, pp 244–248

  8. Alguliyev RM, Aliguliyev RM, Isazade NR, Abdi A, Idris N (2019) Cosum: text summarization based on clustering and optimization. Expert Syst 36(1):e12340

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Saini N, Saha S, Jangra A, Bhattacharyya P (2019) Extractive single document summarization using multi-objective optimization: exploring self-organized differential evolution, grey wolf optimizer and water cycle algorithm. Knowl Based Syst 164:45–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Storn R, Price K (1996) Minimizing the real functions of the icec’96 contest by differential evolution. In: Proceedings of IEEE international conference on evolutionary computation. IEEE, pp 842–844

  11. Suresh K, Kundu D, Ghosh S, Das S, Abraham A (2009) Data clustering using multi-objective differential evolution algorithms. Fund Inform 97(4):381–403

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Das S, Abraham A, Konar A (2007) Automatic clustering using an improved differential evolution algorithm. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Part A Syst Hum 38(1):218–237

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Zhang D, Wei B (2014) Comparison between differential evolution and particle swarm optimization algorithms. In: 2014 IEEE international conference on mechatronics and automation. IEEE, pp 239–244

  14. Deb K, Pratap A, Agarwal S, Meyarivan T (2002) A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: Nsga-ii. IEEE Trans Evol Comput 6(2):182–197

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Binwahlan MS, Salim N, Suanmali L (2009) Swarm based text summarization. In: 2009 international association of computer science and information technology-spring conference. IEEE, pp 145–150

  16. Mirjalili S, Mirjalili SM, Lewis A (2014) Grey wolf optimizer. Adv Eng Softw 69:46–61

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Eskandar H, Sadollah A, Bahreininejad A, Hamdi M (2012) Water cycle algorithm-a novel metaheuristic optimization method for solving constrained engineering optimization problems. Comput. Struct. 110:151–166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Saini N, Saha S, Chakraborty D, Bhattacharyya P (2019) Extractive single document summarization using binary differential evolution: optimization of different sentence quality measures. PLoS ONE 14(11):e0223477

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Tiwari S, Fadel G, Deb K (2011) Amga2: improving the performance of the archive-based micro-genetic algorithm for multi-objective optimization. Eng Optim 43(4):377–401

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Prasad R, Kulkarni U, Prasad J (2009) Machine learning in evolving connectionist text summarizer. Anti-counterfeiting Sec Identif Commun 2009:539–543

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Luhn HP (1958) The automatic creation of literature abstracts. IBM J Res Dev 2(2):159–165

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Baxendale PB (1958) Machine-made index for technical literature—an experiment. IBM J Res Dev 2(4):354–361

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. Edmundson HP (1969) New methods in automatic extracting. J ACM 16(2):264–285

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. Baralis E, Cagliero L, Fiori A, Garza P (2015) Mwi-sum: a multilingual summarizer based on frequent weighted itemsets. ACM Trans Inf Syst 34(1):1–35

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. Sutskever I, Vinyals O, Le QV, Sequence to sequence learning with neural networks, arXiv preprint arXiv:1409.3215

  26. Cho K, Van Merriënboer B, Gulcehre C, Bahdanau D, Bougares F, Schwenk H, Bengio Y, Learning phrase representations using rnn encoder-decoder for statistical machine translation, arXiv preprint arXiv:1406.1078

  27. Debnath D, Das R, Rafi S (2022) Sentiment-based abstractive text summarization using attention oriented lstm model. In: Intelligent data engineering and analytics. Springer, pp 199–208

  28. James C, Mirella L (2010) Discourse constraints for document compression. Assoc Comput Linguist 36(3):411–441

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  29. Daumé III H, Marcu D (2002) A noisy-channel model for document compression. In: Proceedings of the 40th annual meeting of the association for computational linguistics (ACL), Philadelphia, July 2002. Association for Computational Linguistics, pp 449–456

  30. Vinyals O, Le Q, A neural conversational model, arXiv preprint arXiv:1506.05869

  31. Wan X (2010) Towards a unified approach to simultaneous single-document and multi-document summarizations. In: Proceedings of the 23rd international conference on computational linguistics (Coling 2010), pp 1137–1145

  32. Mendoza M, Cobos C, León E (2015) Extractive single-document summarization based on global-best harmony search and a greedy local optimizer. In: Mexican international conference on artificial intelligence. Springer, pp 52–66

  33. Mendoza M, Bonilla S, Noguera C, Cobos C, León E (2014) Extractive single-document summarization based on genetic operators and guided local search. Expert Syst Appl 41(9):4158–4169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Aliguliyev RM (2009) A new sentence similarity measure and sentence based extractive technique for automatic text summarization. Expert Syst Appl 36(4):7764–7772

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  35. Verma P, Verma A, Pal S (2022) An approach for extractive text summarization using fuzzy evolutionary and clustering algorithms. Appl Soft Comput 120:108670

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  36. Mojrian M, Mirroshandel SA (2021) A novel extractive multi-document text summarization system using quantum-inspired genetic algorithm: Mtsqiga. Expert Syst Appl 171:114555

  37. Ehrgott M (2005) Multicriteria optimization, vol 491. Springer, Berlin

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  38. Chica M, Bautista J, de Armas J (2019) Benefits of robust multiobjective optimization for flexible automotive assembly line balancing. Flex Serv Manuf J 31(1):75–103

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  39. Andoni A, Indyk P, Krauthgamer R (2008) Earth mover distance over high-dimensional spaces. In: SODA, vol 8. Citeseer, pp 343–352

  40. Goldberg Y, Levy O, word2vec explained: deriving mikolov et al.’s negative-sampling word-embedding method, arXiv preprint arXiv:1402.3722

  41. Chin-Yew L (2004) Rouge: a package for automatic evaluation of summaries. In: Text summarization branches out, pp 74–81

  42. Saleh HH, Kadhim NJ, Attea B (2015) A genetic based optimization model for extractive multi-document text summarization. Iraqi J Sci 56(2):1489–1498

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The work presented here falls under Research Project Grant No. IFC/4130/DST- CNRS/2018-19/IT25 supported by DST-CNRS targeted program.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dipanwita Debnath.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest, and no funds, grants, or other support were received.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Debnath, D., Das, R., Pakray, P. et al. Extractive single-document summarization using adaptive binary constrained multi-objective differential evaluation. Innovations Syst Softw Eng 21, 15–27 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11334-022-00474-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11334-022-00474-2

Keywords