Skip to main content
Log in

Group contingency test for two or several independent samples

  • Published:
Journal of Systems Science and Complexity Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper proposes a new and distribution-free test called “Group Contingency” test (GC, for short) for testing two or several independent samples. Compared with traditional nonparametric tests, GC test tends to explore more information based on samples, and it’s location-, scale-, and shapesensitive. The authors conduct some simulation studies comparing GC test with Wilcoxon rank sum test (W), Kolmogorov-Smirnov test (KS) and Wald-Wolfowitz runs test (WW) for two sample case, and with Kruskal-Wallis (KW) for testing several samples. Simulation results reveal that GC test usually outperforms other methods.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Erich L. Lehmann, Parametric versus nonparametrics: Two alternative methodologies, Journal of Nonparametric Statistics, 2009, 21(4): 397–405.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. M. Hollander and D. A. Wolfe, Nonparametric Statistical Methods, 2nd ed., Wiley, New York, 1999.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. P. Sprent and N. C. Smeeton, Applied Nonparametric Statistical Methods, 3rd edition, Chapman and Hall/CRC, Boca Raton, Florida, 2001.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. A. Wald and J. Wolfowitz, On a test whether two samples are from the same population, Ann. Math. Stat., 1940, 11(2): 147–162.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. C. R. Mehta and Nitin R. Patel, A network algorithm for performing fisher’s exact test in ⊙ × ⊙ contingency table test, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 1983, 78(382): 427–434.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. G. J. Gan, C. Q. Ma, and J. H. Wu, Data Clustering: Theory, Algorithms, and Applications, SIAM, Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, 2007.

  7. J. B. MacQueen, Some methods for classification and analysis of multivariate observations, Proceedings of 5-th Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability, Berkeley, University of California Press, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  8. C. R. Magela and S. H. Wibowo, Comparing the powers of the Wald-Wolfowitz and Kolmogorov-Smirnov tests, Biometrical Journal, 1997, 39(6): 665–675.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. J. M. Chambers, Software for Data Analysis: Programming with R (Statistics and Computing), Springer, 2008.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hexin Zhang.

Additional information

This research is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant No. 10731010 and Ph.D. Program Foundation of Ministry of Education of China under Grant No. 20090001110005.

This paper was recommended for publication by Editor Guohua ZOU.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zhang, H., Fang, X. & Ma, X. Group contingency test for two or several independent samples. J Syst Sci Complex 24, 1183–1192 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11424-011-9211-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11424-011-9211-0

Key words