Skip to main content
Log in

AUV Based Source Seeking with Estimated Gradients

  • Published:
Journal of Systems Science and Complexity Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper addresses the source seeking problems for an autonomous underwater vehicle (AUV) with the estimated gradients. The AUV is embedded with multiple sensors, which are only able to detect the signal strengths of the source with unknown distribution. To resolve this challenge, a sensor configuration is explicitly designed as a semicircle to estimate gradients of the signal field. Then, a controller is obtained via the estimated gradients to drive the AUV to approach the source. Moreover, an upper bound for the localization error is provided in terms of the radius of the semicircle and the signal distribution. Finally, the authors include a simulation example by applying the strategy to a Remote Environmental Monitoring UnitS (REMUS) for seeking the deepest point of a region of seabed in the South China Sea.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Awantha J, Raymond G G, George M, et al., AUV-Based plume tracking: A simulation study, Journal of Control Science and Engineering, 2016, (1): 1–15.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Bogue R, Underwater robots: A review of technologies and applications, Industrial Robot: An International Journal, 2015, 42(3): 186–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Paull L, Saeedi S, Seto M, et al., AUV navigation and localization: A review, IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering, 2014, 39(1): 131–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Atanasov N A, Ny J L, and Pappas G J, Distributed algorithms for stochastic source seeking with mobile robot networks: Technical report, Journal of Dynamic Systems Measurement and Control, 2015, 137(3): 031004–1–031004–9.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ashanie G and Andrey V S, Environmental monitoring using autonomous vehicles: A survey of recent searching techniques, Proceedings of the 36th Chinese Control Conference, Dalian, 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hadi H, Daniel M, and MAni H, Information theoretic source seeking strategies for multi-agent plume tracking in turbulent fields, Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 2017, 5(1): 3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Li Z, You K Y, and Song S J, Distributed vector optimization design for multi-AUV systems, Proceedings of the 36th Chinese Control Conference, Dalian, 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Lewis A S and Overton M L, Nonsmooth optimization via quasi-Newton methods, Mathematical Programming, 2013, 141(1–2): 135–163.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Sato H and Iwai T, A new, globally convergent Riemannian conjugate gradient method, Optimization, 2015, 64(4): 1011–1031.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Abbo K K and Hussein N K, A new parameterized conjugate gradient method based on generalized Perry conjugate gradient method, Tikrit Journal of Pure Science, 2016, 21(1): 102–106.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Mahyar H, Santiago P, and Victor M P, Prediction-correction interior-point method for timevarying convex optimization, IEEE Trans. Automatic Control, 2017, DOI: 10.1109/TAC.2017. 2760256.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Attouch H, Goudou X, and Redont P, The heavy ball with friction method, I. The continuous dynamical system: Global exploration of the local minima of a real-valued function by asymptotic analysis of a dissipative dynamical system, Communications in Contemporary Mathematics, 2000, 2(1): 1–34.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Alvarez F, Attouch H, Bolte J, et al., A second-order gradient-like dissipative dynamical system with Hessian-driven damping: Application to optimization and mechanics, Journal de Mathmatiques Pures et Appliques, 2002, 81(8): 747–779.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Rosero E and Werner H, Cooperative source seeking via gradient estimation and formation control (Part 1), Proceedings of the 10th UKACC International Conference on. IEEE, Loughborough, 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Frihauf P, Liu S J, and Krstic M, A single forward-velocity control signal for stochastic source seeking with multiple nonholonomic vehicles, Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement, and Control, 2014, 136(5): 051024–1–051024–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Lin J B, Song S J, You K Y, et al., Stochastic source seeking with forward and angular velocity regulation, Automatica, 2017, 83: 378–386.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Brin-Arranz L, Schenato L, and Seuret A, Distributed source Seeking via a circular formation of agents under communication constraints, IEEE Trans. on Control of Network Systems, 2016, 3(2): 104–115.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Arranz L B, Seuret A, and De Wit C C, Translation control of a fleet circular formation of AUVs under finite communication range, Proceedings of the 48th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control and the 28th Chinese Control Conference, Shanghai, 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Hassanein O, Anavatti S G, and Ray T, Fuzzy modeling and control for autonomous underwater vehicle, Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Automation, Robotics and Applications, 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Elmokadem T, Zribi M, and Youcef-Toumi K, Trajectory tracking sliding mode control of underactuated AUVs, Nonlinear Dynamics, 2016, 84(2): 1079–1091.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Sahu B K and Subudhi B, Adaptive tracking control of an autonomous underwater vehicle, International Journal of Automation and Computing, 2014, 11(3): 299–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Cervantes J, YuW, Salazar S, et al., Output based backstepping control for trajectory tracking of an autonomous underwater vehicle, Proceedings of American Control Conference, Boston, 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Fossen T I, Handbook of Marine Craft Hydrodynamics and Motion Control, John Wiley & Sons, Noida, 2011.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  24. Moore B J and Canudas-De-Wit C, Source seeking via collaborative measurements by a circular formation of agents, Proceedings of American Control Conference, Baltimore, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Deng Z H and Hong Y G, Multi-agent optimization design for autonomous Lagrangian systems, Unmanned Systems, 2016, 4(1): 5–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Mark A M, Shelley M B, Chris V A, et al., Remote environmental monitoring units: An autonomous vehicle for characterizing coastal environments, Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology, 2005, 22(11): 1797–1808.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Guo B J, Motion control of mini underwater robots, Master’s degree thesis, Harbin Engineering University, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zhuo Li.

Additional information

This research was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China under Grant No. 2016YFC0300801, the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grants Nos. 41576101 and 41427806.

This paper was recommended for publication by Guest Editor XIN Bin.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, Z., You, K. & Song, S. AUV Based Source Seeking with Estimated Gradients. J Syst Sci Complex 31, 262–275 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11424-018-7373-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11424-018-7373-8

Keywords