Skip to main content
Log in

An Automatic Classification Pipeline for the Complex Synaptic Structure Based on Deep Learning

  • Published:
Journal of Systems Science and Complexity Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

As a hallmark of brain complexity, synapses in the nervous system have always received extensive attentions. The diversity of the synaptic structure reflects various functions and mechanisms, some research indicates that, as one of the complex synaptic structures, multiple synapses can strengthen the synaptic connection, what’s more, it is closely associated with the procedure of memory and learning. Accompanied by the fast advancement of electron microscopy (EM) technology, it is possible to detect the composition of multiple synapse with high resolution. On this basis, there have been various meaningful studies concerning the relationship between the multiple synapse and cognitive abilities. Despite the extensive studies have been made by different researchers on multiple synapse, no attention has been paid to the classification accuracy of the type of multiple synapse. The current research puts forward an effective method for the automatic classification of multiple synapse, which should be performed in three steps, namely the segmentation of synaptic clefts, the segmentation of vesicle bands, as well as the segmentation of multiple synapses. According to experimental results based on four data sets, the mean classification rate of the method is approximately 97%. In addition, the experimental result on the public dataset shows that the accuracy can reach 96.5%. The classification results provide a basis for quantitative statistics of follow-up studies. Moreover, this automatic classification method can reduce the time in artificial statistics, and thus researchers can focus more attention on the analysis of statistical results.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Yang Y, Liu D, Huang W, et al., Selective synaptic remodeling of amygdalocortical connections associated with fear memory, Nature Neuroscience, 2016, 19(10): 1348–1355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Zhang X and Poo M, Progress in neural plasticity, Science China Life Sciences, 2010, 53(3): 322–329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Medvedev N I, Dallrac G, Popov V I, et al., Multiple spine boutons are formed after long-lasting LTP in the awake rat, Brain Structure and Function, 2014, 219(1): 407–414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Hruska M, Henderson N, Le Marchand S J, et al., Synaptic nanomodules underlie the organizationand plasticity of spine synapses, Nature Neuroscience, 2018, 21: 671–682.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Reilly J E, Hanson H H, Fernndez-Monreal M, et al., Characterization of MSB synapses in dissociated hippocampal culture with simultaneous pre- and postsynaptic live microscopy, PLoS One, 2011, 6(10): e26478.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Toni N, Buchs P A, Nikonenko I, et al., LTP promotes formation of multiple spine synapses between a single axon terminal and a dendrite, Nature Neuroscience, 1999, 402(6760): 421–425.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Nagerl U V, Kostinger G, Anderson J C, et al., Protracted synaptogenesis after activity-dependent spinogenesis in hippocampal neurons, J Neurosci, 2007, 27(30): 8149–8156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Medvedev N I, Dallrac G, Popov V I, et al., Multiple spine boutons are formed after long-lasting LTP in the awake rat, Brain Structure and Function, 2014, 219(1): 407–414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Geinisman Y, Berry R W, Disterhoft J F, et al., Associative learning elicits the formation of multiple-synapse boutons, J Neurosci, 2001, 21(15): 5568–5573.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Knott G W, Holtmaat A, Wilbrecht L, et al., Spine growth precedes synapse formation in the adult neocortex in vivo, Nature Neuroscience, 2006, 9(9): 1117–1124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Black J E, Isaacs K R, Anderson B J, et al., Learning causes synaptogenesis, whereas motor activity causes angiogenesis, in cerebellar cortex of adult rats, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 1990, 87(14): 5568–5572.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Crair M C, Gillespie D C, and Stryker M P, The role of visual experience in the development of columns in cat visual cortex, Science, 1998, 279(5350): 566–570.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kim H W, Oh S, Lee S H, et al., Different types of multiple-synapse boutons in the cerebellar cortex between physically enriched and ataxic mutant mice, Microscopy Research and Technique, 2019, 82(2): 25–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Wu L F, Xu Y W, Jian M, et al., Face liveness detection scheme with static and dynamic features, International Journal of Wavelets Multiresolution and Information Processing, 2018, 16(2): 1840001.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Jiang Y, Zhuo J Y, Zhang J, et al., The optimization of parallel convolutional RBM based on Spark, International Journal of Wavelets Multiresolution and Information Processing, 2019, 17(2): 1902001.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Cui Y, Zhang G, Liu Z, et al., A deep learning algorithm for one-step contour aware nuclei segmentation of histopathological images, Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing, 2019, 57: 2027–2043.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Xiao C, Liu J, Chen X, et al., Deep contextual residual network for electron microscopy image segmentation in connectomics, IEEE 15th International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging, 2018, 378–381.

  18. Quan T M, Hildebrand D G C, and Jeong W K, FusionNet: A deep fully residual convolutional neural network for image segmentation in connectomics. arXiv preprint, 2016, arXiv: 1612.05360.

  19. Li W F, Deng H, Rao Q, et al., An automated pipeline for mitochondrial segmentation on ATUM-SEM Stacks, Journal of Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, 2017, 15(3): 1750015.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Xiao C, Chen X, Li W F, et al., Automatic mitochondria segmentation for EM data using a 3d supervised convolutional network, Frontiers in Neuroanatomy, 2018, 12: 92, DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fnana.2018.00092.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Xie Q W, Chen X, Shen L J, et al., Brain microstructure reconstruction based on deep learning, Systems Engineering — Theory & Practice, 2018, 38(2): 482–491.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Sigdel M, Dinc I, Sigdel M S, et al. Feature analysis for classification of trace fluorescent labeled protein crystallization images, BioData Mining, 2017, 10(1): 14, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13040-017-0133-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Kaltdorf K V, Theiss M, Markert S M, et al., Automated classification of synaptic vesicles in electron tomograms of C. elegans using machine learning, PLoS One, 2018, 13(10): e0205348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Pang S, Du A, Orgun M A, et al., A novel fused convolutional neural network for biomedical image classification, Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing, 2019, 57: 107–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Zhao J, Zhang M, Zhou Z, et al., Automatic detection and classification of leukocytes using convolutional neural networks, Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing, 2017, 55: 1287–1301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Wu Z, Shen C, and Van Den Hengel A, Wider or deeper: Revisiting the resnet model for visual recognition, Pattern Recognition, 2019, 90: 119–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Szegedy C, Vanhoucke V, Ioffe S, et al., Rethinking the inception architecture for computer vision, Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2016, 2818–2826.

  28. Huang G, Liu Z, Van Der Maaten L, et al., Densely connected convolutional networks, Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2017, 4700–4708.

  29. Shan G C, Wang H Y, and Liang W, Robust encoder-decoder learning framework towards offline handwritten mathematical expression recognition based on multi-scale deep neural network, Science China: Information Sciences, 2021, 64(3): 139101.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Wang H Y and Shan G C, Recognizing handwritten mathematical expressions as LaTex sequences using a multiscale robust neural network, 2020, arXiv: 2003.00817.

  31. Luo J, Hong B, Jiang Y, et al., Automatic classification for the type of multiple synapse based on deep learning, 41st Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC), 2019, 40–43.

  32. He K M, Gkioxari G, Dollar P, et al., Mask R-CNN, arXiv preprint, 2018, arXiv: 1703.06870.

  33. Luo J, Raw picture, figshare, https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.10731641.

  34. Schmid B, Schindelin J, Cardona A, et al., A high-level 3d visualization api for java and imagej, BMC Bioinformatics, 2010, 11: 1–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Dataset sources: https://neurodata.io/data/kasthuri15/.

  36. Kasthuri N, Hayworth K J, Berger D R, et al., Saturated reconstruction of a volume of neocortex, Cell, 2015, 162(3): 648–661.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Keras: Deep learning library for theano and tensorflow, 2015, http://keras.io/.

  38. SynapseWeb, Kristen M. Harris, PI, https://synapseweb.clm.utexas.edu/em-cleft.

  39. Hong B, Liu J, Li W F, et al., Fully automatic synaptic cleft detection and segmentation from EM images based on deep learning, Advances in Brain Inspired Cognitive Systems, 2018, 64–74.

  40. Li W F, Liu J, Xiao C, et al., A fast forward 3D connection algorithm for mitochondria and synapse segmentations from serial EM images, BioData Mining, 2018, 11(1): 24, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13040-018-0183-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Walsby A E, Gas Vesicles, Microbiological Reviews, 1994, 58(1): 94–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. CREMI challenge: https://cremi.org.

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the Shanghai Institute of Neurology, they have provided excellent experimental materials.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Lijun Shen, Chao Ma, Jie Luo or Bei Hong.

Additional information

This research was supported by the Science and Technology Development Fund, Macau SAR under Grant No. 0024/2018/A1, the Research Fund of Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Joint Laboratory for Intelligent Micro-Nano Optoelectronic Technology under Grant No. 2020B1212030010, the National Science Foundation of China under Grant Nos. 61673381, 61201050, 61306070, 61701497, 11771130, 61871177, Special Program of Beijing Municipal Science & Technology Commission under Grant No. Z181100000118002, Strategic Priority Research Program of Chinese Academy of Science under Grant No. XDB32030200, and Scientific research instrument and equipment development project of Chinese Academy of Sciences under Grant No. YZ201671.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shen, L., Ma, C., Luo, J. et al. An Automatic Classification Pipeline for the Complex Synaptic Structure Based on Deep Learning. J Syst Sci Complex 35, 1398–1414 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11424-022-0307-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11424-022-0307-5

Keywords

Navigation