Skip to main content

Advertisement

Springer Nature Link
Log in

Cooperative shift estimation of target trajectory using clustered sensors

  • Published:
Journal of Systems Science and Complexity Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, a mathematical model for target tracking using nonlinear scalar range sensors is formulated first. A time-shift sensor scheduling strategy is addressed on the basis of a k-barrier coverage protocol and all the sensors are divided into two classes of clusters, active cluster, and submissive cluster, for energy-saving. Then two types of time-shift nonlinear filters are proposed for both active and submissive clusters to estimate the trajectory of the moving target with disturbed dynamics. The stochastic stability of the two filters is analyzed. Finally, some numerical simulations are given to demonstrate the effectiveness of the new filters with a comparison of EKF.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles and news from researchers in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.

References

  1. Akyildiz I F, Su W L, Sankarasubramaniam Y, and Cayirci E, A survey on sensor networks, IEEE Communications Magazine, 2002, 40(8): 102–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Brooks R, Ramanathan P, and Sayeed A M, Distributed target classification and tracking in sensor networks, Proc. of IEEE, 2003, 91(8): 1163–1171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Kumar S, Zhao F, and Shepherd D, Collaborative signal and information processing in microsensor networks, IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, 2002, 19(2): 13–14.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Zhao F, Shin J, and Reich J, Information-driven dynamic sensor collaboration for tracking applications, IEEE Signal Processing Magzine, 2002, 19(2): 61–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Brooks R, Griffn C, and Friedlander D, Self-organized distributed sensor network entity tracking, Int. J. of High Performance Comput. Application, 2002, 16(3): 207–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Jazwinski A H, Stochastic Process and Filtering Theory, Dover Publications, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Julier S, Uhlmann J, and Durrant-Whyte H, A new approach for filtering nonlinear system, Proc. of the American Control Conference, Washington, DC, 1995, 1628–1632.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Doucet A, Freitas N D, and Gordon N J, Sequential Monte Carlo Methods in Practice, Springer, 2001.

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Reif K, Gunther S, Yaz E, and Unbehauen R, Stochastic stability of the continuous-time extended Kalman filter, IEE Proc. Contr. Theory and Appl., 2000, 147(1): 45–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Hu J and Hu X, Optimal target trajectory estimation and filtering using networked sensors, Journal of Systems Science and Complexity, 2008, 21(3): 325–336.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Hu J and Hu X, Nonlinear filtering in target tracking using cooperative mobile sensors, Automatica, 2010, 46(12): 2041–2046.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. He Y and Chong E, Sensor scheduling for target tracking in sensor networks, Proc. of the 43rd IEEE CDC, Atlantis, Bahamas, 2004, 743–748.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Atia G K, Veeravalli V, and Fuemmeler J A, Sensor scheduling for energy-efficient target tracking in sensor networks, IEEE Trans. on Signal Processing, 2011, 59(10): 4923–4937.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Kumar S, Lai T H, Posner M E, and Sinha P, Optimal sleep-wakeup algorithms for barriers of wireless wensors, Proc. of the 4th International Conference on Broadband Communications, Networks and Systems (BROADNETS), 2007, 327–336.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Ammari H M and Das S K, Centralized and custered k-coverage protocols for wireless sensor networks, IEEE Trans. on Computers, 2012, 61(1): 118–133.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Kumar S, Lai T H, and Arora A, Barrier coverage with wireless sensors, Proc. of the 11th Annual International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking (ACM MobiCom), 2005, 284–298.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Zhang H and Hou J C, Is deterministic deployment worse than random deployment for wireless sensor networks?, Proc. of the 25th IEEE International Conference on Computer Communications (INFOCOM), Spain, 2006, 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Xing G, Wang X, Zhang Y, Lu C, Pless R, and Gill C, Integrated coverage and connectivity configuration for energy conservation in sensor networks, ACM Trans. Sensor Networks, 2005, 1(1): 36–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Zakai M, On the ultimate boundedness of moments associated with solutions of stochastic differential equations, SIAM J. Control, 1967, 5(4): 588–593.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. Cheng D, Ghosh B, and Hu X, Distributed sensor network for target tracking, Proc. of MTNS 2006, Kyoto, 2006, 2171–2183.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Olfati-Saber R and Murray R, Consensus problems in networks of agents with switching topology and time-delays, IEEE Trans. Automatic Control, 2004, 49(9): 1520–1533.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Automation Engineering, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, 611731, China

    Jiangping Hu

  2. Optimization and Systems Theory and ACCESS Linnaeus Center, Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden

    Xiaoming Hu

  3. Department of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Sophia University, Tokyo, Japan

    Tielong Shen

Authors
  1. Jiangping Hu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  2. Xiaoming Hu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  3. Tielong Shen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jiangping Hu.

Additional information

This work is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant No. 61104104, the Scientific Research Foundation for the Returned Overseas Chinese Scholars, State Education Ministry of China and the Program for New Century Excellent Talents in University under Grant No. NCET-13-0091.

This paper was recommended for publication by Editor ZHANG Jifeng.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hu, J., Hu, X. & Shen, T. Cooperative shift estimation of target trajectory using clustered sensors. J Syst Sci Complex 27, 413–429 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11424-014-2191-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11424-014-2191-0

Key words