Skip to main content
Log in

Did speculative activities contribute to high crude oil prices during 1993 to 2008?

  • Published:
Journal of Systems Science and Complexity Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

By applying two nonlinear Granger causality testing methods and rolling window strategy to explore the relationship between speculative activities and crude oil prices, the unidirectional Granger causality from speculative activities to returns of crude oil prices during the high price phase is discovered. It is proved that speculative activities did contribute to high crude oil prices after the Asian financial crisis and OPEC's output cut in 1998. The unidirectional Granger causality from returns of crude oil prices to speculative activities is significant in general. But after 2000, with the sharp rise in crude oil prices, this unidirectional Granger causality became a complex nonlinear relationship, which cannot be detected by any linear Granger causality test.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. X. Zhang, K. K. Lai, and S. Y. Wang, A new approach for crude oil price analysis based on empirical mode decomposition, Energy Economics, 2008, 30(3): 905–918.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. X. Zhang, L. Yu, K. K. Lai, and S. Y. Wang, Estimating the impact of extreme events on crude oil price: An EMD-based event analysis method, Energy Economics, 2009, 31(5): 768–778.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. D. R. Sanders, K. Boris, and M. Manfredo, Hedgers, funds, and small speculators in the energy futures markets: An analysis of the CFTC's commitments of traders reports, Energy Economics, 2004, 26(3): 425–445.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. H. Bu, Y. He, and S. Y. Wang, An empirical study to crude oil price volatility in short-term, in Volatility Analysis and Prediction of International Crude Oil Price, Hunan University Press, Changsha, 2008, 18–33.

    Google Scholar 

  5. International Monetary Fund, World Economic Outlook, 2005-09, 2005.

  6. International Monetary Fund, World Economic Outlook, 2006-09, 2006.

  7. M. L. Hartzmark, Luck versus forecast ability: Determinants of trader performance in futures markets, Journal of Business, 1991, 64(1): 49–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. C. Wang, Investor sentiment and return predictability in agricultural futures markets, Journal of Future Markets, 2001, 21(10): 929–952.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. R. M. Leuthold, P. Garcia, and R. Lu, The returns and forecasting ability of large traders in the frozen pork bellies futures market, Journal of Business, 1994, 67(3): 459–473.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. C. Hiemstra and J. D. Jones, Testing for linear and nonlinear granger causality in the stock pricecvolume relation, Journal of Finance, 1994, 49(5): 1639–1664.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. C. Diks and V. Panchenko, A new statistic and practical guidelines for nonparametric granger causality testing, Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 2006, 30(9/10): 1647–1669.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. C. W. J. Granger, Investigating causal relations by econometric models and cross-spectral methods, Econometrica, 1969, 37(3): 424–438.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. I. Asimakopoulos, D. Ayling, and W. Mansor Mahmood, Non-linear granger causality in the currency futures returns, Economics Letters, 2000, 68(1): 25–30.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. C. Ciner, Energy shocks and financial markets: Nonlinear linkages, Studies in Nonlinear Dynamics and Econometrics, 2001, 5(3): 203–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. C. Ciner, The stock price-volume linkage on the toronto stock exchange: Before and after automation, Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 2002, 19(4): 335–349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Y. Ma and A. Kanas, Testing for a nonlinear relationship among fundamentals and exchange rates in the ERM, Journal of International Money and Finance, 2000, 19(1): 135–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. C. Diks and V. Panchenko, A note on the Hiemstra-Jones test for granger non-causality, Studies in Nonlinear Dynamics and Econometrics, 2005, 9(2): 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  18. R. S. Pindyck, The long-run evolution of energy prices, The Energy Journal, 1999, 20(2): 1–27.

    Google Scholar 

  19. C. Hiemstra and C. Kramer, Nonlinearity and endogeneity in macro-asset pricing, Studies in Non-linear Dynamics and Econometrics, 1997, 2(3): 61–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. E. Baek and W. Brock, A general test for non-linear granger causality: Bivariate model, Working paper, Iowa State University and University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI., 1992.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xun Zhang.

Additional information

This research is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zhang, X., Keung Lai, K. & Wang, S. Did speculative activities contribute to high crude oil prices during 1993 to 2008?. J Syst Sci Complex 22, 636–646 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11424-009-9193-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11424-009-9193-3

Key words