Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

R-U-Typing-2-Me? Evolving a chat tool to increase understanding in learning activities

  • Published:
International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning Aims and scope Submit manuscript

    We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

    Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Abstract

Very often, when using a chat tool where more than one participant is talking simultaneously, it is difficult to follow the conversation, read all the different messages and work out who is talking to whom about what. This problem has been dubbed “Chat Confusion.” This article investigates this problem in debate sessions in an online university course. Chat Confusion has been singled out as the main limitation to using chat in educational activities. Confusion needs to be reduced for understanding to increase, making it easier to track what is being discussed during a learning activity. This study investigated the phenomena responsible for causing this confusion. A version of the Mediated Chat tool was developed for each problem identified and was subsequently tested in online courses. This article describes the Mediated Chat development process, the problems identified, and the results obtained from the case studies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

References

  • Baker, K., Greenberg, S., & Gutwin, C. (2001). Heuristic evaluation of groupware based on the mechanics of collaboration. Proceedings of the 8th IFIP Working Conference on Engineering for Human-Computer Interaction (ECHI‘01). Toronto.

  • Baron, N. S. (1984). Computer mediated communication as a force in language change. Visible Language, 18(2), 118–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borghoff, U. M., & Schlichter, J. H. (2000). Computer-supported cooperative work: Introduction to distributed applications. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, A., Joseph, D., & Bielaczyc, K. (2004). Design research: Theoretical and methodological issues. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(1), 15–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conklin, J. (1988). Hypertext: An introduction and survey. In I. Greif (Ed.), Computer supported cooperative work: A book of readings (pp. 423–476). San Mateo, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cornelius, C., & Boos, M. (2003). Enhancing mutual understanding in synchronous computer-mediated bommunication by training: Trade-offs in dudgmental tasks. Communication Research, 30, 147–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crystal, D. (1985). A dictionary of linguistics and phonetics. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeSanctis, G., & Gallupe, B. (1987). A foundation for the study of group decision support systems. Management Science, 33(5), 589–609.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, C. A. (2000). An evaluation framework for collaborative systems (Technical Report CU-CS-901-00). Boulder, CO: Colorado University.

  • Ellis, C. A., Gibbs, S. J., & Rein, G. L. (1991). Groupware—Some issues and experiences. Communications of the ACM, 34(1), 38–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferraz, F. G. (2000). Framework Canais de Comunicação. Undergraduate Computer Science Department, Rio de Janeiro: Catholic University of Rio de Janeiro.

  • Filippo, D., Fuks, H., & Lucena, C. J. P. (2005). AulaNetM: Extension of the AulaNet Environment to PDAs. CEUR Workshop Proceedings, 10—Context and Groupware, Proceedings of the Fifth International and Interdisciplinary Conference on Modeling and Using Contex, Paris.

  • Fuks, H., Gerosa, M. A., & Lucena, C. J. P. (2002). The development and application of distance learning on the internet. Open Learning—The Journal of Open and Distance Learning, 17(1), 23–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuks, H., Raposo, A. B., Gerosa, M. A., & Lucena, C. J. P. (2005). Applying the 3C model to groupware development. International Journal of Cooperative Information Systems (IJCIS), 14(2–3), 299–328.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garcia, A., & Jacobs, J. (1998). The interactional organization of computer mediated communication in the college classroom. Qualitative Sociology, 21(3), 299–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garcia, A., & Jacobs, J. (1999). The eyes of the beholder: Understanding the turn talking system in quasi-synchronous computer mediated communication. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 32(4), 337–367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gerosa, M. A., Pimentel, M., Fuks, H. & Lucena, C. J. P. (2005). No need to read messages right now: Helping mediators to steer educational forums using statistical and visual information. In G. Stahl & D. Suthers, (Eds.), Proceedings of Computer Supported Collaborative Learning 2005 (pp. 160–169). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerosa, M. A., Pimentel, M., Raposo, A. B., Fuks, H., & Lucena, C. J. P. (2005). Towards an engineering approach for groupware development: Learning from the AulaNet LMS development. Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on CSCW in Design (CSCWiD) (pp. 329–333). Coventry, U.K.

  • Herring, S. (1999). Interactional coherence in CMC. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 4(4). Retrieved from http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol4/issue4/herring.html

  • Johnson-Lentz, P., & Johnson-Lentz, T. (1982). Groupware: The process and impacts of design choices. In E. B. Kerr & S. R. Hiltz, (Eds.), Computer-mediated communication systems: Status and evaluation. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laurillau, Y., & Nigay, L. (2002). Clover architecture for groupware. Proceedings of the Computer-Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) (pp. 236–245). New York: ACM Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lonchamp, J. (2005). A structured chat framework for distributed educational settings. In G. Stahl & D. Suthers, (Eds.), Proceedings of Computer-Supported Cooperative Learning (CSCL) 2005 (pp. 403–307). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lucena, C. J. P., Fuks, H., et al. (1998). AulaNet—An environment for the development and maintenance of courses on the web. Proceedings of ICEE‘98—International Conference on Engineering Education. Rio de Janeiro.

  • McAlister, S., Ravenscroft, A., & Scanlon, E. (2004). Combining interaction and context design to support collaborative argumentation using a tool for synchronous CMC. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, Special Issue: Developing dialogue for learning, 20(3), 194–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGrath, J. E. (1990). Time matters in groups. Intellectual teamwork: Social and technical foundations of cooperative work (pp. 23–61). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mühlpfordt, M., & Wessner, M. (2005). Explicit referencing in chat supports collaborative learning. In G. Stahl & D. Suthers, (Eds.), Proceedings of Computer-Supported Cooperative Learning (CSCL) 2005 (pp. 460–469). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oikarinen, J., & Reed, D. (1993). Internet relay chat protocol (RFC 1459). Network Working Group. Retrieved from http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc1459.html.

  • O'Neill, J., & Martin, D. (2003). Text chat in action. Proceedings of the 2003 International ACM SIGGROUP Conference on Supporting Group Work (pp. 40–49). New York: ACM Press.

  • Pimentel, M. (2002). HiperDiálogo: Ferramenta de bate-papo para diminuir a perda de co-texto. Master's dissertation, Computer Science Department of Federal University of Rio de Janeiro.

  • Pimentel, M., Fuks, H., & Lucena, C. J. P. (2003). Co-text loss in textual chat tools. Proceedings of the 4th International and Interdisciplinary Conference on Modeling and Using Context (pp. 483–490). Stanford.

  • Pimentel, M., Fuks, H., & Lucena, C. J. P. (2004). Mediated chat 2.0: Embbeding coordination into chat tools. Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on the Design of Cooperative Systems (pp. 99–103). Hyères: IOS Press.

  • Pimentel, M., Fuks, H., & Lucena, C. J. P. (2005). Mediated chat development process: Avoiding chat confusion on educational debates. In G. Stahl & D. Suthers, (Eds.), Proceedings of Computer Supported Collaborative Learning (CSCL) 2005 (pp. 499–503). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raposo, A. B., Pimentel, M. G., Gerosa, M. A., Fuks, H., & Lucena, C. J. P. (2004). Prescribing e-learning activities using workflow technologies. Proceedings of the 1st International Workshop on Computer Supported Activity Coordination (CSAC) (pp. 71–80). http://www.iceis.org/iceis2004/workshops/csac/csac2004-cfp.html

  • Rezende, J. L. (2003). Aplicando técnicas de comunicação para a facilitação de debates no ambiente AulaNet. Master's dissertation, Computer Science Department of the Catholic University of Rio de Janeiro.

  • Smith, M., Cadiz, J. J., & Burkhalter, B. (2000). Conversation trees and threaded chats. Proceedings of the 2000 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (pp. 97–105). New York: ACM Press.

  • Teufel, S., Sauter, C., Mühlherr, T., & Bauknecht, K. (1995). Computerunterstützte gruppenarbeit. Bonn: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thirunarayanan, M. O. (2000). Cutting down on chat confusion: A proposal for managing instructor-controlled chat systems. Ubiquity, 1(38).

  • Toffler, A. (1970). Future Shock. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Viegas, F. B., & Donath, J. S. (1999). Chat circles. Proceedings of the Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. New York: ACM.

  • Vilhjálmsson, H. (2003). Avatar augmented online conversation. Ph.D. dissertation, Program in Media Arts and Sciences, Cambridge: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

  • Vilhjálmsson, H., & Cassell, J. (1998). BodyChat: Autonomous communicative behaviors in avatars. Proceedings of ACM Autonomous Agents ’98 (pp. 269–276), New York: ACM.

  • Werry, C. C. (1996) Linguistic and interactional features of internet relay chat. In S. C. Herring (Ed.). Computer-mediated communication: Linguistic, social and cross-cultural perspectives (pp. 47–63). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winograd, T. (1989). Groupware: The next wave or another advertising slogan? Proceedings of CompCon 89 (pp. 198–200). Washington, DC: IEEE Computer Society Press.

  • Zemel, A. (2005). Texts-in-interaction: Collaborative problem-solving in quasi-synchronous computer-mediated communication. In G. Stahl & D. Suthers, (Eds.), Proceedings of Computer‐Supported Collaborative Learning 2005 (pp. 753–757). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Computer Science Department, Catholic University of Rio de Janeiro (PUC-Rio), R. Marquês de São Vicente, 225–22.453-900, Gávea, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil

    Hugo Fuks, Mariano Pimentel & Carlos José Pereira de Lucena

Authors
  1. Hugo Fuks
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  2. Mariano Pimentel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  3. Carlos José Pereira de Lucena
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hugo Fuks.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fuks, H., Pimentel, M. & Pereira de Lucena, C.J. R-U-Typing-2-Me? Evolving a chat tool to increase understanding in learning activities. Computer Supported Learning 1, 117–142 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-006-6845-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-006-6845-3

Keywords