Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

PTM: A Topic Model for the Inferring of the Penalty

  • Regular Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Computer Science and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Deciding the penalty of a law case has always been a complex process, which may involve with much coordination. Despite the judicial study based on the rules and conditions, artificial intelligence and machine learning has rarely been used to study the problem of penalty inferring, leaving the large amount of law cases as well as various factors among them untouched. This paper aims to incorporate the state-of-the-art artificial intelligence methods to exploit to what extent this problem can be alleviated. We first analyze 145 000 law cases and observe that there are two sorts of labels, temporal labels and spatial labels, which have unique characteristics. Temporal labels and spatial labels tend to converge towards the final penalty, on condition that the cases are of the same category. In light of this, we propose a latent-class probabilistic generative model, namely Penalty Topic Model (PTM), to infer the topic of law cases, and the temporal and spatial patterns of topics embedded in the case judgment. Then, the learnt knowledge is utilized to automatically cluster all cases accordingly in a unified way. We conduct extensive experiments to evaluate the performance of the proposed PTM on a real large-scale dataset of law cases. The experimental results show the superiority of our proposed PTM.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Boyer M, Lewis T R, Liu W L. Setting standards for credible compliance and law enforcement. Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d’économique, 2000, 33(2): 319-340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Becker G S. Crime and punishment: An economic approach. The Journal Political Ewnomy, 1968, 76(2): 169-217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Kilgour D M, Fang L, Hipel KW. Game-theoretic analyses of enforcement of environmental laws and regulations. Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 1992, 28(1): 141-153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. P’ng I P. Strategic behavior in suit, settlement, and trial. The Bell Journal of Economics, 1983, 14(2): 539-550.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Daughety A F, Reinganum J F. Keeping society in the dark: On the admissibility of pretrial negotiations as evidence in court. The RAND Journal of Economics, 1995, 26(2): 203-221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Polinsky A M, Shavell S. Punitive damages: An economic analysis. Harvard Law Review, 1998, 111(4): 869-962.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Earnhart D. Enforcement of environmental protection laws under communism and democracy. The Journal of Law and Economics, 1997, 40(2): 377-402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Yin H, Cui B, Sun Y, Hu Z, Chen L. Lcars: A spatial item recommender system. ACM Transactions on Information Systems, 2014, 32(3): Article No. 11.

  9. Yuan Q, Cong G, Ma Z, Sun A, Thalmann N M. Time-aware point-of-interest recommendation. In Proc. the 36th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, July 2013, pp.363-372.

  10. Gao H, Tang J, Hu X, Liu H. Exploring temporal effects for location recommendation on location-based social networks. In Proc. the 7th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems, October 2013, pp.93-100.

  11. Wallach H M, Mimno D M, McCallum A. Rethinking LDA: Why priors matter. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 2009, 23: 1973-1981.

  12. Yin H, Sun Y, Cui B, Hu Z, Chen L. LCARS: A location-content-aware recommender system. In Proc. the 19th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, August 2013, pp.221-229.

  13. Tang J, Wu S, Sun J, Su H. Cross-domain collaboration recommendation. In Proc. the 18th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, August 2012, pp.1285-1293.

  14. Cortes C, Vapnik V. Support-vector networks. Machine Learning, 1995, 20(3): 273-297.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Joulin A, Grave E, Bojanowski P, Mikolov T. Bag of tricks for efficient text classification. In Proc. the 15th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, April 2017, pp.427-431.

  16. Kim Y. Convolutional neural networks for sentence classification. arXiv:1408.5882. 2014. https://arxiv.org/abs/1408.5882, April 2018.

  17. Herlocker J L, Konstan J A, Terveen L G, Riedl J T. Evaluating collaborative filtering recommender systems. ACM Transactions on Information Systems, 2004, 22(1): 5-53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Linden G, Smith B, York J. Amazon.com recommendations: Item-to-item collaborative filtering. IEEE Internet Computing, 2003, 7(1): 76-80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Resnick P, Iacovou N, Suchak M, Bergstrom P, Riedl J. Grouplens: An open architecture for collaborative filtering of netnews. In Proc. the 1994 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, October 1994, pp.175-186.

  20. Sarwar B, Karypis G, Konstan J, Riedl J. Item-based collaborative filtering recommendation algorithms. In Proc. the 10th International Conference on World Wide Web, May 2001, pp.285-295.

  21. Chee S H S, Han J, Wang K. Rectree: An efficient collaborative filtering method. In Proc. the 3rd International Conference on Data Warehousing and Knowledge Discovery, September 2001, pp.141-151.

  22. Chowdhury G. Introduction to Modern Information Retrieval (3rd edition). Facet Publishing, 2010.

  23. Su X, Khoshgoftaar TM, Greiner R. A mixture imputation-boosted collaborative filter. In Proc. the 21st International Florida Artificial Intelligence Research Socitey Conference, May 2008, pp.312-316.

  24. Blei D M, Ng A Y, Jordan M I. Latent Dirichlet allocation. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 2003, 3(Jan): 993-1022.

  25. Hofmann T. Probabilistic latent semantic analysis. In Proc. the 15th Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, July 1999, pp.289-296.

  26. Hong L, Ahmed A, Gurumurthy S, Smola A J, Tsioutsiouliklis K. Discovering geographical topics in the twitter stream. In Proc. the 21st International Conference on World Wide Web, April 2012, pp.769-778.

  27. Yuan Q, Cong G, Ma Z, Sun A, Thalmann N M. Who, where, when and what: Discover spatiotemporal topics for twitter users. In Proc. the 19th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, August 2013, pp.605-613.

  28. Wang X, McCallum A. Topics over time: A non-MARKOV continuous-time model of topical trends. In Proc. the 12th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, August 2006, pp.424-433.

  29. Hong L, Yin D, Guo J, Davison B D. Tracking trends: Incorporating term volume into temporal topic models. In Proc. the 17th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, August 2011, pp.484-492.

  30. Yin H, Cui B, Huang Z, Wang W, Wu X, Zhou X. Joint modeling of users’ interests and mobility patterns for point-of-interest recommendation. In Proc. the 23rd ACM International Conference on Multimedia, October 2015, pp.819-822.

  31. Eisenstein J, O’Connor B, Smith N A, Xing E P. A latent variable model for geographic lexical variation. In Proc. the 2010 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, October 2010, pp.1277-1287.

  32. Hu B, Ester M. Spatial topic modeling in online social media for location recommendation. In Proc. the 7th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems, October 2013, pp.25-32.

  33. Yin Z, Cao L, Han J, Zhai C, Huang T. Geographical topic discovery and comparison. In Proc. the 20th International Conference on World Wide Web, March 2011, pp.247-256.

  34. Wang W, Yin H, Chen L, Sun Y, Sadiq S, Zhou X. Geo-SAGE: A geographical sparse additive generative model for spatial item recommendation. In Proc. the 21st ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, August 2015, pp.1255-1264.

  35. Yin H, Zhou X, Shao Y, Wang H, Sadiq S. Joint modeling of user check-in behaviors for point-of-interest recommendation. In Proc. the 24th ACM International on Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, October 2015, pp.1631-1640.

  36. Yin H, Cui B, Lu H, Huang Y, Yao J. A unified model for stable and temporal topic detection from social media data. In Proc. the 29th International Conference on Data Engineering, April 2013, pp.661-672.

  37. Yin H, Cui B, Chen L, Hu Z, Huang Z. A temporal context-aware model for user behavior modeling in social media systems. In Proc. the 2014 ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data, June 2014, pp.1543-1554.

  38. Yin H, Cui B, Chen L, Hu Z, Zhou X. Dynamic user modeling in social media systems. ACM Transactions on Information Systems, 2015, 33(3): Article No. 10.

  39. Dau-Schmidt K G, Gallo J, Parker C, Craycraft J. Criminal penalties under the Sherman act: A study of law and economics. Research in Law and Economics, 1994, 16: 25-71.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Andreoni J. Reasonable doubt and the optimal magnitude of fines: Should the penalty fit the crime? The RAND Journal of Economics, 1991, 1(1): 385-395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Saha A, Poole G. The economics of crime and punishment: An analysis of optimal penalty. Economics Letters, 2000, 68(2): 191-196.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  42. Schweighofer E, Rauber A, Dittenbach M. Automatic text representation, classification and labeling in European law. In Proc. the 8th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, May 2001, pp.78-87.

  43. Feess E, Schramm M, Wohlschlegel A. The impact of fine size and uncertainty on punishment and deterrence: Theory and evidence from the laboratory. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 2018, 149: 58-73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Software Institute, Nanjing University, Nanjing, 210093, China

    Tie-Ke He, Hao Lian, Ze-Min Qin, Zhen-Yu Chen & Bin Luo

  2. National Key Laboratory for Novel Software Technology, Nanjing University, Nanjing, 210093, China

    Tie-Ke He, Hao Lian, Ze-Min Qin, Zhen-Yu Chen & Bin Luo

Authors
  1. Tie-Ke He
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Hao Lian
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ze-Min Qin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Zhen-Yu Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Bin Luo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tie-Ke He.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

ESM 1

(PDF 384 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

He, TK., Lian, H., Qin, ZM. et al. PTM: A Topic Model for the Inferring of the Penalty. J. Comput. Sci. Technol. 33, 756–767 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11390-018-1854-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11390-018-1854-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation