Skip to main content
Log in

Probabilistic Adaptive Anonymous Authentication in Vehicular Networks

  • Regular Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Computer Science and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Vehicular networks have attracted extensive attention in recent years for their promises in improving safety and enabling other value-added services. Most previous work focuses on designing the media access and physical layer protocols. Privacy issues in vehicular systems have not been well addressed. We argue that privacy is a user-specific concept, and a good privacy protection mechanism should allow users to select the levels of privacy they wish to have. To address this requirement, we propose an adaptive anonymous authentication mechanism that can trade off the anonymity level with computational and communication overheads (resource usage). This mechanism, to our knowledge, is the first effort on adaptive anonymous authentication. The resources used by our protocol are few. A high traffic volume of 2000 vehicles per hour consumes about 60kbps bandwidth, which is less than one percent of the bandwidth of DSRC (Dedicated Short Range Communications). By using adaptive anonymity, the protocol response time can further be improved 2∼4 times with less than 20% bandwidth overheads.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Vehicle infrastructure integration. U.S. Department of Transportation, 2006, http://www.its.dot.gov/vii/docs/vii_factsheet.pdf.

  2. Bishop R. A survey of intelligent vehicle applications worldwide. In Proc. IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium 2000, Dearborn, MI, USA, Oct. 2000, pp.25–30.

  3. National intelligent transportation systems program plan: A ten-year vision. A Report from Intelligent Transportation Society of America and Department of Transportation. ITSA, DoT, 2002, http://www.itsa.org/itsa/files/pdf/National10YearPlanITSFull.pdf.

  4. Mak T, Laberteaux K, Sengupta R. A multi-channel VANET providing concurrent safety and commercial services. In Proc. the 2nd ACM International Workshop on Vehicular Ad Hoc Networks, Cologne, Germany, Sept. 2005, pp.1–9.

  5. Dedicated Short Range Communications (DSRC) home. DSRC, 2006, http://grouper.ieee.org/groups/scc32/dsrc/.

  6. Hubaux J, Capkun S, Luo J. The security and privacy of smart vehicles. IEEE Security and Privacy, 2004, 4(3): 49–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Raya M, Hubaux J. The security of vehicular ad hoc networks. In Proc. the 3rd ACM Workshop on Security of Ad Hoc and Sensor Networks, Alexandria, VA, USA, Nov. 2005, pp.11–21.

  8. Dötzer F. Privacy issues in vehicular ad hoc networks. In Proc. Workshop on Privacy Enhancing Technologies, Dubrovnik, Croatia, May 2005, pp.197–209.

  9. Choi J, Jakobsson M, Wetzel S. Balancing auditability and privacy in vehicular networks. In Proc. the 1st ACM International Workshop on Quality of Service and Security in Wireless and Mobile Networks, Montreal, Canada, Oct. 2005, pp.79–87.

  10. Sampigethaya K et al. CARAVAN: Providing location privacy for VANET. In Proc. Embedded Security in Cars (ESCAR), Cologne, Germany, Nov. 2005.

  11. Sun X, Lin X, Ho P P. Secure vehicular communications based on group signature and id-based signature scheme. In Proc. International Conference on Communications (ICC), Glasgow, Scotland, Jun. 2007, pp.1539–1545.

  12. Lin X, Sun X, Ho P P, Shen X. GSIS: A secure and privacy preserving protocol for vehicular communications. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, Nov. 2007, 56: 3442–3456.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Guo J, Baugh J, Wang S. A group signature based secure and privacy-preserving vehicular communication framework. In Proc. the Mobile Networking for Vehicular Environments (MOVE) Workshop in Conjunction with IEEE INFOCOM, Anchorage, Alaska, USA, May 2007, pp.103–108.

  14. Fonseca E, Festag A, Baldessari R, Aguiar R. Support of anonymity in VANETs — putting pseudonymity into practice. In Proc. IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference (WCNC), Hong Kong, China, March 2007, pp.3400–3405.

  15. Calandriello G, Papadimitratos P, Lloy A, Hubaux J P. Efficient and robust pseudonymous authentication in VANET. In Proc. the Fourth ACM International Workshop on Vehicular Ad Hoc Networks (VANET 2007), in Conjunction with ACM MobiCom 2007, Montreal, Canada, 2007, pp.19–28.

  16. Gedik B, Liu L. Location privacy in mobile systems: A personalized anonymization model. In Proc. the 25th International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems, Columbus, Ohio, USA, Jun. 2005, pp.620–629.

  17. Reid D B. An algorithm for tracking multiple targets. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, Dec. 1979, 24(6): 843–854.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Rivest R L, Shamir A, Tauman Y. How to leak a secret. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 2248, 2001, pp.552–565. http://citeseer.ist.psu.edu/rivest01how.html.

  19. Schechter S, Parnell T, Hartemink A. Anonymous authentication of membership in dynamic groups. In Proc. the Third International Conference on Financial Data Security and Digital Commerce, Anguilla, British West Indies, Jan. 1999, pp.184–195.

  20. Auto theft key statistics. Insurance Information Institute, 2007, http://www.iii.org/.

  21. GM OnStar System Could Halt Stolen Cars. Associated Press, 2007.

  22. Zeng X, Bagrodia R, Gerla M. GloMoSim: A library for parallel simulation of large-scale wireless networks. In Proc. Workshop on Parallel and Distributed Simulation, Banff, Alberta, Canada, 1998, pp.154–161.

  23. Yin J, ElBatt T, Yeung G, Ryu B, Habermas S, Krishnan H, Talty T. Performance evaluation of safety applications over DSRC vehicular ad hoc networks. In Proc. the 1st ACM International Workshop on Vehicular Ad Hoc Networks, Philadelphia, PA, USA, Oct. 2004, pp.1–9.

  24. Gruteser M, Grunwald D. Anonymous usage of location-based services through spatial and temporal cloaking. In Proc. ACM MobiSys'03, San Francisco, CA, USA, May 2003, pp.31–42.

  25. Munaka T, Yamamoto T, Watanabe T. A reliable advanced-join system for data multicasting in its networks. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, Dec. 2005, 6(4): 424–437.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. TrafNet: Real-time seattle area traffic conditions over the Internet. University of Washington, 2006, http://www. its.washington.edu/trafnet/.

  27. Aijaz A, Bochow B, Dötzer F, Festag A, Gerlach M, Kroh R. Attacks on inter-vehicle communication systems — An analysis. In Proc. 3rd International Workshop on Intelligent Transportation (WIT 2006), Hamburg, Germany, March 2006.

  28. Zarki M, Mehrotra S, Tsudik G, Venkatasubramanian N. Security issues in a future vehicular network. In Proc. EuroWireless 2002, Florence, Italy, Feb. 2002.

  29. Ren K et al. A novel privacy preserving authentication and access control scheme for pervasive computing environments. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 2006, 55(4): 1373–1384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yong Xi.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

(PDF 66.1 kb).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Xi, Y., Sha, KW., Shi, WS. et al. Probabilistic Adaptive Anonymous Authentication in Vehicular Networks. J. Comput. Sci. Technol. 23, 916–928 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11390-008-9194-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11390-008-9194-z

Keywords

Navigation