Skip to main content
Log in

An active-set projected trust region algorithm for box constrained optimization problems

  • Published:
Journal of Systems Science and Complexity Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

An active-set projected trust region algorithm is proposed for box constrained optimization problems, where the given algorithm is designed by three steps. First, the projected gradient direction which normally has better numerical performance is introduced. Second, the projected trust region direction that often possesses good convergence is defined, where the matrix of trust region subproblem is updated by limited memory strategy. Third, in order to get both good numerical performance and convergence, the authors define the final search which is the convex combination of the projected gradient direction and the projected trust region direction. Under suitable conditions, the global convergence of the given algorithm is established. Numerical results show that the presented method is competitive to other similar methods.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Goldfarb D, Extension of Davidon’s variable metric algorithm to maximization under linear inequality and constraineds, SIAM Journal on Applied Mathematics, 1969, 17: 739–764.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Lueberger D G, Introduction to Linear and Nonlinear Programming, Chapter 11, Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Andretta M, Birgin E G, and Martnez J M, Practical active-set Euclidean trust-region method with spectral projected gradients for bound-constrained minimization, Optimization, 2005, 54: 305–325.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Birgin E G and Gentil J M, Evaluating bound-constrained minimization software, Computational Optimization and Applications, DOI: 10.1007/s10589-012-9466-y.

  5. Birgin E G and Martínez J M, Large-scale active-set box-constrained optimization method with spectral projected gradients, Computational Optimization and Applications, 2002, 23: 101–125.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Facchinei F, Júdice J, and Soares J, An active set Newton algorithm for large-scale nonlinear programs with box constraints, SIAM Journal on Optimization, 1998, 8: 158–186.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Facchinei F, Lucidi S, and Palagi L, A truncated Newton algorithm for large scale box constrained optimization, SIAM Journal on Optimization, 2002, 12: 1100–1125.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Hager W W and Zhang H, A new active set algorithm for box constrained optimization, SIAM Journal on Optimization, 2006, 17: 526–557.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Yuan G and Lu X, An active set limited memory BFGS algorithm for bound constrained optimization, Applied Mathematical Modelling, 2011, 35: 3561–3573.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Bertsekas D P, Projected Newton methods for optimization problems with simple constraints, SIAM Journal on Control and Optimization, 1982, 20: 221–246.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Burke J V and Moré J J, On the identification of active constraints, SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis, 1998, 25: 1197–1211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Calamai P and Moré J J, Projected gradient for linearly constrained programms, Mathematical Programming, 1987, 39: 93–116.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Conn A R, Gould N I M, and Toint Ph L, Global convergence of a class of trust region algorithm for optimization with simple bounds, SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis, 1988, 25: 433–460.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Lescrenier M, Convergence of trust region algorithm for optimization with bounds when strict complementarity does not hold, SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis, 1991, 28: 467–695.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Lin C J and Moré J J, Newton’s method for large bound-constrained optimization problems, SIAM Journal on Optimization, 1999, 9: 1100–1127.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Ni Q, A subspace projected conjugate algorithm for large bound constrained quadratic programming, Numerical Mathematics, 1998, 7: 51–60.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Qi L, Tong X, and Li D, Active-set projected trust-region algorithm for box-constrained nonsmooth equations, Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, 2004, 120: 601–625.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Buchley A and LeNir A, QN-like variable storage conjugate gradients, Mathematical Programming, 1983, 27: 577–593.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Liu D C and Nocedal J, On the limited memory BFGS method for large scale optimization, Mathematical Programming, 1989, 45: 503–528.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Gilbert J C and Lemaréchal C, Some numerical experiments with variable storage quasi-Newton algorithms, Mathematical Programming, 1989, 45: 407–436.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Byrd R H, Nocedal J, and Schnabel R B, Representations of quasi-Newton matrices and their use in limited memory methods, Mathematical Programming, 1994, 63: 129–156.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Ni Q and Yuan Y X, A subspace limited memory quasi-Newton algorithm for large-scale nonlinear bound consrtained optimization, Mathematics of Computation, 1997, 66: 1509–1520.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. Ryrd R H, Lu P H, Nocedal J, and Zhu C Y, A limited memory algorithm for bound constrained optimization, SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing, 1995, 16: 1190–1208.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  24. Xiao Y and Li D, An active set limited memory BFGS algorithm for large-scale bound constrained optimization, Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, 2008, 67: 443–454.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. Yuan G, Wei Z, and Wu Y, Modified limited memory BFGS method with nonmonotone line search for unconstrained optimization, Journal of the Korean Mathematical Society, 2010, 47: 767–788.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  26. Byrd R H, Lu P H, Nocedal J, and Zhu C, A limited memory algorithm for bound constrained optimization, SIAM Journal on Scientific and Statistical Computing, 1995, 16: 1190–1208.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  27. Powell M J D, A fast algorithm for nonlinear constrained optimization calculations, Numer. Anal., 1978, 144–157.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  28. Kanzow C, An Active-Set Type Newton Method for Constrained Nonlinear Equations, Complementarity: Applications, Algorithms, and Extensions, Edited by Ferris M C, Mangasarian O L, and Pang J S, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dondrecht, Holland, 2001.

  29. Conn A R, Gould N I M, and Toint Ph L, CUTE: constrained and unconstrained testing environment, ACM Transactions on Mathematical Software, 1995, 21: 123–160.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  30. Dolan E D and Moré J J, Benchmarking optimization software with performance profiles, Mathematical Programming, 2002, 91: 201–213.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gonglin Yuan.

Additional information

This research was supported by Guangxi Natural Science Foundation under Grant Nos. 2012GXNSFAA053002 and 2012GXNSFAA053013, and the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant Nos. 11261006, 11161003, 71101033, and 71001015.

This paper was recommended for publication by Editor DAI Yuhong.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yuan, G., Wei, Z. & Zhang, M. An active-set projected trust region algorithm for box constrained optimization problems. J Syst Sci Complex 28, 1128–1147 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11424-014-2199-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11424-014-2199-5

Keywords

Navigation