Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Approximation Designs for Energy Harvesting Relay Deployment in Wireless Sensor Networks

  • Regular Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Computer Science and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Energy harvesting technologies allow wireless devices to be recharged by the surrounding environment, providing wireless sensor networks (WSNs) with higher performance and longer lifetime. However, directly building a wireless sensor network with energy harvesting nodes is very costly. A compromise is upgrading existing networks with energy harvesting technologies. In this paper, we focus on prolonging the lifetime of WSNs with the help of energy harvesting relays (EHRs). EHRs are responsible for forwarding data for sensor nodes, allowing them to become terminals and thus extending their lifetime. We aim to deploy a minimum number of relays covering the whole network. As EHRs have several special properties such as the energy harvesting and depletion rate, it brings great research challenges to seek an optimal deployment strategy. To this end, we propose an approximation algorithm named Effective Relay Deployment Algorithm, which can be divided into two phases: disk covering and connector insertion using the partitioning technique and the Steinerization technique, respectively. Based on probabilistic analysis, we further optimize the performance ratio of our algorithm to (5 + 6/K) where K is an integer denoting the side length of a cell after partitioning. Our extensive simulation results show that our algorithm can reduce the number of EHRs to be deployed by up to 45% compared with previous work and thus validate the efficiency and effectiveness of our solution.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Wahyono I, Asfani K, Mohamad M, Rosyid H, Afandi A, Aripriharta. The new intelligent wireless sensor network using artificial intelligence for building fire disasters. In Proc. the 3rd International Conference on Vocational Education and Electrical Engineering, October 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ICVEE50212.2020.9243210.

  2. Feng S, Shi H, Huang L, Shen S, Yu S, Peng H, Wu C. Unknown hostile environment-oriented autonomous WSN deployment using a mobile robot. Journal of Network and Computer Applications, 2021, 182: Article No. 103053. DOI: 10.1016/j.jnca.2021.103053.

  3. Seo J, Park H. Forest environment monitoring application of intelligence embedded based on wireless sensor networks. KSII Transactions on Internet and Information Systems, 2016, 10(4): 1555-1570. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3837/tiis.2016.04.005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Zhou Y, Liu L, Wang L, Hui N, Cui X, Wu J, Peng Y, Qi Y, Xing C. Service-aware 6G: An intelligent and open network based on the convergence of communication, computing and caching. Digital Communications and Networks, 2020, 6(3): 253-260. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcan.2020.05.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Zhou Y, Tian L, Liu L, Qi Y. Fog computing enabled future mobile communication networks: A convergence of communication and computing. IEEE Communications Magazine, 2019, 57(5): 20-27. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/MCOM.2019.1800235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Zhou Y, Liu H, Pan Z, Tian L, Shi J. Cooperative multicast with location aware distributed mobile relay selection: Performance analysis and optimized design. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 2017, 66(9): 8291-8302. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TVT.2017.2682903.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Hou Y, Shi Y, Sherali H, Midkiff S. Prolonging sensor network lifetime with energy provisioning and relay node placement. In Proc. the 2nd Annual IEEE Communications Society Conference on Sensor and Ad Hoc Communications and Networks, September 2005, pp.295-304. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/SAHCN.2005.1557084.

  8. Rahman M N, Matin M A. Efficient algorithm for prolonging network lifetime of wireless sensor networks. Tsinghua Science and Technology, 2011, 16(6): 561-568. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1007-0214(11)70075-X.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Zhang W, Xue G, Misra S. Fault-tolerant relay node placement in wireless sensor networks: Problems and algorithms. In Proc. the 26th IEEE International Conference on Computer Communications, May 2007, pp.1649-1657. DOI: 10.1109/INFCOM.2007.193.

  10. Ku M L, Li W, Chen Y, Ray Liu K J. Advances in energy harvesting communications: Past, present, and future challenges. IEEE Communications Surveys Tutorials, 2016, 18(2): 1384-1412. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/COMST.2015.2497324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Atapattu S, Jiang H, Evans J, Tellambura C. Timeswitching energy harvesting in relay networks. In Proc. the IEEE International Conference on Communications, June 2015, pp.5416-5421. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ICC.2015.7249185.

  12. Ji B, Chen Z, Li Y, Chen S, Zheng G, Wen H. Energy harvesting and information transmission scheme with UAV relay cooperation. EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking, 2019: Article No. 278. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13638-019-1598-7.

  13. Sharma S, Roy S D, Kundu S. Secure communication with energy harvesting multiple half-duplex DF relays assisted with jamming. Wireless Networks, 2020, 26(2): 1151-1164. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11276-018-1859-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Raghunathan V, Kansal A, Hsu J, Friedman J, SrivastavaM B. Design considerations for solar energy harvesting wireless embedded systems. In Proc. the International Symposium on Information Processing in Sensor Networks, April 2005, pp.457-462. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/IPSN.2005.1440973.

  15. Meninger S, Mur-Miranda J O, Amirtharajah R, Chandrakasan A, Lang J H. Vibration-to-electric energy conversion. IEEE Transactions on Very Large Scale Integration (VLSI) Systems, 2001, 9(1): 64-76. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/92.920820.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. He S, Wang W. Location-aware QoE-driven wireless relay deployment for energy efficient multimedia communications. In Proc. the 17th International Symposium on Web and Wireless Geographical Information Systems, May 2019, pp.160-173. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-17246-613.

  17. Zhao M, Zhao J, Zhou W, Zhu J, Zhang S. Energy efficiency optimization in relay-assisted networks with energy harvesting relay constraints. China Communications, 2015, 12(2): 84-94. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/CC.2015.7084404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. In C, Kim H, Choi W. Achievable rate-energy region in two-way decode-and-forward energy harvesting relay systems. IEEE Transactions on Communications, 2019, 67(6): 3923-3935. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TCOMM.2019.2901783.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Bhowmick A, Chatterjee A, Verma T. Performance of DF relaying in an energy harvesting full duplex cognitive radio network. In Proc. the International Conference on Vision Towards Emerging Trends in Communication and Networking, March 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ViTECoN.2019.8899470.

  20. Rao Y S, Madhukumar A S, Sirigina R P. RF energy harvesting based relays: Non-orthogonal AF vs dynamic DF. In Proc. the 20th International Symposium on Wireless Personal Multimedia Communications, December 2017, pp.506-510. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/WPMC.2017.8301865.

  21. Jiang D, Zheng H, Tang D, Tang Y. Relay selection and power allocation for cognitive energy harvesting two-way relaying networks. In Proc. the 5th IEEE International Conference on Electronics Information and Emergency Communication, May 2015, pp.163-166. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ICEIEC.2015.7284511.

  22. Song X, Xu S. Joint optimal power allocation and relay selection in full-duplex energy harvesting relay networks. In Proc. the 10th International Conference on Communication Software and Networks, July 2018, pp.80-84. DOI: 10.1109/ICCSN.2018.8488216.

  23. Djenouri D, Bagaa M. Energy harvesting aware relay node addition for power-efficient coverage in wireless sensor networks. In Proc. the 2015 IEEE International Conference on Communications, June 2015, pp.86-91. DOI: 10.1109/ICC.2015.7248303.

  24. Zhu X, Li J, Zhou M. Optimal deployment of energy-harvesting directional sensor networks for target coverage. IEEE Systems Journal, 2019, 13(1): 377-388. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/JSYST.2018.2820085.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Qiao G, Leng S, Zhang K, Yang K. Joint deployment and mobility management of energy harvesting small cells in heterogeneous networks. IEEE Access, 2017, 5: 183-196. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2016.2635878.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Verdonck L, Beullens P, Caris A, Ramaekers K, Janssens G K. Analysis of collaborative savings and cost allocation techniques for the cooperative carrier facility location problem. The Journal of the Operational Research Society, 2016, 67(6): 853-871. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/jors.2015.106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Wu S, Yang J, Peng R, Zhai Q. Optimal design of facility allocation and maintenance strategy for a cellular network. Reliability Engineering System Safety, 2021, 205: Article No. 107253. DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2020.107253.

  28. Garcia V, Zhou Y, Shi J. Coordinated multipoint transmission in dense cellular networks with usercentric adaptive clustering. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 2014, 13(8): 4297-4308. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TWC.2014.2316500.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Basappa M, Acharyya R, Das G K. Unit disk cover problem in 2D. Journal of Discrete Algorithms, 2015, 33: 193-201. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jda.2015.05.002.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  30. Biniaz A, Liu P, Maheshwari A, Smid M. Approximation algorithms for the unit disk cover problem in 2D and 3D. Computational Geometry: Theory and Applications, 2017, 60: 8-18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comgeo.2016.04.002.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  31. Zhou Y, Liu H, Pan Z, Tian L, Shi J, Yang G. Two-stage cooperative multicast transmission with optimized power consumption and guaranteed coverage. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 2014, 32(2): 274-284. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/JSAC.2014.141208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Misra S, Majd N E, Huang H. Approximation algorithms for constrained relay node placement in energy harvesting wireless sensor networks. IEEE Transactions on Computers, 2014, 63(12): 2933-2947. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TC.2013.171.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  33. Luo Y, Zhang J, Letaief K B. Optimal scheduling and power allocation for two-hop energy harvesting communication systems. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 2013, 12(9): 4729-4741. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TW.2013.081413.122021.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Misra S, Majd N E, Huang H. Constrained relay node placement in energy harvesting wireless sensor networks. In Proc. the 8th IEEE International Conference on Mobile Ad-Hoc and Sensor Systems, October 2011, pp.25-34. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/MASS.2011.137.

  35. Xu S, Shen H. The fault-tolerant facility allocation problem. In Proc. the 20th International Symposium on Algorithms and Computation, December 2009, pp.689-698. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-10631_6_70.

  36. Tsao Y C, Mangotra D, Lu J C, Dong M. A continuous approximation approach for the integrated facility-inventory allocation problem. European Journal of Operational Research, 2012, 222(2): 216-228. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2012.04.033.

  37. Chen W, Chen H, Zhao F. Energy and spectral efficient mobile relay deployment in relay-aided cellular networks. In Proc. the 2015 International Conference on Wireless Communications & Signal Processing, October 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/WCSP.2015.7340992.

  38. Chang J, Chen Y. A relay station deployment scheme with a rotational clustering algorithm for multi-hop relay networks. In Proc. the 2016 International Conference on System Science and Engineering, July 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSSE.2016.7551543.

  39. Chang B, Liang Y, Su S. Analyses of QoS-based relay deployment in 4G LTE-A wireless mobile relay networks. In Proc. the 1st Asia-Pacific Conference on Communications, October 2015, pp.62-67. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/APCC.2015.7412581.

  40. Gan X, Lu H, Yang G Y. Improving energy efficiency by optimizing relay nodes deployment in wireless sensor networks. In Proc. the 9th IEEE International Conference on Communication Software and Networks, May 2017, pp.306-310. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCSN.2017.8230125.

  41. Li Y, Zhang Y, Zhou H, Jiang T. To relay or not to relay: Open distance and optimal deployment for linear underwater acoustic networks. IEEE Transactions on Communications, 2018, 66(9): 3797-3808. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TCOMM.2018.2822287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Cui Q, Yang X, Hämäläinen J, Tao X, Zhang P. Optimal energy-efficient relay deployment for the bidirectional relay transmission schemes. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 2014, 63(6): 2625-2641. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TVT.2013.2295413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Lin G H, Xue G. Steiner tree problem with minimum number of Steiner points and bounded edge-length. Information Processing Letters, 1999, 69(2): 53-57. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-0190(98)00201-4.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  44. Chen D, Du D Z, Hu X D, Lin G H, Wang L, Xue G. Approximations for Steiner trees with minimum number of Steiner points. Theoretical Computer Science, 2001, 262(1/2): 83-99. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3975(00)00182-1.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  45. Du D Z, Wang L, Xu B. The Euclidean bottleneck Steiner tree and Steiner tree with minimum number of Steiner points. In Proc. the 7th Annual International Conference on Computing and Combinatorics, August 2001, pp.509–518. DOI: 10.1007/3-540-44679-6_57.

  46. Măndoiu I I, Zelikovsky A. A note on the MST heuristic for bounded edge-length Steiner trees with minimum number of Steiner points. Information Processing Letters, 2000, 75(4): 165-167. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-0190(00)00095-8.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  47. Liu L, Zhou Y, Yuan J, Zhuang W, Wang Y. Economically optimal MS association for multimedia content delivery in cache-enabled heterogeneous cloud radio access networks. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 2019, 37(7): 1584-1593. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/JSAC.2019.2916280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Liu L, Zhou Y, Yuan W Z, Tian L. Tractable coverage analysis for hexagonal macrocell-based heterogeneous UDNs with adaptive interference-aware CoMP. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 2019, 18(1): 503-517. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TWC.2018.2882434.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Liu L, Zhou Y, Garcia V, Tian L, Shi J. Load aware joint CoMP clustering and inter-cell resource scheduling in heterogeneous ultra dense cellular networks. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 2018, 67(3): 2741-2755. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TVT.2017.2773640.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Kashyap A, Khuller S, Shayman M A. Relay placement for higher order connectivity in wireless sensor networks. In Proc. the 2006 IEEE International Conference on Computer Communications, April 2006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/INFOCOM.2006.273.

  51. Bredin J, Demaine E D, Hajiaghayi M T, Rus D. Deploying sensor networks with guaranteed capacity and fault tolerance. In Proc. the 6th ACM Interational Symposium on Mobile Ad Hoc Networking and Computing, May 2005, pp.309-319. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/1062689.1062729.

  52. Willson J, Zhang Z, Wu W, Du D. Fault-tolerant coverage with maximum lifetime in wireless sensor networks. In Proc. the 2015 IEEE International Conference on Computer Communications, April 26-May 1, 2015, pp.1364-1372. DOI: 10.1109/INFOCOM.2015.7218513.

  53. Lloyd E L, Xue G. Relay node placement in wireless sensor networks. IEEE Transactions on Computers, 2007, 56(1): 134-138. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TC.2007.250629.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  54. Huang C, Zhang R, Cui S. Optimal power allocation for outage probability minimization in fading channels with energy harvesting constraints. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 2014, 13(2): 1074-1087. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TW.2013.121813.130953.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Luo Y, Zhang J, Letaief K B. Transmit power minimization for wireless networks with energy harvesting relays. IEEE Transactions on Communications, 2016, 64(3): 987-1000. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TCOMM.2016.2519418.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Sudevalayam S, Kulkarni P. Energy harvesting sensor nodes: Survey and implications. IEEE Communications Surveys and Tutorials, 2011, 13(3): 443-461. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/SURV.2011.060710.00094.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Lee J, Leyffer S. Mixed Integer Nonlinear Programming. Springer, 2012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-1927-3.

  58. Fowler R J, Paterson M, Tanimoto S L. Optimal packing and covering in the plane are NP-complete. Information Processing Letters, 1981, 12(3): 133-137. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0020-0190(81)90111-3.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  59. Du D Z, Ko K I, Hu X. Design and Analysis of Approximation Algorithms. Springe, 2012.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xiao-Feng Gao.

Supplementary Information

ESM 1

(PDF 284 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, Y., Liu, YX., Zhu, SJ. et al. Approximation Designs for Energy Harvesting Relay Deployment in Wireless Sensor Networks. J. Comput. Sci. Technol. 37, 779–796 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11390-022-1964-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11390-022-1964-5

Keywords

Navigation