Skip to main content
Log in

Order Execution Probability and Order Queue in Limit Order Markets

  • Published:
Journal of Systems Science and Complexity Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The shaping of a limit order book illustrates the dynamics of the trading process, the changing pattern of the execution probability of limit orders therefore plays an important role. This paper presents a computable execution probability model for limit order market, as well as a numerical example that intuitively characterizes the changing pattern of the execution probability. The common effects of the lengths of both buy and sell queues on the execution probability are explored. In the limit book, the cumulative probability of limit orders is introduced as a crucial index of market depth to describe the shaping process which brings new insights into the structure of the order placement decision.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cohen K J, Maier S F, and Whitcomb S D K, Transaction costs, order placement strategy, and existence of the bid-ask spread, Journal of Political Economy, 1981, 89(2): 287–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Harris L, Optimal order submission strategies in some stylized trading problems, Financial Markets, Institutions and Instruments, 1998, 7 (2): 1–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Parlour C, Price dynamics in limit order markets, Review of Financial Studies, 1998, 11: 789–816.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Seppi D, Liquidity provision with limit orders and a strategic specialist, Review of Financial Studies, 1997, 10: 103–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Biais B, Martimort D, and Rochet J C, Competing mechanisms in a common value environment, Econometrica, 2000, 68: 799–837.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Foucault T, Kadan O, and Kandel E, The limit order book as a market for liquidity, Review of Financial Studies, 2005, 18: 1171–1217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Goettler R, Parlour C, and Rajan U, Equilibrium in a dynamic limit order market, Journal of Finance, 2005, 60: 2149–2192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Goettler R, Parlour C, and Rajan U, Informed traders and limit order markets, Journal of Financial Economics, 2009, 93(1): 67–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Zhang Q, Liu S, and Qiu W, The effects of market depth on the arrival rate of orders, Journal of Systems Science & Complexity, 2014, 27(6): 1192–1203.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Cont R, Statistical modeling of high-frequency financial data, IEEE Signal Processing, 2011, 28(5): 16–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Cont R and Kukanov A, Optimal order placement in limit order markets, Quantitative Finance, 2017, 17(1): 21–39.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Baron M, Brogaard J, Hagstromer B, et al., Risk and return in high-frequency trading, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 2019, 54(3): 993–1024.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Brogaard J and Garriott Corey, High-frequency trading competition, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 2019, 54(4): 1469–1497.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Ranaldo A, Order aggressiveness in limit order book markets, Journal of Financial Markets, 2004, 7: 53–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Ahn H, Bae K, and Chan K, Limit orders, depth and volatility: Evidence from the stock exchange of Hong Kong, Journal of Finance, 2001, 56: 767–788.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Griffiths M, Smith B, Turnball A, et al., The costs and determinants of order aggressiveness, Journal of Financial Economics, 2000, 56: 65–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Hollifield B, Miller R, and Sandas P, Empirical analysis of limit order markets, Review of Economic Studies, 2004, 71: 1027–1063.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Hollifield B, Miller R, Sandas P, et al., Estimating the gains from trade in limit order markets, Journal of Finance, 2006, 16: 2753–2804.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Battalio R H, Corwin S A, and Jennings R H, Can brokers have it all? On the relation between make-take fees and limit order execution quality. Working paper, 2015, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2367462.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Bouchaud J P, Farmer D, and Lillo F, How markets slowly digest changes in supply and demand, In Handbook of Financial Markets: Dynamics and Evolution, edited by Hens Th, Schenk-Hoppe K, 2009, 57–160.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  21. Smith E, Farmer J D, Gillemot L, et al., Statistical theory of the continuous double auction, Quantitative Finance, 2003, 3(6): 481–514.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Bovier A, Cerny J, and Hryniv O, The opinion game: Stock price evolution from microscopic market modeling, Int. J. Theor. Appl. Finance, 2006, 9: 91–111.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. Luckock H, A steady-state model of the continuous double auction, Quantitative Finance, 2003, 3: 385–404.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. Maslov S and Mills M, Price fluctuations from the order book perspective - Empirical facts and a simple model, Physica A, 2001, 299: 234–246.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. Cont R, Stoivko S, and Talreja R, A stochastic model for order book dynamics, Operations Research, 2010, 58(3): 549–563.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  26. Cont R and Adrien D L, Price dynamics in a Markovian limit order market, SIAM Journal on Financial Mathematics, 2013, 4(1): 1–25.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  27. Omura K, Tanigawa Y, and Uno J, Execution probability of limit orders on the Tokyo stock exchange, Working Paper of Waseda University, From SRRN, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Predoiu S, Gennady S, and Steven S, Optimal execution in a general one-sided limit-order book, SIAM Journal on Financial Mathematics, 2011, 2(1): 183–212.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  29. Obizhaeva A A and Jiang W, Optimal trading strategy and supply/demand dynamics, Journal of Financial Markets, 2012, 16(1): 1–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Gueant O and Lehalle C A, General intensity shapes in optimal liquidation, Mathematical Finance, 2015, 25(3): 457–495.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  31. Guilbaud F and Pham H, Optimal high frequency trading in a pro-rata microstructure with predictive information, Mathematical Finance, 2015, 25(3): 545–575

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  32. Guo X, de Larrard A, and Ruan Z, Optimal placement in a limit order book, Mathematics and Financial Economics, 2017, 11: 189–213.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  33. Rosu I, Dynamic model of the limit order book, Review of Financial Studies, 2009, 22: 4601–4641.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Rosu I, Liquidity and information in order driven markets, Working Paper, HEC Pairs, 2019, https://ssrn.com/abstract=1286193.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Handa P and Schwartz R A, Limit order trading, Journal of Finance, 1996, 51: 1835–1861.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shancun Liu.

Additional information

This research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant Nos. 71371024 and 71771008, the Funds for the First-Class Discipline Construction under Grant No. XK1802-5, and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central University under Grant Nos. PTRW1808 and YWF-19-BJ-W-45.

This paper was recommended for publication by Editor WANG Shouyang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhang, Q., Wang, C., Liu, S. et al. Order Execution Probability and Order Queue in Limit Order Markets. J Syst Sci Complex 33, 1545–1557 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11424-020-9100-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11424-020-9100-5

Keywords

Navigation