Skip to main content
Log in

Projective Group Consensus of Multi-Agent Systems with Arbitrary Parameter

  • Published:
Journal of Systems Science and Complexity Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, the projective group consensus issue for second order multi-agent systems (MASs) in directed graphs with a dynamic leader is investigated. The proposed projective group consensus with arbitrary parameter includes traditional consensus, reverse group consensus and cluster consensus as its special cases. Novel distributed control protocols are designed to obtain projective group consensus without analyzing signed directed graph as in most current literatures on bipartite consensus problem. On the basis of Lyapunov stability property, algebraic graph and some necessary matrix theory, sufficient conditions for delay and delay-free cases are derived. Finally, simulations of nonlinear chaotic MASs are adopted to testify the theoretical results.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lorenzini D and Tucker T J, The equations and the method of Chabauty-Coleman, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 2008, 53(8): 1804–1816.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Zhao X D, Liu W H, and Yang C J, Coordination control for a class of multi-agent systems under asynchronous awitching, Journal of Systems Science and Complexity, 2019, 32(4): 1019–1038.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Zhu W, Wang D D, and Zhou Q H, Leader-following consensus of multi-agent systems via adaptive event-based control, Journal of Systems Science and Complexity, 2019, 32(3): 846–856.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Porfiri M, Roberson D G, and Stilwell D J, Tracking and formation control of multiple autonomous agents: A two-level consensus approach, Automatica, 2007, 43(8): 1318–1328.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Wang F Y, Liu Z X, and Chen Z Q, Leader-following consensus of second-order nonlinear multiagent systems with intermittent position measurements, Science China Information Sciences, 2019, 62(10): 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Wang F Y, Liu Z X, and Chen Z Q, Leader-following consensus of switched multi-agent systems with general second-order dynamics, Chinese Automation Congress (CAC), Jinan, China, 2017, 743–747.

  7. Wang F Y, Liu Z X, and Chen Z Q, A novel leader-following consensus of multi-agent systems with smart leader, International Journal of Control, Automation and Systems, 2018, 16(4): 1483–1492.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Han Y J, Lu W L, and Chen T P, Achieving cluster consensus in continuous-time networks of multi-agents with inter-cluster non-identical inputs, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 2015, 60(3): 793–798.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Xie D M, Liu Q L, and Lü L F, Necessary and sufficient condition for the group consensus of multiagent systems, Appl. Math. Comput., 2014, 243: 870–878.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Hou W Y, Fu M Y, Zhang H S, et al., Consensus conditions for general second order multiagent systems with communication delay, Automatica, 2017, 75: 293–298.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Yu J Y and Wang L, Group consensus in multi-agent systems with switching topologies and communication delays, Systems Control Letters, 2010, 59(6): 340–348.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Shang Y L, Finite-time consensus for multi-agent systems with fixed topologies, International Journal of Systems Science, 2012, 43(3): 499–506.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Qin J H, Zheng W X, and Gao H J, Consensus of multiple second-order vehicles with a time-varying reference signal under directed topology, Automatica, 2011, 47(9): 1983–1991.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Altafini C, Consensus problems on networks with antagonistic interactions, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 2013, 58(4): 935–946.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Zuo Z Q, Ma J J, and Wang Y J, Layered event-triggered control for group consensus with both competition and cooperation interconnections, Neurocomputing, 2018, 275: 1964–1972.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Wen G H, Wang H, Yu X H, et al., Bipartite tracking consensus of linear multiagent systems with adynamic leader, IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems II: Express Briefs, 2018, 65(9): 1204–1208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Zhang H W and Jie C, Bipartite consensus of linear multi-agent systems over signed digraphs: An output feedback control approach, Invent. Math. IFAC Proceedings Volumes, 2014, 47(3): 4681–4686.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Hou W, Fu M Y, and Zhang H, Consensus ability of linear multi-agent systems with time delay, International Journal of Robust and Nonlinear Control, 2016, 26(12): 2529–2541.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  19. Oyedeji M O and Mahmoud M S, Couple-group consensus conditions for general first-order multiagent systems with communication delays, Systems Control Letters, 2018, 117: 37–44.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. Jadbabaie A, Lin J, and Morse A, Coordination of groups of mobile agents using nearest neighbor rules, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 2003, 48(6): 998–1001.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  21. Jiang H B, Zhang L P, and Guo S G, Cluster anti-consensus in directed networks of multi-agents based on the Q-theory, Journal of the Franklin Institute, 2014, 351(10): 4802–4816.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  22. Zhang L P and Jiang H B, Impulsive cluster anti-consensus of discrete multiagent linear dynamic systems, Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society, 2012, 2012: 726–737.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Hu J P and Hong Y G, Leader-following coordination of multi-agent systems with coupling time delays, Phys. A, 2007, 374: 853–863.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Zhang B, Lan J, and Xu S, Stability analysis of distributed delay neural networks based on relaxed Lyapunov-Krasovskii functionals, IEEE Trans. Neural Netw. Learn Syst., 2015, 26: 1480–1492.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  25. Zhou J and Chen T P, Synchronization in general complex delayed dynamical networks, IEEE Tran. Circuits Syst. I, 2006, 53(3): 733–744.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  26. Hu J P and Hong Y G, Leader-following coordination of multi-agent systems with coupling time delays, Physica A, 2007, 374: 853–863.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Liuxiao Guo.

Additional information

This research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant Nos. 61807016 and 61772013, the Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province under Grant Nos. BK20181342 and BK20171142.

This paper was recommended for publication by Editor LIU Guoping.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chen, L., Guo, L. & Yang, Y. Projective Group Consensus of Multi-Agent Systems with Arbitrary Parameter. J Syst Sci Complex 34, 618–631 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11424-020-9137-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11424-020-9137-5

Keywords

Navigation