Skip to main content

Advertisement

Springer Nature Link
Log in

Design, simulation, and experimental evaluation of a light weight, and wearable cable driven ForeWrist exoskeleton robot for assistance and rehabilitation

  • Original Research Paper
  • Published:
Intelligent Service Robotics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Injuries and diseases such as wrist nerve injuries, stroke, neurological disorders, and other wrist-related conditions have significantly impacted people’s quality of life. This study aims to develop a lightweight, affordable, and portable ForeWrist (forearm and wrist) exoskeleton. This device is intended to assist and rehabilitate individuals with wrist disabilities, mainly stroke survivors, to enhance wrist range of motion and strength. The device can offer one active degree of freedom (DOF) responsible for pronation-supination (PS) of the forearm and two passive DOFs for the wrist joint. The design of the ForeWrist PS mainly consists of a cable-driven C-shaped guide rail and stationary bearing-carriage mechanism that can be attached to the user’s wrist. The simulation and experimental analysis are conducted for the design validation and performance analysis. The experimental results indicate that the designed device should demonstrate promising potential for practical applications. The root mean squared error for joint position and velocity exhibit low values, and the peak torque for an average weight of the human lower arm was found to be under 10% of the device’s total capacity. The developed exoskeleton provides a full range of motion for daily activities and covers 75% of the forearm’s total range of motion with a consistency error of less than \(1^\circ \). The device can be effective for both at home and outdoor assistance and rehabilitation training with its low weight of 300 g and peak velocity and torque of 70 deg/sec and 6 Nm, respectively.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

Data availability

All data are available with the corresponding author.

References

  1. Snoek GJ, Ijzerman MJ, Hermens HJ, Maxwell D, Biering-Sorensen F (2004) Survey of the needs of patients with spinal cord injury: impact and priority for improvement in hand function in tetraplegics. Spinal cord 42(9):526–532

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Nichols-Larsen DS, Clark PC, Zeringue A, Greenspan A, Blanton S (2005) Factors influencing stroke survivors’ quality of life during subacute recovery. Stroke 36(7):1480–1484. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.0000170706.13595.4f

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Law K et al (2008) Evaluation of deformity and hand function in cerebral palsy patients. J Orthop Surg Res 3(1):1–9. https://doi.org/10.1186/1749-799X-3-52

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. WHO (2020) The top 10 causes of death; Leading causes of death globally. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/the-top-10-causes-of-death. Accessed 20 Apr 2022

  5. Lindsay MP et al (2019) World Stroke Organization (WSO): global stroke fact sheet 2019, pp 806–817

  6. WHO (2019) World stroke organization; statement on stroke care in China. https://www.world-stroke.org/news-and-blog/news/statement-on-stroke-care-in-china-june. Accessed 20 Apr 2022

  7. Angerhöfer C, Colucci A, Vermehren M, Hömberg V, Soekadar SR (2021) Post-stroke rehabilitation of severe upper limb paresis in Germany—toward long-term treatment with brain-computer interfaces. Front Neurol 12:2166. https://doi.org/10.3389/FNEUR.2021.772199/BIBTEX

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Maciejasz P, Eschweiler J, Gerlach-Hahn K, Jansen-Troy A, Leonhardt S (2014) A survey on robotic devices for upper limb rehabilitation. J Neuroeng Rehabil 11(3):841–849. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00115-003-1549-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Lee J, Tech V, Tech V (2018) Design of a wearable 3-DOF forearm exoskeleton for rehabilitation and assistive purposes. In: Proceedings ASME 2017 international mechanical engineering congress and exposition IMECE2017, pp 1–10

  10. Stewart AM et al (2017) Review of upper limb hybrid exoskeletons. IFAC-PapersOnLine, vol 50, no 1, pp 15169–15178, [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2017.08.2266

  11. Abbasimoshaii A, Najafi F (2019) Design, prototyping and evaluation of a new robotic mechanism for ultrasound imaging. J Comput Appl Mech 50(1):108–117. https://doi.org/10.22059/jcamech.2018.257439.282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Mayetin U, Kucuk S (2022) Design and experimental evaluation of a low cost, portable, 3-DOF wrist rehabilitation robot with high physical human–robot interaction. J Intell Robot Syst 106(3):65. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10846-022-01762-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Niestanak VD, Moshaii AA, Moghaddam MM (2017) A new underactuated mechanism of hand tendon injury rehabilitation In: 5th RSI international conference on robotics and mechatronics, IcRoM 2017, no IcRoM, pp 400–405, https://doi.org/10.1109/ICRoM.2017.8466194

  14. Hussain S, Jamwal PK, Van Vliet P, Ghayesh MH (2020) State-of-the-art robotic devices for wrist rehabilitation: design and control aspects. IEEE Trans Hum Mach Syst 50(5):361–372. https://doi.org/10.1109/THMS.2020.2976905

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Rahman HA, Fai YC, Ming ESL (2014) Analysis of human hand kinematics: forearm pronation and supination. J Med Imaging Heal Inform 4(2):245–249. https://doi.org/10.1166/jmihi.2014.1239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Lambelet C et al (2020) Characterization and wearability evaluation of a fully portable wrist exoskeleton for unsupervised training after stroke. J Neuroeng Rehabil 17(1):1–17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12984-020-00749-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Beekhuis JH, Westerveld AJ, Van Der Kooij H, Stienen AHA (2013) Design of a self-aligning 3-DOF actuated exoskeleton for diagnosis and training of wrist and forearm after stroke. In: IEEE international conference on rehabilitation robotics, pp 3–8, https://doi.org/10.1109/ICORR.2013.6650357

  18. Omarkulov N, Telegenov K, Zeinullin M, Tursynbek I, Shintemirov A (2016) Preliminary mechanical design of NU-Wrist: A 3-DOF self-Aligning Wrist rehabilitation robot. In: Proceedinds IEEE RAS EMBS international conference on biomedical robotics and biomechatronics, vol. 2016-July, no November 2017, pp 962–967, https://doi.org/10.1109/BIOROB.2016.7523753

  19. Gull MA et al (2021) A 4-dof upper limb exoskeleton for physical assistance: design, modeling, control and performance evaluation. Appl Sci 11(13):5865. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11135865

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Fulton PV, Lohlein S, Paredes-Acuna N, Berberich N, Cheng G(2021) Wrist exoskeleton design for pronation and supination using mirrored movement control. In: 2021 20th Int. Conf. Adv. Robot. ICAR 2021, pp 575–580, https://doi.org/10.1109/ICAR53236.2021.9659397.

  21. Shalal NS, Aboud WS (2021) Smart robotic exoskeleton: a 3-dof for wrist-forearm rehabilitation. J Robot Control 2(6):476–483. https://doi.org/10.18196/jrc.26125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Buongiorno D, Sotgiu E, Leonardis D, Marcheschi S, Solazzi M, Frisoli A (2018) WRES: a novel 3 DoF WRist ExoSkeleton with tendon-driven differential transmission for neuro-rehabilitation and teleoperation. IEEE Robot Autom Lett 3(3):2152–2159. https://doi.org/10.1109/LRA.2018.2810943

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Wu Q, Wang X, Chen B, Wu H (2018) Patient-active control of a powered exoskeleton targeting upper limb rehabilitation training. Front Neurol 9:817. https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2018.00817

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Kim B, Deshpande AD (2017) An upper-body rehabilitation exoskeleton Harmony with an anatomical shoulder mechanism: design, modeling, control, and performance evaluation. Int J Rob Res 36(4):414–435. https://doi.org/10.1177/0278364917706743

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Kumar S, Simnofske M, Bongardt B, Müller A, Kirchner F (2017) Integrating mimic joints into dynamics algorithms: Exemplified by the hybrid recupera exoskeleton. In: ACM Int. Conf. Proceeding Ser., vol. Part F1320, https://doi.org/10.1145/3132446.3134891.

  26. Dittli J, Hofmann UAT, Bützer T, Smit G, Lambercy O, Gassert R (2021) Remote actuation systems for fully wearable assistive devices: requirements, selection, and optimization for out-of-the-lab application of a hand exoskeleton. Front Robot AI 7:1–20. https://doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2020.596185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Sanjuan JD et al (2020) Cable driven exoskeleton for upper-limb rehabilitation: a design review. Rob Auton Syst 126:103445. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.robot.2020.103445

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Mohammadi E, Zohoor H, Khadem SM (2016) Design and prototype of an active assistive exoskeletal robot for rehabilitation of elbow and wrist. Sci Iran 23(3):998–1005. https://doi.org/10.24200/sci.2016.3868

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Martinez JA, Ng P, Lu S, Campagna MS, Celik O (2013) Design of wrist gimbal: a forearm and wrist exoskeleton for stroke rehabilitation. IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICORR.2013.6650459

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Kelly SR, Tacy G, Kesner S, Harlan A (2020) Powered orthotic device and method of using same. US010758394B2

  31. Shi K, Song A, Li Y, Li H, Chen D, Zhu L (2021) A cable-driven three-DOF wrist rehabilitation exoskeleton with improved performance. Front Neurorobotics 15:664062. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnbot.2021.664062

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Gopura RARC, Kiguchi K (2007) Development of an exoskeleton robot for human wrist and forearm motion assist. In: ICIIS 2007—2nd international conference on industrial and information systems 2007, Conf. Proc., no August, pp 535–540, https://doi.org/10.1109/ICIINFS.2007.4579235

  33. Dias EAF, de Andrade RM (2020) Design of a cable-driven actuator for pronation and supination of the forearm to integrate an active arm orthosis. p 4, https://doi.org/10.3390/iecat2020-08511

  34. Lu J, Haninger K, Chen W, Gowda S, Tomizuka M, Carmena JM (2016) Design of a passive upper limb exoskeleton for macaque monkeys. J Dyn Syst Meas Control Trans ASME 138(11):1–10. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4033837

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Ambar R, Zakaria MF, Ahmad MS, Muji SZ, Jamil MMA (2017) Development of a home-based wrist rehabilitation system. Int J Electr Comput Eng 7(6):3153–3163. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijece.v7i6.pp3153-3163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. M. H. and A. P. Letier, Pierre A. Schiele, M. Avraam, “Bowden Cable Actuator for Torque-Feedback in Haptic Applications,” Proc. Eurohaptics 2006, no. July, 2006.

  37. Xiloyannis M, Cappello L, Khanh DB, Yen SC, Masia L (2016) Modelling and design of a synergy-based actuator for a tendon-driven soft robotic glove. In: Proceedings IEEE RAS EMBS international conference on biomedical robotics and biomechatronics, vol 2016-July, pp 1213–1219, https://doi.org/10.1109/BIOROB.2016.7523796.

  38. Ayhan E, Ayhan Ç (2020) Kinesiology of the elbow complex. Comp Kinesiol Hum Body Norm Pathol Cond. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-812162-7.00012-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Sardelli M, Tashjian RZ, MacWilliams BA (2011) Functional elbow range of motion for contemporary tasks. J Bone Jt Surg 93(5):471–477. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.I.01633

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Plagenhoef S, Evans FG, Abdelnour T (1983) Anatomical data for analyzing human motion. Res Q Exerc Sport 54(2):169–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Axelsson P, Fredrikson P, Nilsson A, Andersson JK, Kärrholm J (2018) Forearm torque and lifting strength: normative data. J Hand Surg Am. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2017.12.022

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Perry JC, Rosen J, Burns S (2007) Upper-limb powered exoskeleton design. IEEE/ASME Trans Mechatron 12(4):408–417. https://doi.org/10.1109/TMECH.2007.901934

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Wang Z et al (2021) Active loading control design for a wearable exoskeleton with a bowden cable for transmission. Actuators. https://doi.org/10.3390/act10060108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Lu Y, Fan D (2013) Transmission backlash of precise cable drive system. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part C J Mech Eng Sci 227(10):2256–2267. https://doi.org/10.1177/0954406212473887

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Herbin P, Pajor M (2021) Human-robot cooperative control system based on serial elastic actuator bowden cable drive in ExoArm 7-DOF upper extremity exoskeleton. Mech Mach Theory 163:104372. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2021.104372

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Rahman MH, K-Ouimet T, Saad M, Kenné JP, Archambault PS (2011) Control of a powered exoskeleton for elbow, forearm and wrist joint movements. In: 2011 IEEE international conference on robotics and biomimetics, ROBIO 2011, pp 1561–1566, https://doi.org/10.1109/ROBIO.2011.6181511

  47. Junior AL, de Andrade RM, Bento Filho A (2016) Series elastic actuator: design, analysis and comparison. Recent Adv Robot Syst. https://doi.org/10.5772/63573

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Pehlivan AU, Sergi F, Erwin A, Yozbatiran N, Francisco GE, O’Malley MK (2014) Design and validation of the RiceWrist-S exoskeleton for robotic rehabilitation after incomplete spinal cord injury. Robotica 32(8):1415–1431. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0263574714001490

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Pezent E, Rose CG, Deshpande AD, O’Malley MK (2017) Design and characterization of the OpenWrist: A robotic wrist exoskeleton for coordinated hand-wrist rehabilitation. In: IEEE international conference on rehabilitation robotics, pp 720–725, https://doi.org/10.1109/ICORR.2017.8009333

  50. Cappello L, Elangovan N, Contu S, Khosravani S, Konczak J, Masia L (2015) Robot-aided assessment of wrist proprioception. Front hum neurosci 9:198. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2015.00198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Zhang X et al (2023) Design and performance analysis of a bioelectronic controlled hybrid serial-parallel wrist exoskeleton. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 31:2665–2675. https://doi.org/10.1109/TNSRE.2023.3283603

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Garcia-Leal R, Cruz-Ortiz D, Ballesteros M, Huegel JC (2023) Development of the biomech-wrist: A 3-DOF exoskeleton for rehabilitation and training of human wrist. In: IEEE international conference on rehabilitation robotics, pp 1–6, https://doi.org/10.1109/ICORR58425.2023.10304602

  53. Greiner TM (1991) Hand Anthropometry of U.S. Army Personnel Final Report no June 1989, [Online]. Available: https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/citations/ADA244533

Download references

Funding

This research was funded by Nanjing HUAGU Technologies Co. Ltd, China (Grant Number: 8502008413).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Mechanical Engineering, Southeast University, Nanjing, 211189, China

    Danaish, Han Liang, Mohammad Abbas Baig, Yangzhen Gao & GuanCheng Dong

  2. Department of Neurology, First Affiliated Hospital of Shenzhen University, Shenzhen Second People’s Hospital, Shenzhen, 518035, China

    Gelin Xu

  3. Department of Neurology, Academy for The Affiliated Jiangning Hospital with Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, 211100, Jiangsu, China

    Xu Zongliang

Authors
  1. Danaish
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  2. Han Liang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  3. Gelin Xu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  4. Mohammad Abbas Baig
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  5. Yangzhen Gao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  6. GuanCheng Dong
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  7. Xu Zongliang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Danaish was involved in conceptualization, methodology, formal analysis, investigation, writing—original draft, writing—review and editing. Professor Han Laing was involved in methodology, review, and supervision. Professor Gelin Xu and Dr. Xu Zongliang were involved in resources and review. Mohammad Abbas Baig, Yangzhen Gao, and, GuanCheng Dong were involved in data curation, resources, and review.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Han Liang or Gelin Xu.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Consent to participate

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Consent for publication

All authors voluntarily agree to the publication of the paper.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Co-first author: Han Liang.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Danaish, Liang, H., Xu, G. et al. Design, simulation, and experimental evaluation of a light weight, and wearable cable driven ForeWrist exoskeleton robot for assistance and rehabilitation. Intel Serv Robotics 17, 1061–1075 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11370-024-00558-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11370-024-00558-x

Keywords