Skip to main content
Log in

New Moment Estimators of the Effective Spread Based on Daily High and Low Prices

  • Published:
Journal of Systems Science and Complexity Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper proposes five new simple moment estimators of the effective spread based on the covariance estimator of Roll (1984) and the High-Low estimator recently developed by Corwin and Schultz (2012). And then the authors theoretically investigate the statistical properties of six simple High-Low spread estimators including Corwin and Schultz’s estimator. The biases and mean squared errors (MSE) of these six estimators have been derived and compared with each other asymptotically, which, together with the subsequent simulation study, reveal explicitly the superior performance of newly developed High-Low estimators over Corwin and Schultz’s estimator in both ideal and non-ideal conditions. Moreover, this paper also develops GMM estimators constructed by three or more moment conditions and compares with the six simple High-Low estimators. Finally, several example applications on the U.S. and Chinese financial markets are conducted to demonstrate the superior performance of the new High-Low estimators. The results provide alternative choices for identifying the liquidity proxies that well capture different structure of markets

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kyle A S, Continuous auctions and insider trading, Econometrica, 1985, 53(6): 1315–1335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Petersen M A and Fialkowski D, Posted versus effective spreads: good prices or bad quotes? Journal of Financial Economics, 1994, 35(3): 269–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Goyenko R Y, Holden C W, and Trzcinka C A, Do liquidity measures measure liquidity, Journal of financial Economics, 2009, 92(2): 153–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Marshall B R, Nguyen N H, and Visaltanachoti N, Commodity liquidity measurement and transaction costs, Review of Financial Studies, 2012, 25(2): 599–638.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Karnaukh N, Ranaldo A, and Soderlind P, Understanding FX liquidity, Review of Financial Studies, 2015, 28(11): 3073–3108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Schestag R, Schuster P, and Uhrig-Homburg M, Measuring liquidity in bond markets, Review of Financial Studies, 2016, 29(5): 1170–1219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Fong K Y L, Holden C W, and Trzcinka C A, What are the best liquidity proxies for global research? Review of Finance, 2017, 21(4): 1355–1401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Ben-Rephael A, Kadan O, and Wohl A, The diminishing liquidity premium, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 2015, 50(1-2): 197–229.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Amihud Y, Hameed A, Kang W, et al., The illiquidity premium: International evidence, Journal of Financial Economics, 2015, 117(2): 350–368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Roll R, A simple implicit measure of the effective bid-ask spread in an efficient market, The Journal of Finance, 1984, 39(4): 1127–1139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Choi J Y, Salandro D, and Shastri K, On the estimation of bid-ask spreads: Theory and evidence, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 1988, 23(2): 219–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Hasbrouck J, Liquidity in the futures pits: Inferring market dynamics from incomplete data, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 2004, 39(2): 305–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Hasbrouck J, Trading costs and returns for US equities: Estimating effective costs from daily data, The Journal of Finance, 2009, 64(3): 1445–1477.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Glosten L R and Harris L E, Estimating the components of the bid and ask spread, Journal of financial Economics, 1988, 21(1): 123–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Madhavan A, Richardson M, and Roomans M, Why do security prices change? A transaction-level analysis of NYSE stocks, The Review of Financial Studies, 1997, 10(4): 1035–1064.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Huang R D and Stoll H R, The components of the bid-ask spread: A general approach, Review of Financial Studies, 1997, 10(4): 995–1034.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Lesmond D A, Ogden J P, and Trzcinka C A, A new estimate of transaction costs, Review of Financial Studies, 1999, 12(5): 1113–1141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Holden C W, New low-frequency spread measures, Journal of Financial Markets, 2009, 12(4): 778–813.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Corwin S A and Schultz P, A simple way to estimate bid-ask spreads from daily high and low prices, The Journal of Finance, 2012, 67(2): 719–760.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Gallant A, Hsu R C, and Tauchen G, Using daily data to calibrate volatility diffusions and extract the forward integrated variance, Review of Economics and Statistics, 1999, 81(4): 617–631.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Alizadeh S, Brandt M W, and Diebold F X, Range-based estimation of stochastic volatility models, The Journal of Finance, 2002, 57(3): 1047–1091.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Feller W, The asymptotic distribution of the range of sums of independent random variables, Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 1951, 22(3): 427–432.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  23. Parkinson M, The extreme value method for estimating the variance of the rate of return, Journal of Business, 1980, 53(1): 61–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Han S and Zhou H, Nondefault bond spread and market trading liquidity, Technical report, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Pu X, Liquidity commonality across the bond and CDS markets, The Journal of Fixed Income, 2009, 19(1): 26–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Hong G and Warga A, An empirical study of bond market transactions, Financial Analysts Journal, 2000, 56(2): 32–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Chakravarty S and Sarkar A, Trading costs in three US bond markets, The Journal of Fixed Income, 2003, 13(1): 39–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Dick-Nielsen J, Feldhtter P, and Lando D, Corporate bond liquidity before and after the onset of the subprime crisis, Journal of Financial Economics, 2012, 103(3): 471–492.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Schultz P, Corporate bond trading costs: A peek behind the curtain, The Journal of Finance, 2001, 56(2): 677–698.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yang Gao.

Additional information

This research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant Nos. 61603010, 61603011, 61773029, and Beijing Social Science Research Base Foundation under Grant No. 17JDGLB018.

This paper was recommended for publication by Editor SUN Liuquan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gao, Y., Wang, M. & Wang, Y. New Moment Estimators of the Effective Spread Based on Daily High and Low Prices. J Syst Sci Complex 32, 1693–1726 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11424-019-7364-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11424-019-7364-4

Keywords

Navigation