Skip to main content
Log in

Localization in ambiguous environments using multiple weak cues

  • Original Research Paper
  • Published:
Intelligent Service Robotics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper presents a probabilistic approach for sensor-based localization with weak sensor data. Wireless received signal strength measurements are used to disambiguate sonar measurements in symmetric environments. Particle filters are used to model the multi-hypothesis estimation problem. Experiments indicate that multiple weak cues can provide robust position estimates and that multiple sensors also aid in solving the kidnapped robot problem.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Blaer P, Allen PK (2003) TopBot: Automated network topology detection with a mobile robot. In: IEEE international conference on robotics and automation, Taipei, Taiwan

  2. Choset H, Pignon P (1997) Coverage path planning: The boustrophedon cellular decomposition. In: International Conference on Field and Service Robotics, Canberra, Australia

  3. Elnahrawy E, Li X, Martin RP (2004) The limits of localization using signal strength: A comparative study. In: IEEE Communications society conference on sensor and Ad Hoc communications and networks, Santa Clara, CA, USA

  4. Fox D, Burgard W, Dellaert F, Thrun S (1999) Monte Carlo localization: Efficient position estimation for mobile robots. In: Proceedings of national conference on artificial intelligence, Orlando, FL, USA

  5. Fox D, Thrun S, Burgard W, Dellaert F (2000) Particle filters for mobile robot localization. In: Sequential Monte Carlo methods in practice, Springer

  6. Hii P, Zaslavsky A (2005) Improving location accuracy by combining wlan positioning and sensor technology. In: Workshop on Real-world wireless sensor networks, Stockholm, Sweden

  7. Isard M, Blake A (1998) CONDENSATION—conditional density propagation for visual tracking. Int J Comput Vis 29(1): 5–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kaemarungsi K, Krishnamurthy P (2004) Properties of indoor received signal strength for wlan location fingerprinting. In: First annual international conference on mobile and ubiquitous systems: networking and services, Boston, MA, USA, pp 14–23

  9. Kontkanen P, Myllymäki P, Roos T, Tirri H, Valtonen K, Wettig H (2004) Topics in probabilistic location estimation in wireless networks. In: Proceedings of 15th IEEE International Symposium on Personal, Indoor, and Mobile Radio Communications, Barcelona, Spain

  10. Ladd AM, Bekris KE, Rudys AP, Wallach DS, Kavraki LE (2004) On the feasibility of using wireless ethernet for indoor localization. IEEE Trans Rob Autom 20(3):555–559

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Montemerlo M, Thrun S, Koller D, Wegbreit B (2002) FastSLAM: A factored solution to the simultaneous localization and mapping problem. In: Proceedings of the AAAI National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Edmonton, Canada

  12. Thrun S, Burgard W, Fox D (2005) Probabilistic Robotics. MIT Press, Cambridge

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Janne Laaksonen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Laaksonen, J., Kyrki, V. Localization in ambiguous environments using multiple weak cues. Intel Serv Robotics 1, 281–288 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11370-008-0023-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11370-008-0023-6

Keywords

Navigation