Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Measuring Environmental Performance of Provincial Thermal Power Plants in China: A Malmquist DEA Approach with Fixed-Sum Undesirable Outputs

  • Published:
Journal of Systems Science and Complexity Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

With the development of China’s economy, environmental pollution has become cumulatively serious. The primary source of environmental pollution is thermal power generation, which has attracted the attention of governments and academia in recent years. To effectively reduce environmental pollution, research should study how to constrain the undesirable output of thermal power plants, that is, to limit the total undesirable output of the plants to a certain fixed sum. However, few studies have suggested that these undesirable outputs should be fixed-sum outputs. Moreover, no previous research publication about thermal power plants has analyzed their environmental performance changes. To address these gaps, a novel Malmquist-DEA approach is proposed for evaluate the environmental performance of thermal power plants in this paper. This approach generalizes the equilibrium efficient frontier DEA model with fixed-sum undesirable outputs and incorporates the model into the Malmquist productivity index (MPI). The authors apply this approach to the analysis of provincial thermal power plant environmental performance in China and analyze such plants’ trends based on panel data from 2011 to 2014. The empirical research shows that the environmental performance of regional thermal power plants was positively affected by efficiency change and negatively affected by technical change. Finally, the authors provide policy suggestions based on our findings.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Wang K, Yu S, and Zhang W, China’s regional energy and environmental efficiency: A DEA window analysis based dynamic evaluation, Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 2013, 58(5–6): 1117–1127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Wu J, Zhu Q Y, Chu J F, et al., Two-stage network structures with undesirable intermediate outputs reused: A DEA based approach, Computational Economics, 2015, 46(3): 455–477.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Wu J, Zhu Q Y, Yin P Z, et al., Measuring energy and environmental performance for regions in China by using dea-based malmquist indices, Operational Research, 2017, 17(3): 715–735.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Wu J, Zhu Q Y, and Liang L, CO2 emissions and energy intensity reduction allocation over provincial industrial sectors in China, Applied Energy, 2016, 166: 282–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Liu X, Zhu Q Y, Chu J F, et al., Environmental performance and benchmarking information for coal-fired power plants in China: A DEA approach, Computational Economics, 2019, 54(4): 1287–1302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Song M L, Zheng W P, and Wang S H, Measuring green technology progress in large-scale thermoelectric enterprises based on Malmquist-Luenberger life cycle assessment, Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 2017, 122: 261–269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Wu J, Xia P P, Zhu Q Y, et al., Measuring environmental efficiency of thermoelectric power plants: A common equilibrium efficient frontier DEA approach with fixed-sum undesirable output, Annals of Operations Research, 2019, 275(2): 731–749.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Charnes A, Cooper W W, and Rhodes E, Measuring the efficiency of decision making units, European Journal of Operational Research, 1978, 2(6): 429–444.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Cook W D and Seiford L M, Data envelopment analysis (DEA)-thirty years on, European Journal of Operational Research, 2009, 192(1): 1–17.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. An Q X, Wang Z R, Emrouznejad A, et al., Efficiency evaluation of parallel interdependent processes systems: An application to Chinese 985 project universities, International Journal of Production Research, 2019, 57(17): 5387–5399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Li F, Zhu Q Y, and Chen Z, Allocating a fixed cost across the decision making units with two-stage network structures, Omega, 2019, 83: 139–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Lozano S, Villa G, and Eguía I, Data envelopment analysis with multiple modes of functioning. application to reconfigurable manufacturing systems, International Journal of Production Research, 2017, 55(24): 7566–7583.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Wang C H and Chien Y W, Combining balanced scorecard with data envelopment analysis to conduct performance diagnosis for taiwanese led manufacturers, International Journal of Production Research, 2016, 54(17): 5169–5181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. An Q X, Chen H X, Wu J, et al., Measuring slacks-based efficiency for commercial banks in china by using a two-stage dea model with undesirable output, Annals of Operations Research, 2015, 235(1): 13–35.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Kong W H, Fu T T, and Yu M M, Evaluating taiwanese bank efficiency using the two-stage range dea model, International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making, 2017 16(4): 1043–1068.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Wang K, Huang W, Wu J, et al., Efficiency measures of the Chinese commercial banking system using an additive two-stage DEA, Omega, 2014, 44: 5–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Emrouznejad A and Yang G L, A survey and analysis of the first 40 years of scholarly literature in DEA: 1978–2016, Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 2018, 61: 4–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Shang J K, Hung W T, Lo C T, et al., Ecommerce and hotel performance: Three-stage dea analysis, The Service Industries Journal, 2008, 28(4): 529–540.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Wu J, Lu X, Guo D, et al., Slacks-based efficiency measurements with undeirable outputs in data envelopment analysis, International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making, 2017, 16(4): 1005–1021.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Xie Q W, Hu P, Jiang A, et al., Carbon emissions allocation based on satisfaction perspective and data envelopment analysis, Energy Policy, 2019, 132: 254–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Gu W, Basu M, Chao Z, et al., A unified framework for credit evaluation for internet finance companies: Multi-criteria analysis through AHP and DEA, International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making, 2017, 16(3): 597–624.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Krmac E and Djordjević B, A multi-criteria decision-making framework for the evaluation of train control information systems, the case of ERTMS, International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making, 2019, 18(1): 209–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Färe R, Grosskopf S, Lovell C K, et al., Multilateral productivity comparisons when some outputs are undesirable: A nonparametric approach, The Review of Economics and Statistics, 1989, 71(1): 90–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Bian Y W and Yang F, Resource and environment efficiency analysis of provinces in China: A DEA approach based on shannons entropy, Energy Policy, 2010, 38(4): 1909–1917.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Dai X F and Kuosmanen T, Best-practice benchmarking using clustering methods: Application to energy regulation, Omega, 2014, 42(1): 179–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Li H and Shi J F, Energy efficiency analysis on Chinese industrial sectors: An improved super-sbm model with undesirable outputs, Journal of Cleaner Production, 2014, 65: 97–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Song M L, An Q X, Zhang W, et al., Environmental efficiency evaluation based on data envelopment analysis: A review, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2012, 16(7): 4465–4469.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Suzuki S and Nijkamp P, An evaluation of energy-environment-economic efficiency for EU, APEC and ASEAN countries: Design of a target-oriented dfm model with fixed factors in data envelopment analysis, Energy Policy, 2016, 88: 100–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Wu J, Zhu Q Y, Chu J F, et al., Measuring energy and environmental efficiency of transportation systems in China based on a parallel DEA approach, Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 2016, 48: 460–472.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Zhou P, Poh K L, and Ang B W, A non-radial DEA approach to measuring environmental performance, European Journal of Operational Research, 2007, 178(1): 1–9.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  31. Korhonen P J and Luptacik M, Eco-efficiency analysis of power plants: An extension of data envelopment analysis, European Journal of Operational Research, 2004, 154(2): 437–446.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  32. Sueyoshi T, Goto M, and Ueno T, Performance analysis of us coal-fired power plants by measuring three dea efficiencies, Energy Policy, 2010, 38(4): 1675–1688.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Sueyoshi T and Goto M, Efficiency-based rank assessment for electric power industry: A combined use of data envelopment analysis (DEA) and dea-discriminant analysis (DA), Energy Economics, 2012, 34(3): 634–644.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Song M L, Peng J, and Wu Q Q, An undesirable-output-considered super-efficiency dea model and its illustration in evaluation of thermoelectric enterprises, Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems, 2014, 27(3): 1507–1517.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  35. Wu J, Xiong B B, An Q X, et al., Measuring the performance of thermal power firms in China via fuzzy enhanced russell measure model with undesirable outputs, Journal of Cleaner Production, 2015, 102: 237–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Arabi B, Doraisamy S M, Emrouznejad A, et al., Eco-efficiency measurement and material balance principle: An application in power plants Malmquist Luenberger Index, Annals of Operations Research, 2017, 255(1–2): 221–239.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  37. Lins M P E, Gomes E G, de Mello J C C S, et al., Olympic ranking based on a zero sum gains DEA model, European Journal of Operational Research, 2003, 148(2): 312–322.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  38. Yang F, Wu D D, Liang L, et al., Competition strategy and efficiency evaluation for decision making units with fixed-sum outputs, European Journal of Operational Research, 2011, 212(3): 560–569.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  39. Yang M, Li Y J, Chen Y, et al., An equilibrium efficiency frontier data envelopment analysis approach for evaluating decision-making units with fixed-sum outputs, European Journal of Operational Research, 2014, 239(2): 479–489.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  40. Yang M, Li Y J, and Liang L, A generalized equilibrium efficient frontier data envelopment analysis approach for evaluating DMUs with fixed-sum outputs, European Journal of Operational Research, 2015, 246(1): 209–217.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  41. Fang L, A new approach for achievement of the equilibrium efficient frontier with fixed-sum outputs, Journal of the Operational Research Society, 2016, 67(3): 412–420.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Zhu Q Y, Wu J, Song M L, et al., A unique equilibrium efficient frontier with fixed-sum outputs in data envelopment analysis, Journal of the Operational Research Society, 2017, 68(12): 1483–1490.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Caves D W, Christensen L R, and Diewert W E, The economic theory of index numbers and the measurement of input, output, and productivity, Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 1982, 50(6): 1393–1414.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  44. Färe R, Grosskopf S, Norris M, et al., Productivity growth, technical progress, and efficiency change in industrialized countries, The American Economic Review, 1994, 84(1): 66–83.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Malmquist S, Index numbers and indifference surfaces, Trabajos de Estadística, 1953, 4(2): 209–242.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  46. Färe R, Grosskopf S, Lindgren B, et al., Productivity changes in swedish pharamacies 1980–1989: A non-parametric malmquist approach, Journal of Productivity Analysis, 1992, 3(1–2): 85–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Farrell M J, The measurement of productive efficiency, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A (General), 1957, 120(3): 253–281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Kao C, Malmquist productivity index based on common-weights dea: The case of Taiwan forests after reorganization, Omega, 2010, 38(6): 484–491.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Pastor J T and Lovell C K, A global malmquist productivity index, Economics Letters, 2005, 88(2): 266–271.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  50. Wang Y M and Lan Y X, Measuring malmquist productivity index: A new approach based on double frontiers data envelopment analysis, Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 2011, 54(11–12): 2760–2771.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  51. Arabi B, Munisamy S, Emrouznejad A, et al., Power industry restructuring and eco-efficiency changes: A new slacks-based model in Malmquist-Luenberger index measurement, Energy Policy, 2014, 68: 132–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Song M L and Zheng W P, Industrial energy efficiency with CO2 emissions in China: A nonparametric analysis, The Social Science Journal, 2016, 53(1): 88–99.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  53. Wu F, Fan L, Zhou P, et al., Industrial energy efficiency with CO2 emissions in China: A nonparametric analysis, Energy Policy, 2012, 49: 164–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Li F, Emrouznejad A, Yang G L, et al., Carbon emission abatement quota allocation in Chinese manufacturing industries: An integrated cooperative game data envelopment analysis approach, Journal of the Operational Research Society, 2020, 71(8): 1259–1288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Li F, Zhu Q Y, and Zhuang J, Analysis of fire protection efficiency in the United States: A two-stage dea-based approach, OR Spectrum, 2018, 40(1): 23–68.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  56. Chen C M and Delmas M A, Measuring eco-inefficiency: A new frontier approach, Operations Research, 2012, 60(5): 1064–1079.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  57. Halkos G and Natalia Petrou K, Treating undesirable outputs in DEA: A critical review, Economic Analysis and Policy, 2019, 62: 97–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Färe R and Grosskopf S, Nonparametric productivity analysis with undesirable outputs: Comment, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 2003, 85(4): 1070–1074.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Charnes A and Cooper W W, Programming with linear fractional functionals, Naval Research Logistics Quarterly, 1962, 9(3–4): 181–186.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  60. Färe R, Grosskopf S, and Pasurka Jr C A, Pollution abatement activities and traditional productivity, Ecological Economics, 2007, 62(3–4): 673–682.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Zhou P, Ang B, and Han J Y, Total factor carbon emission performance: A Malmquist index analysis, Energy Economics, 2010, 32(1): 194–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Cook W D, Liang L, Zha Y, et al., A modified super-efficiency dea model for infeasibility, Journal of the Operational Research Society, 2009, 60(2): 276–281.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Management, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, 230026, China

    Wenhui Hou, Yunwen Zheng, Liang Liang & Yongjun Li

Authors
  1. Wenhui Hou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Yunwen Zheng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Liang Liang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Yongjun Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yongjun Li.

Additional information

This paper was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant Nos. 72071192, 71671172, and the Anhui Provincial Quality Engineering Teaching and Research Project under Grant No. 2020jyxm2279, and the Anhui University and Enterprise Cooperation Practice Education Base Project under Grant No. 2019sjjd02, and Teaching and Research Project of USTC (2019xjyxm019, 2020ycjg08), and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (WK2040000027).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hou, W., Zheng, Y., Liang, L. et al. Measuring Environmental Performance of Provincial Thermal Power Plants in China: A Malmquist DEA Approach with Fixed-Sum Undesirable Outputs. J Syst Sci Complex 35, 1201–1224 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11424-022-0055-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11424-022-0055-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation