Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Fostering growth orientations in students’ identities as knowledge builders

  • Published:
International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Fast-moving changes to society as part of the digital age are posing new educational challenges that require students to be flexible, adaptive, and growth-oriented. Humanistic knowledge building communities (HKBCs) are a growth promoting pedagogy, suitable to address these challenges. Yet, the way that students’ identities as knowledge builders are transformed remains undertheorized. In this study, we rise above existing frameworks of fixedness versus fluidity to elucidate how students develop growth orientations. Using a grounded approach, we examined a graduate course, coding 322 relevant utterances that were expressed by the course participants over the semester. This resulted in a five dimensional framework of fixedness versus growth that was used to describe the personal transformation of students within the HKBC. The changes that students made over time were shown to occur at statistically significant levels. This study suggests that learning communities should focus on the complementary nature of collective idea-advancement and personal growth promotion if they are to address the challenges of preparing students for life in a rapidly changing world.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. We use the terms identity, ways of being, and self interchangeably, consistent with other researchers looking at similar phenomena (e.g., Herrenkohl & Mertl 2010).

  2. Pseudonyms are used in all cases to ensure student anonymity. Mod1 refers to the primary moderator and Mod2 to the secondary moderator.

  3. Codes embedded in the text relate to Table 2.

  4. All quotes were originally said or written in [hidden] and have been translated for this article. As part of this study, the meaning of every word was closely examined to make sure the translation was as close as possible to the original intention of the contributor.

References

  • Bang, M., & Vossoughi, S. (2016). Participatory design research and educational justice: Studying learning and relations within social change making. Cognition and Instruction, 34(3), 173–193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barron, B. (2003). When smart groups fail. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12(3), 307–359

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bereiter, C., Cress, U., Fischer, F., Hakkarainen, K., Scardamalia, M., & Vogel, F. (2017). Scripted and unscripted aspects of creative work with knowledge. In. B. Smith, M. Borge, E. Mercier, & K. Y. Lim. Prioritizing equity and access in CSCL, 12th International Conference on CSCL, Volume 1 (pp. 751–760). Philadelphia, PA: International Society of the Learning Sciences

  • Boaler, J. (2016). Mathematical mindsets: Unleashing students’ potential through creative math, inspiring messages and innovative teaching. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass

    Google Scholar 

  • Brock, A., & Hundley, H. (2016). The growth mindset coach: A teacher’s month-by-month handbook for empowering students to achieve. Berkeley, CA: Ulysses Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 32–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charmaz, K. (2008). Grounded theory as an emergent method. In S. N. Hesse-Biber, & P. Leavy (Eds.), Handbook of emergent methods (pp. 155–172). New York: The Guilford Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, B., & Hong, H. Y. (2016). Schools as knowledge building organizations: Thirty years of design research. Educational Psychologist, 51(2), 266–288

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chi, M. T. (1997). Quantifying qualitative analyses of verbal data: A practical guide. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 6(3), 271–315

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, E., & Hod, Y. (2021). Enriching the informing cycle of knowledge building communities by investigating students’ interpretations of design principles. Interactive Learning Environments. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2021.1966638

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, M., O’Hara, M., Schmid, P. F., & Bohart, A. (Eds.). (2013). The handbook of person-centred psychotherapy and counselling. London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan

    Google Scholar 

  • Cornelius-White, J. H. (2013). Congruence. In M. Cooper, M. O’Hara, P. F. Schmid, & A. Bohart (Eds.), The handbook of person-centered psychotherapy and counseling (2nd ed., pp. 193–208). New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Cornelius-White, J. H., & Harbaugh, A. P. (2010). Learner-centered instruction: Building relationships for student success. Los Angeles, CA: Sage publications

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cress, U., Oshima, J., Rosé, C., & Wise, A. F. (Eds.). (2021). Foundations, processes, technologies, and methods: An overview of CSCL through its handbookInternational handbook of computer-supported collaborative learning (pp. 3–22). Cham: Springer

  • De Wever, B., & Strijbos, J. W. (2021). Roles for structuring groups for collaboration. In U. Cress, C. Rosé, A. F. Wise, & J. Oshima (Eds.), International handbook of computer-supported collaborative learning (pp. 315–331). Cham: Springer

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Dweck, C. (2016). What having a “growth mindset” actually means. Harvard Business Review, 13, 213–226

    Google Scholar 

  • Dweck, C. S. (2006). Mindset: The new psychology of success. Random House Incorporated

  • Dweck, C. S., Chiu, C., & Hong, Y. (1995). Implicit theories and their role in judgments and reactions: A world from two perspectives. Psychological Inquiry, 6, 267–285

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Field, A. (2018). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics (5th Edition). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications

  • Gutiérrez, K. D., & Jurow, A. S. (2016). Social design experiments: Toward equity by design. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 25(4), 565–598

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gutiérrez, K. D., & Vossoughi, S. (2010). Lifting off the ground to return anew: Mediated praxis, transformative learning, and social design experiments. Journal of Teacher Education, 61(1–2), 100–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herrenkohl, L. R., & Mertl, V. (2010). How students come to be, know, and do: A case for a broad view of learning. Cambridge University Press

  • Hod, Y., & Ben-Zvi, D. (2018). Co-development patterns of knowledge, experience, and self in humanistic knowledge building communities. Instructional Science, 46(4), 593–619

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hod, Y., & Katz, S. (2020). Fostering highly engaged knowledge building communities in socioemotional and sociocognitive hybrid learning spaces. British Journal of Educational Technologies, 51(4), 1117–1135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hod, Y., Zhang, J., Yuan, G., & Zhou, H. (2018). Taking on the challenges of learning in the digital age: Grade 5 students’ mindsets and strategies in knowledge building communities. In J. Kay and R. Luckin (Eds.), Rethinking Learning in the Digital Age: Making the Learning Sciences Count, 13th International Conference of the Learning Sciences (ICLS), Vol. 2 (pp. 1033–1036). London, UK: International Society of the Learning Sciences

  • Järvelä, S., Hadwin, A. F., Malmberg, J., & Miller, M. (2018). Contemporary perspectives of regulated learning in collaboration. In F. Fischer, C. E. Hmelo-Silver, P. Reimann, & S. R. Goldman (Eds.), Handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 127–136). New York: Taylor & Francis

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Järvelä, S., Malmberg, J., Sobocinski, M., & Kirschner, P. A. (2021). Metacognition in collaborative learning. In U. Cress, C. Rosé, A. F. Wise, & J. Oshima (Eds.), International handbook of computer-supported collaborative learning (pp. 281–294). Cham: Springer

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kerschbaum, S. L., Eisenman, L. T., & Jones, J. M. (Eds.). (2017). Negotiating disability: Disclosure and higher education. University of Michigan Press

  • Kici, D., & Scardamalia, M. (2018). Transformation of Teachers through knowledge building: Utilizing a “growth mindset” in a secondary school. Knowledge building: A place for everyone in a knowledge society, 22nd annual knowledge building summer institute (KBSI), ( (pp. 154–157). Toronto, Canada: Knowledge Building International

    Google Scholar 

  • Koschmann, T. (1999). The cultural turn. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 8(1), 127–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ludvigsen, S., Lund, K., & Oshima, J. (2021). A conceptual stance on CSCL history. In U. Cress, C. Rosé, A. F. Wise, & J. Oshima (Eds.), International handbook of computer-supported collaborative learning (pp. 45–63). Cham: Springer

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ma, L., Resendes, M., Scardamalia, M., & Dobbie, K. (2019). The knowledge building network pilot project: An exploration of emergent designs to enhance collective teacher efficacy. In K. Lund, G., Niccolai, E., Lavoué, C., Hmelo-Silver, G., Gweon, and M. Baker, M. (Eds.). A wide lens: Combining embodied, enactive, extended, and embedded learning in collaborative settings, 13th international conference on CSCL, Volume 1 (pp. 81–87). Lyon, France: International Society of the Learning Sciences

  • Nasir, N. I. S., & Hand, V. (2008). From the court to the classroom: Opportunities for engagement, learning, and identity in basketball and classroom mathematics. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 17(2), 143–179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Näykki, P., Järvenoja, H., Järvelä, S., & Kirschner, P. (2017). Monitoring makes a difference: Quality and temporal variation in teacher education students’ collaborative learning. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 61(1), 31–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2018). The future of education and skills: Education 2030. OECD Education 2030. http://www.oecd.org/education/2030-project/

  • Ouyang, F., & Chang, Y. (2019). The relationships between social participatory roles and cognitive engagement levels in online discussions. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(3), 1396–1414

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paunesku, D., Walton, G. M., Romero, C., Smith, E. N., Yeager, D. S., & Dweck, C. S. (2015). Mind-set interventions are a scalable treatment for academic underachievement.Psychological Science(1–10)

  • Rogers, C. R. (1957). The necessary and sufficient conditions of therapeutic personality change. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 21(2), 95–103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, C. R. (1958). A process conception of psychotherapy. American Psychologist, 13(4), 142–149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, C. R. (1961/1995). On becoming a person: A therapist’s view of psychotherapy. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin

  • Rogers, C. R. (1969). Freedom to Learn. Columbus, OH: Charles Merrill Publishing Company

    Google Scholar 

  • Sagy, O., Kali, Y., Tsaushu, M., & Tal, T. (2016). The culture of learning continuum: Promoting internal values in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 43(3), 416–436

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanders, P. (2006). The person-centered primer. UK: PCCS Books

    Google Scholar 

  • Scardamalia, M. (2002). Collective cognitive responsibility for the advancement of knowledge. In B. Smith (Ed.), Liberal education in a knowledge society (pp. 67–98). Chicago: Open Court

    Google Scholar 

  • Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (1994). Computer support for knowledge-building communities. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 3(3), 265–283

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (2021). Knowledge building: Advancing the state of community knowledge. In U. Cress, C. Rosé, A. F. Wise, & J. Oshima (Eds.), International handbook of computer-supported collaborative learning (pp. 261–279). Cham: Springer

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Schoenfeld, A. H. (2007). Method. In F. K. Lester (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 69–107). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing

    Google Scholar 

  • Stahl, G., & Hakkarainen, K. (2021). Theories of CSCL. In U. Cress, C. Rosé, A. F. Wise, & J. Oshima (Eds.), International handbook of computer-supported collaborative learning (pp. 23–43). Cham: Springer

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Strijbos, J. W., & De Laat, M. F. (2010). Developing the role concept for computer-supported collaborative learning: An explorative synthesis. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(4), 495–505

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tabak, I., & Baumgartner, E. (2004). The teacher as partner: Exploring participant structures, symmetry, and identity work in scaffolding. Cognition and Instruction, 22(4), 393–429

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tao, D., & Zhang, J. (2021). Agency to transform: how did a grade 5 community co-configure dynamic knowledge building practices in a yearlong science inquiry?.International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning,1–32

  • Tewell, E. (2020). The problem with grit: Dismantling deficit thinking in library instruction. Libraries and the Academy, 20(1), 137–159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vea, T. (2020). The learning of emotion in/as sociocultural practice: The case of animal rights activism. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 29(3), 311–346

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yalom, I. D., & Leszcz, M. (2020). The theory and practice of group psychotherapy. New York, NY: Basic Books

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang, Y., van Aalst, J., Chan, C. K. K., & Tien, W. (2016). Reflective assessment in knowledge building by students with low academic achievement. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 11, 281–311

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, J., Hong, H. Y., Scardamalia, M., Teo, C. L., & Morley, E. A. (2011). Sustaining knowledge building as a principle-based innovation at an elementary school. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 20(2), 262–307

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, J., Scardamalia, M., Reeve, R., & Messina, R. (2009). Designs for collective cognitive responsibility in knowledge-building communities. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 18(1), 7–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Haifa, Faculty of Education -Room 509, 199 Abba Houshy, 3498838, Haifa, Israel

    Shiri Kashi & Yotam Hod

Authors
  1. Shiri Kashi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Yotam Hod
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yotam Hod.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kashi, S., Hod, Y. Fostering growth orientations in students’ identities as knowledge builders. Intern. J. Comput.-Support. Collab. Learn 17, 333–360 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-022-09376-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-022-09376-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation