Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

Anthropomorphic design and control of a polycentric knee exoskeleton for improved lower limb assistance

  • Original Research Paper
  • Published:
Intelligent Service Robotics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Around one billion people (15% of the global population) suffer from impairments such as muscular weakness, partial or complete paralysis, and lack of assistance in their lower extremities. As a result, robotic devices such as the exoskeleton are used to assist paralysed patients with their day-to-day tasks, aid in neuro-rehabilitation, and enhance the mobility of the user, simultaneously. In this paper, the design and control of a lower extremity exoskeleton with a polycentric knee joint, named as EXXON is presented. It is designed in a way such that it can provide assistance to paralytic patients for performing daily tasks and improve their quality of life and to aid faster and better rehabilitation. Based on the degrees of freedom (DOF) and range of motion of the human lower limb joints, the joints of EXXON has been designed. EXXON has a total 10 DOF at both of its limbs: both active hip flexion/extension and adduction/abduction, active knee flexion/extension, active ankle dorsiflexion/plantarflexion and passive inversion/eversion. The knee joint of EXXON is designed to be a polycentric joint so that it can mimic the moving centrode of anatomical knee. For this, a double 4-bar mechanism is designed. The first 4-bar is for tracing the trajectory of the anatomical knee while the second one is for transmitting the torque to the first 4-bar from the knee actuator. A dynamic model of EXXON has been developed for its controlling. A Computed Torque Controller is designed to simulate the dynamic model of EXXON, such that its joints can track the desired gait trajectories. Simulation results with the developed controller are also presented.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21
Fig. 22
Fig. 23
Fig. 24
Fig. 25
Fig. 26
Fig. 27
Fig. 28
Fig. 29
Fig. 30
Fig. 31
Fig. 32
Fig. 33
Fig. 34
Fig. 35
Fig. 36
Fig. 37
Fig. 38
Fig. 39
Fig. 40

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

Data availability

All data are available with the corresponding author.

References

  1. Kalita B, Narayan J, Dwivedy SK (2021) Development of active lower limb robotic-based orthosis and exoskeleton devices: a systematic review. Int J Soc Robot 13:775–793

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Shi D, Zhang W, Zhang W, Ding X (2019) A review on lower limb rehabilitation exoskeleton robots. Chin J Mech Eng 32(1):1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Hasan S, Dhingra AK (2022) Biomechanical design and control of an eight DoF human lower extremity rehabilitation exoskeleton robot. Results Control Optim 7:100107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Umesh K, Vidhyapriya R et al (2021) Finite element analysis of lower limb exoskeleton during sit-to-stand transition. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Eng 24(13):1419–1425

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Hyun DJ, Park H, Ha T, Park S, Jung K (2017) Biomechanical design of an agile, electricity-powered lower-limb exoskeleton for weight-bearing assistance. Robot Auton Syst 95:181–195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Wang S, Wang L, Meijneke C, Van Asseldonk E, Hoellinger T, Cheron G, Ivanenko Y, La Scaleia V, Sylos-Labini F, Molinari M et al (2014) Design and control of the mindwalker exoskeleton. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 23(2):277–286

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Choi H, Park YJ, Seo K, Lee J, Lee S-E, Shim Y (2017) A multifunctional ankle exoskeleton for mobility enhancement of gait-impaired individuals and seniors. IEEE Robot Autom Lett 3(1):411–418

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Lee Y, Lee J, Choi B, Lee M, Roh S-G, Kim K, Seo K, Kim Y-J, Shim Y (2019) Flexible gait enhancing mechatronics system for lower limb assistance (gems l-type). IEEE/ASME Trans Mechatron 24(4):1520–1531

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Narayan J, Kumar Dwivedy S (2021) Preliminary design and development of a low-cost lower-limb exoskeleton system for paediatric rehabilitation. Proc Inst Mech Eng 235(5):530–545

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Banchadit W, Temram A, Sukwan T, Owatchaiyapong P, Suthakorn J (2012) Design and implementation of a new motorized-mechanical exoskeleton based on CGA patternized control. In: 2012 IEEE international conference on robotics and biomimetics (ROBIO), pp 1668–1673. IEEE

  11. Niestanak VD, Moshaii AA, Moghaddam MM (2017) A new underactuated mechanism of hand tendon injury rehabilitation. In: 2017 5th RSI international conference on robotics and mechatronics (ICRoM), pp 400–405. IEEE

  12. AbbasiMoshaii A, Najafi F (2019) Design, evaluation and prototyping of a new robotic mechanism for ultrasound imaging. J Comput Appl Mech 50(1):108–117

    Google Scholar 

  13. Zhou L, Chen W, Chen W, Bai S, Zhang J, Wang J (2020) Design of a passive lower limb exoskeleton for walking assistance with gravity compensation. Mech Mach Theory 150:103840

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Baser O, Kizilhan H, Kilic E (2016) Mechanical design of a biomimetic compliant lower limb exoskeleton (biocomex). In: 2016 International conference on autonomous robot systems and competitions (ICARSC), pp 60–65. IEEE

  15. Gálvez-Zúñiga MA, Aceves-López A et al (2016) A review on compliant joint mechanisms for lower limb exoskeletons. J Robot 2016

  16. Moshaii AA, Masouleh MT, Zarezadeh E, Farajzadeh K (2015) Static analysis of a 3-RRS and a 3-RSR spherical parallel robots. In: 2015 3rd RSI international conference on robotics and mechatronics (ICROM), pp 800–804. IEEE

  17. Wang J, Pang Y, Chang X, Chen W, Zhang J (2019) Mechanical design and optimization on lower limb exoskeleton for rehabilitation. In: 2019 14th IEEE conference on industrial electronics and applications (ICIEA), pp 137–142. IEEE

  18. Bartenbach V, Gort M, Riener R (2016) Concept and design of a modular lower limb exoskeleton. In: 2016 6th IEEE international conference on biomedical robotics and biomechatronics (BioRob), pp 649–654. IEEE

  19. Yeung L-F, Tong RK-Y (2018) Lower limb exoskeleton robot to facilitate the gait of stroke patients. Wearable Technol Med Health Care 91

  20. Dos Santos WM, Nogueira SL, Oliveira GC, Peña GG, Siqueira AA (2017) Design and evaluation of a modular lower limb exoskeleton for rehabilitation. In: 2017 international conference on rehabilitation robotics (ICORR), pp 447–451. IEEE

  21. Mir-Nasiri N (2017) Efficient lower limb exoskeleton for human motion assistance. In: Wearable robotics: challenges and trends: proceedings of the 2nd international symposium on wearable robotics, WeRob2016, October 18–21, 2016, Segovia, Spain, pp 293–297. Springer

  22. Hasan S (2022) Deep learning technology-based exoskeleton robot controller development. arXiv preprint arXiv:2209.12133

  23. Qu Z, Dorsey JF, Zhang X, Dawson DM (1991) Robust control of robots by the computed torque law. Syst Control Lett 16(1):25–32

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  24. Lencioni T, Carpinella I, Rabuffetti M, Marzegan A, Ferrarin M (2019) Human kinematic, kinetic and EMG data during different walking and stair ascending and descending tasks. Sci Data 6(1):309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Roebuck JA Jr (1999) Indian anthropometric dimensions for ergonomic design. Ergon Des 7(2):37–37

    Google Scholar 

  26. Gunston FH (1971) Polycentric knee arthroplasty: prosthetic simulation of normal knee movement. J Bone Jt Surg Br 53(2):272–277

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Piña-Martínez E, Rodriguez-Leal E et al (2015) Inverse modeling of human knee joint based on geometry and vision systems for exoskeleton applications. Math Probl Eng 2015

  28. Bapat GM, Sujatha S A method for optimal synthesis of a biomimetic four-bar linkage knee joint for a kafo

  29. Choo J, Park JH (2017) Increasing payload capacity of wearable robots using linear actuators. IEEE/ASME Trans Mechatron 22(4):1663–1673

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Fleischer C, Kondak K, Wege A, Kossyk I (2009) Research on exoskeletons at the TU Berlin. Advances in robotics research: theory, implementation, application, pp 335–346

  31. Craig JJ (2006) Introduction to robotics. Pearson Education

  32. Drillis R, Contini R, Bluestein M (1964) Body segment parameters. Artif Limbs 8(1):44–66

    Google Scholar 

  33. Liu S, Chen GS (2019) Dynamics and control of robotic manipulators with contact and friction. John Wiley & Sons

  34. Hasan S, Dhingra AK (2022) Development of a sliding mode controller with chattering suppressor for human lower extremity exoskeleton robot. Results Control Optim 7:100123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Pennestrì E, Rossi V, Salvini P, Valentini PP (2016) Review and comparison of dry friction force models. Nonlinear Dyn 83:1785–1801

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Guo Z, Yu H, Yin YH (2014) Developing a mobile lower limb robotic exoskeleton for gait rehabilitation. J Med Devices 8(4):044503

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Mathew SS, Jisha V (2020) Tracking control of a mobile manipulator with external torque disturbances using computed torque control. In: 2020 IEEE 17th India council international conference (INDICON), pp 1–7. IEEE

Download references

Funding

No funding was received to assist with the preparation of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Mechanical Engineering, Tezpur University, Napaam, Tezpur, Assam, 784028, India

    Rwittik Barkataki, Zahnupriya Kalita & Sushen Kirtania

Authors
  1. Rwittik Barkataki
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  2. Zahnupriya Kalita
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  3. Sushen Kirtania
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

All the authors contributed equally to the work.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zahnupriya Kalita.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no competing interests to declare that are relevant to the content of this article.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Barkataki, R., Kalita, Z. & Kirtania, S. Anthropomorphic design and control of a polycentric knee exoskeleton for improved lower limb assistance. Intel Serv Robotics 17, 555–577 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11370-024-00512-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11370-024-00512-x

Keywords