Skip to main content
Log in

Construction and analysis of common foreign trade cycle based on MS-VAR: An empirical study of global experience

  • Published:
Journal of Systems Science and Complexity Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper proves the co-movement of foreign trade in different countries or areas which belong to ten economic regions by MS-VAR model. The studies show that trade crisis lags behind economic crisis and spreads from the core of the economic crisis to its periphery which is closely-related with it. The trade crisis corresponding to the US subprime crisis spreads faster than before, which has struck worldwide foreign trade. In order to get the main factors affecting trade crisis, the authors construct composite indices which are proxies of economic growth and price levels of internal and external regions. The results of logistic and linear panel models show that economic growth affects more to trade cycle than price level. The results of panel models with dummy variable of trade crisis show that the outside economic growth do bad to the recovery of internal foreign trade during trade crisis corresponding to Mexican peso crisis, the Asian financial crisis and the Russian debt crisis, while the opposite is true during the internet bubble burst and the US subprime crisis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Krolzig H M, Markov-Switching Vector Autoregressions: Modelling, Statistical Inference, and Application to Business Cycle Analysis, Springer, Berlin, 1997.

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Hamilton J D, A new approach to the economic analysis of nonstationary time series and the business cycle, Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 1989, 57(2): 357–384.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Krolzig H M, Business cycle measurement in the presence of structural change: International evidence, International Journal of Forecasting, 2001, 17(3): 349–368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Artis M, Krolzig H M, and Toro J, The European business cycle, Oxford Economic Papers, 2004, 56(1): 1–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Altavilla C, Do EMU members share the same business cycle?, JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 2004, 42(5): 869–896.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Altissimo F, Bassanetti A, Cristadoro R, et al., EuroCOIN: A real time coincident indicator of the euro area business cycle, CEPR Discussion Paper, 2002, No. 3108.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Diebold F X and Rudebusch G D, Measuring business cycles: A modern perspective, Review of Economics and Statistics, 1996, 78: 67–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Stock J H and Watson M W, New Indexes of Coincident and Leading Economic Indicators, MIT Press, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kose M A, Otrok C, and Whiteman C H, International business cycles: World, region, and country-specific factors, American Economic Review, 2003, 93(4): 1216–1239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Mumtaz H and Surico P, Evolving international inflation dynamics: Evidence from a time-varying dynamic factor model, Centre for Economic Policy Research Discussion Paper, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Tong D and Zhang W B, Business cycle’s synchronization in East Asia, World Economy Study, 2009 8: 82–88.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Groth A, Ghil M, Hallegatte S, et al., Evidence for genuine periodicity and deterministic caused of US business cycles, Submitted to Econometrica, 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Zhen Y L, Analysis of the fluctuations of China’s import growth: 1979–2008, International Economics and Trade Research, 2010, 2: 12–16.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Zheng G H and Zhao L, The multi-dimentional anslysis of Chinese trade cycle-the construction of multi-dimentioanal index and the application of multi-dimentional analysis method, Journal of Systems Science and Mathematical Sciences, 2011, 2: 101–114.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Ting D, The international trade shocks and the China’s business cycle, Journal of International Trade, 2006, 12: 14–19.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Lang L H and Zhang L C, The relationship between Chinese economic cycle and foreign trade cycle, Economic Perspectives, 2011, 11: 26–32.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Canova F and Dellas H, Trade interdependence and the international business cycle, Journal of International Economics, 1993, 34(1–2): 23–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Frankel J A and Rose A K, The endogeneity of the optimum currency area criteria, The Economic Journal, 1998, 108(449): 1009–1025.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Calderon C, Chong A, and Stein E, Trade intensity and business cycle synchronization: Are developing countries any different, Journal of International Economics, 2002, 71(1): 2–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Inklaar R, Jong-A-Pin R, and De Haan J, Trade and business cycle synchronization in OECD countries — A re-examination, European Economic Review, 2008, 52(4): 646–666.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Shin K and Wang Y, Trade integration and business cycle synchronization in East Asia, Asian Economic Papers, 2003, 2(3): 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Desheng Y, The exchange rate and income elasticity of China’s trade balance, World Economy Study, 2004, 11: 49–55.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Lü Y H, Influence factors of China import and export trade flows — Empirical study on trade gravity model by panal data, Economic Problems, 2009, 10: 31–33.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Ba S S, Wu B, and Zhu Y Q, Measurement of EER of RMB and its effect on international trade and forex, Studies of International Finance, 2007, 4: 57–63.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Krolzig H M and Toro J, Classical and modern business cycle measurement: The European case, Spanish Economic Review, 2005, 7(1): 1–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Bengoechea P, Camacho M, and Perez-Quiros G, A useful tool for forecasting the Euro-area business cycle phases, International Journal of Forecasting, 2006, 22(4): 735–749.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Perlin M, Ms regress — The Matlab package for Markov regime switching models, Working Paper, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lili Zhang.

Additional information

This paper was recommended for publication by Editor WANG Shouyang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhang, L., Zhang, X. & Cheng, K. Construction and analysis of common foreign trade cycle based on MS-VAR: An empirical study of global experience. J Syst Sci Complex 28, 360–380 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11424-015-3270-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11424-015-3270-6

Keywords

Navigation