Skip to main content

Advertisement

Springer Nature Link
Log in

An immunity-based time series prediction approach and its application for network security situation

  • Original Research Paper
  • Published:
Intelligent Service Robotics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To effectively improve the prediction precision of network security situation and prevent the large-scale network security attacks, an immunity-based time series prediction approach for network security situation (ITSPA) is proposed. In ITSPA, the concepts and formal definitions of antigen, antibody and affinity used for predicting network security situation are given; and meanwhile, the mathematical models of antibody evolution operators used for establishing the prediction model of network security situation are shown. For the time series of network security situation, its chaotic characteristics are analyzed and the corresponding sample space is reconstructed by phase space reconstruction method; then, the corresponding prediction model is constructed by artificial immune mechanism; finally, this prediction model is used for predicting the time series of network security situation. To demonstrate the predicting effectiveness of ITSPA, four typical time series (namely real-time network probe situation, real-time network situation, short-term network probe situation and short-term network situation) obtained from DARPA 1999 data set and long-term network security situation time series obtained from HoneyNet Project data set are used for simulating experiments. The experimental results show that ITSPA is an effective prediction approach for the time series of network security situation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

References

  1. Xu JQ, Wang JF, Zhang J, Zhao H (2014) Virus spreading model based on degree correlation and its analysis. Sci China Ser F Inf Sci 66:793–810

  2. Ou CM (2012) Host-based intrusion detection systems adapted from agent-based artificial immune systems. Neurocomputing 88:78–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Chen XZ, Zheng QH, Guan XH, Lin CG (2006) Quantitative hierarchical threat evaluation model for network security. J Softw 17(4):885–897

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Endsley MR (1988) Design and evaluation for situation awareness enhancement. In: Human factors society 32nd annual meeting. Anaheim, vol 1, p 97

  5. Bass T (2000) Intrusion detection systems and multisensor data fusion. Commun ACM 43(4):99–105

  6. Sun FX (2011) Artificial immune danger theory based model for network security evaluation. J Netw 6(2):255–262

    Google Scholar 

  7. Lau S (2004) The spinning cube of potential doom. Commun ACM 47(6):25–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Carnegie Mellon’s SEI (2005) System for Internet Level Knowledge (SILK). http://silktools.sourceforge.net

  9. Li T (2005) An immunity based network security risk estimation. Sci China Ser F Inf Sci 48(5):557–578

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Wei Y, Lian YF (2009) A network security situational awareness model based on log audit and performance correction. Chin J Comput 32(4):763–772

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Lai JB, Wang HQ, Liu XW, Liang Y, Zheng RJ, Zhao GS (2008) WNN-based network security situation quantitative prediction method and its optimization. J Comput Sci Technol 23(2):222–230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Szpiro GG (1997) Forecasting chaotic time series with genetic algorithms. Am Phys Soc 2557–2568:1997

    Google Scholar 

  13. Oliveira KD, Vannucci A, da Silva EC (2000) Using artificial neural networks to forecast chaotic time series. Phys A 284:393–404

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Thissen U (2003) Using support vector machines for time series prediction. Chemom Intell Lab Syst 69:35–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Liu B, Hu DP (1999) Studies on applying artificial neural networks to some forecasting problems. J Syst Eng 14(4):338–344

    Google Scholar 

  16. Miranian A, Abdollahzade M (2013) Developing a local least-squares support vector machines-based neuro-fuzzy model for nonlinear and chaotic time series prediction. IEEE Trans Neural Netw Learn Syst 24(2):207–218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Aydin I, Karakose M, Akin E (2011) A multi-objective artificial immune algorithm for parameter optimization in support vector machine. Appl Soft Comput 11:120–129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Quan TW, Liu XM, Liu Q (2010) Weighted least squares support vector machine local region method for nonlinear time series prediction. Appl Soft Comput 10:562–566

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. De Castro LN, Timmis J (2002) Artificial immune systems: a new computational intelligence approach. Springer, London

    Google Scholar 

  20. Forrest S, Perelson AS, Allen L, Cherukuri R (1994) Self-nonself discrimination in a computer. In: Proceedings of IEEE computer society symposium on research in security and privacy, USA, vol 1, pp 202–212

  21. Timmis J, Hone A, Stibor T, Clark E (2008) Theoretical advances in artificial immune systems. Theor Comput Sci 403:11–32

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  22. Gong MG, Jiao LC, Zhang LN, Du HF (2009) Immune secondary response and clonal selection inspired optimizers. Prog Nat Sci 19:237–253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Haktanirlar Ulutas B, Kulturel-Konak S (2011) A review of clonal selection algorithm and its applications. Artif Intell Rev 36(2):117–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Shang RH, Qi LP, Jiao LC, Stolkin R, Li YY (2014) Change detection in SAR images by artificial immune multi-objective clustering. Eng Appl Artif Intell 31:53–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Khilwani N, Prakash A, Shankar R, Tiwari MK (2008) Fast clonal algorithm. Eng Appl Artif Intell 21:106–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Packard NH, Crutchfietd JP, Farmer JD, Shaw RS (1980) Geometry from a time series. Phys Rev Lett 45(9):712–716

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Takens F (1981) Detecting strange attractors in turbulence. Lect Notes Math 898:361–381

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  28. Kim HS, Eykholt R, Salas JD (1999) Nonlinear dynamics delay times and embedding windows. Phys D 127:48–60

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  29. Yu SQ, Wang HH, Zhu NS, Ye R (2008) Introduction to immunology. Higher Education Press, Beijing

    Google Scholar 

  30. Puntambekar AA (2008) Data structures and algorithms. Technical Publications, Pune

    Google Scholar 

  31. George AJT, Grey D (1999) Receptor editing during affinity maturation. Immunol Today 20(4):196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Rudolph G (1994) Convergence analysis of canonical genetic algorithms. IEEE Trans Neural Netw 5:96–101

  33. Zhang WX, Leung Y (2003) Mathematical foundation of genetic algorithms. Xi’an Jiaotong University Press, Xian

    Google Scholar 

  34. Lippmann RP, Haines JW, Fried DJ, Korba J, Das K (2000) The 1999 DARPA off-line intrusion detection evaluation. Comput Netw 34(4):579–595

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. HoneyNet P (2002) Know your enemy: statistics, USA. http://old.honeynet.org/papers/stats/honeynet_data.tar.gz

  36. Rosenstein MT, Collins JJ, De Luca CJ (1993) A practical method for calculating largest Lyapunov exponents from small data sets. Phys D 65:117–134

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  37. Cichocki A, Unbehauen R (1993) Neural networks for optimization and signal processing. Wiley, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant Nos. 61173036, 61262077, 61462025, the Research Foundation of Education Bureau of Hunan Province of China under Grant No. 12B099, China Postdoctoral Science Foundation under Grant No. 2014M562102, Hunan Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant No. 07JJ6140, and the Constructing Program of the Key Discipline in Huaihua University.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. College of Computer Science and Electronic Engineering, Hunan University, Changsha, 410082, China

    Yuanquan Shi & Renfa Li

  2. College of Computer Engineering, Huaihua University, Huaihua, 418000, China

    Yuanquan Shi & Xiaoning Peng

  3. College of Information Science and Technology, Hainan Normal University, Haikou, 571158, China

    Yu Zhang

Authors
  1. Yuanquan Shi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Renfa Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Yu Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Xiaoning Peng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yuanquan Shi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shi, Y., Li, R., Zhang, Y. et al. An immunity-based time series prediction approach and its application for network security situation. Intel Serv Robotics 8, 1–22 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11370-014-0160-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11370-014-0160-z

Keywords