Abstract
A new fuzzy set theory, C-fuzzy set theory, is introduced in this paper. It is a particular case of the classical set theory and satisfies all formulas of the classical set theory. To add a limitation to C-fuzzy set system, in which all fuzzy sets must be “non-uniform inclusive” to each other, then it forms a family of sub-systems, the Z-fuzzy set family. It can be proved that the Z 0-fuzzy set system, one of Z-fuzzy set systems, is equivalent to Zadeh’s fuzzy set system. Analysis shows that 1) Zadeh’s fuzzy set system defines the relations A = B and A ⊆ B between two fuzzy sets A and B as “∀u ∈ U, (μ A ∈ (u) = μ B (u))” and “∀u ∈ U, (μ A (u) ≤ μ B (u))” respectively is inappropriate, because it makes all fuzzy sets be “non-uniformly inclusive”; 2) it is also inappropriate to define two fuzzy sets’ union and intersection operations as the max and min of their grades of membership, because this prevents fuzzy set’s ability to correctly reflect different kinds of fuzzy phenomenon in the natural world. Then it has to work around the problem by invent unnatural functions that are hard to understand, such as augmenting max and min for union and intersection to min{a + b, 1} and max{a + b – 1, 0}, but these functions are incorrect on inclusive case. If both pairs of definitions are used together, not only are they unnatural, but also they are still unable to cover all possible set relationships in the natural world; and 3) it is incorrect to define the set complement as 1 – μ A (u), because it can be proved that set complement cannot exist in Zadeh’s fuzzy set, and it causes confusion in logic and thinking. And it is seriously mistaken to believe that logics of fuzzy sets necessarily go against classical and normal thinking, logic, and conception. The C-fuzzy set theory proposed in this paper overcomes all of the above errors and shortcomings, and more reasonably reflects fuzzy phenomenon in the natural world. It satisfies all relations, formulas, and operations of the classical set theory. It is consistent with normal, natural, and classical thinking, logic, and concepts.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.References
Zadeh L A. Fuzzy sets. Inform. and Control, 1965, 8(3): 338–353.
Dubois D, Prade H. Fuzzy Sets and Systems: Theory and Applications. New York: Academic Press, 1980.
Shimoda M. A natural interpretation of fuzzy sets and fuzzy relations. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 2002, 128(2): 135–147.
Coletti G, Scozzafava R. Conditional probability, fuzzy sets, and possibility: A unifying view. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 2004, 144(1): 227–249.
Pieget A. A new definition of the fuzzy set. Int. J. Appl. Math. Comput. Sci., 2005, 15(1): 125–140.
Gao Q S. Testification for bug of Zadeh-fuzzy set theory and improvement. Journal of Dalian University of Technology, 2005, 45(5): 772–780. (in Chinese)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This work is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant No. 60343010, the National Basic Research 973 Program of China under Grant No. 2003 CB317000 and the Foundation of Institute of Computing Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences under Grant No. 20056510.
Electronic Supplementary Material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gao, QS., Gao, XY. & Hu, Y. A New Fuzzy Set Theory Satisfying All Classical Set Formulas. J. Comput. Sci. Technol. 24, 798–804 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11390-009-9250-3
Received:
Revised:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11390-009-9250-3