Abstract
Climate policies making are strongly impacted by the approach of damage evaluation. China is leading carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions in the world, and has agreed with Paris agreement to reduce CO2 emissions. China is also expected to be negatively impacted by climate change. One of main concerns is how to assess and monetize the climate damage from country-specific level. This paper builds a model comprising two approaches of damage evaluation and assesses China’s mitigation and adaptation responses by 2100 for both of no policy and Paris agreement policy. It has the following findings: First, the emissions pathway and nonfossil fuel consumption share of total energy consumption differs slightly between the two approaches of damage evaluation. Second, with the Burkes approach, the climate damage avoided by adaptation is increasingly higher than that by mitigation when investment in adaptation starts to be massively injected with faster increasing trend by 2045. Third, climate expenses should be invested more to address higher level of the climate damage evaluated by the Burkes approach than by the Mannes approach. Fourth, the main findings in this paper are robust in terms of uncertainties in the parameters of damage function.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Tang B and Gao J Z, System simulation and reliability assessment of Chinese carbon sequestration market, Journal of Systems Science and Complexity, 2014, 27(4): 760–776.
Pachauri R K, Allen M R, Barros V R, et al, Climate change 2014: Synthesis report, Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, IPCC, 2014.
Jiang X M, Liu Y F, Zhang J, et al., Evaluating the role of international trade in the growth of China’s CO2 emissions, Journal of Systems Science and Complexity, 2015, 28(4): 907–924.
Li Z R, Qiao H, Song N, et al., An empirical investigation on the risk-return relationship of carbon future market, Journal of Systems Science and Complexity, 2016, 29(4): 1057–1070.
Simon D H and Prince J T, The effect of competition on toxic pollution releases, Journal of Environmental Economics & Management, 2016, 79: 40–54.
Freeman M C and Groom B, How certain are we about the certainty-equivalent long term social discount rate?, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 2016, 79: 152–168.
Marchiori C, Dietz S, and Tavoni A, Domestic politics and the formation of international environmental agreements, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 2017, 81: 115–131.
Nordhaus W D, Rolling the DICE: An optimal transition path for controlling greenhouse gases, Resource and Energy Economics, 1993, 15(1): 27–50.
Manne A, Mendelsohn R, and Richels R, MERGE: A model for evaluating regional and global effects of GHG reduction policies, Energy Policy, 1995, 23(1): 17–34.
van der Zwaan B C C, Gerlagh R, and Schrattenholzer L, Endogenous technological change in climate change modelling, Energy Economics, 2002, 24(1): 1–19.
Bosetti V, Carraro C, Galeotti M, et al., A world induced technical change hybrid model, The Energy Journal, 2006, Special Issue: 13–38.
Duan H B, Zhu L, and Fan Y, Optimal carbon taxes in carbon-constrained China: A logistic-induced energy economic hybrid model, Energy, 2014, 69: 345–356.
Duan H B, Fan Y, and Zhu L, Modelling the evolutionary paths of multiple carbon-free energy technologies with policy incentives, Environmental Modeling & Assessment, 2015, 20(1): 55–69.
Schlenker W and Roberts M J, Nonlinear temperature effects indicate severe damages to US crop yields under climate change, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2009, 10637): 15594–15598.
Zivin J and Neidell M, Temperature and the allocation of time: Implications for climate change, Journal of Labor Economics, 2014, 32(1): 1–26.
Onozuka D and Hagihara A, Variation in vulnerability to extreme-temperature-related mortality in Japan: A 40-year time-series analysis, Environmental Research, 2015, 140: 177–184.
Burke M, Hsiang S M, and Miguel E, Global non-linear effect of temperature on economic production, Nature, 2015, 527(7577): 235–239.
Emmerling J and Tavoni M, Regional Climates, Impacts, and strategic SRM, 2016, Working paper. Retrieve from {rshttps://xueshu.glgoo.org url }/scholar?q=Regional +Climates.
National Development and Reform Commission (NDRC), China’s Policies and Actions on Climate Change, 2016. Retrieved from http://www.sdpc.gov.cn/gzdt/201611/W020161102610470866966.pdf (in Chinese).
De Bruin K C, Dellink R B, and Tol R S J, AD-DICE: An implementation of adaptation in the DICE model, Climatic Change, 2009, 95(1): 63–81.
Bosello F, Carraro C, and De Cian E, An analysis of adaptation as a response to climate change, University Ca'Foscari of Venice, Department of Economics Research Paper Series, 2009, 26_09. Retrieved from https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1513286/.
Li A and Lin B, Comparing climate policies to reduce carbon emissions in China, Energy Policy, 2013, 60: 667–674.
Nordhaus W D and Boyer J G, Warming the World: The Economics of the Greenhouse Effect, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 2000.
National Bureau of Statistics (NBS), Chinese Statistical Yearbook 2011. China Statistics Press, Beijing, 2012a. Retrieved from http://www.stats.gov.cn/tjsj/ndsj/2012/indexch.htm (in Chinese).
BP, Statistical Review of World Energy, London, 2013. Access at: www.bp.com/statisticalreview (in Chinese).
National Bureau of Statistics (NBS), Chinese Energy Statistical Yearbook 2011, China Statistics Press, Beijing, 2012b. Retrieved from http://tongji.cnki.net/kns55/Navi/YearBook. aspx?id=N2013020081&floor=1/ (in Chinese).
State Electricity Regulatory Commission (SERC), Annual Report of China Power Regulation 2011, Beijing, 2012. Retrieved from http://www.gov.cn/gzdt/2012-06/27/content_2171508.htm (in Chinese).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant Nos. 71673019, 71503242, 71273253, 71210005, 71690245.
This paper was recommended for publication by Editor YANG Cuihong.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Peng, P., Ren, X., Zhu, L. et al. A Comparison of Two Approaches for Damage Evaluation on Optimal Mitigation and Adaptation Responses in China. J Syst Sci Complex 32, 1641–1658 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11424-019-7122-7
Received:
Revised:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11424-019-7122-7