Skip to main content
Log in

Metamorphosis: The Credit Market of Low-Income Households in a Semi-Peripheral Country

  • Published:
Journal of Systems Science and Complexity Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, a theoretical model is developed on the basis of systems theory, which structures the livelihood system of low-income households in a European country characterized by a semi-peripheral economy. Based on the proposed model, the complex system of network connections and formal and informal financial transactions, which households use in their daily lives to cover their expenses, becomes graspable. The proposed theoretical model is analyzed through simulations based on agent-based modelling (ABM) centred on empirical network data. Through the simulations, the author explores the mechanisms of the market and asks what formal and informal credit transactions determine its operation, how these factors shape the local social structure and how resilient the market is to crises. The results show that this dynamic, complex risk-sharing system has an inherent logic and it can mitigate the small liquidity shocks but it is not resistant to bigger financial shocks or overconsumptions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Pollock F, State capitalism: Its possibilities and limitations, Critical Theory and Society, 2020, 12(2): 95–18.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Picciotto S, Regulating Global Corporate Capitalism, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2011.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  3. Zadorian A, Szanyi M, and Farazmand A, Introduction to the special issue: The rise of state capitalism, International Journal of Public Administration, 2021, 44(14): 1195–1200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Martin J P, Is it oiling or grinding the gears? NER’s corruption and economic performance in an international comparison, Társadalmi Riport 2020, Eds. by Kolosi T, Szelényi I, Tóth I G, TρRKI Budapest, 2020.

  5. Siposne N E, Evolution of the interpretation of poverty in Hungary between 2007 and 2019, Corvinus Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 2021, 12(2): 23–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Sen A, Deaton A, and Besley T, Economics with a moral compass? Welfare economics: Past, present, and future, Annual Review of Economics, 2020, 12: 1–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Németh K, Trapped in the past? The reproduction of poverty and marginality in a Hungarian manorial village, Sociologia Ruralis, 2019, 59(3): 419–446.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Guérin I, Juggling with debt, social ties, and values — The everyday use of microcredit in rural South India, Current Anthropology, 2014, 55(9): 40–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Wilkis A, The Moral Power of Money: Morality and Economy in the Life of the Poor, Stanford University Press, Stanford, 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Bouman F J A, Informal rural finance — An Aladdin’s lamp of information, Sociologia Ruralis, 1990, 30(2): 155–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Bourdieu P, The Forms of Capital, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Putnam R, Bowling Alone — The Collapse and Revival of American Community, Simon & Schuster, New York, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Narayan D, Bonds and bridges: Social capital and poverty, Policy Research Working Paper, 1999, 2: 21–67.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Portes A, Social capital: Its origins and applications in modern sociology, Annual Review of Sociology, 1998, 24: 1–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Granovetter M, The strength of weak ties, American Journal of Sociology, 1973, 78: 1360–1380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Buyandelgeriyn M, Dealing with uncertainty. Shamans, marginal capitalism, and the remaking of history in post socialist Mongolia, American Ethnologist, 2007, 1(34): 127–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Nicolis G, Introduction to Nonlinear Science, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Deacon T W, Three levels of emergent phenomena, Evolution and Emergence: Systems, Organisms, Persons, Eds. by Murphy A and Stoeger G, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Bhaskar R, A Realist Theory of Science, Harvester, New York, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Reed M and Harvey D L, Social science as the study of complex systems, Chaos Theory in the Social Sciences, Eds. by Kiel L D and Elliott E, University of Michigan Press, Michigan, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Delanda M, Intensive Science and Virtual Philosophy, Continuum, New York, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Maturana H and Varela F, Autopoiesis and Cognition: The Realization of the Living, Reidel, Boston, 1980.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  23. Cilliers P, Boundaries, hierarchies and networks in complex systems, International Journal of Innovation Management, 2001, 5(2): 134–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Morin E, Restricted Complexity, General Complexity, Science and Us: Philosophy and Complexity, World Scientific, Singapore, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Graeber D, Debt: The First Five Thousand Years, Melville House, New York, 2011.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  26. Højer L, The spirit of business: Pawnshops in Ulaanbaatar, Social Anthropology, 2012, 1(20): 34–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Chesnais F, Investment capital: Accumulation, internationalization, economic and political effects, Finance Mondialisée, 2004, 22(2): 15–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Lazzarato M, Neoliberalism, the financial crisis and the end of the liberal state, Theory, Culture & Society, 2015, 32(7–8): 67–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Campbell S, Debt collection as labour discipline: The work of finance in a Myanmar squatter settlement, Social Anthropology, 2020, 3(28): 729–742.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Byrne D and Callaghan G, Complexity Theory and the Social Sciences: The State of the Art, Routledge, Milton Park, 2013.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  31. Guseva A, Into the Red: The Birth of the Credit Card Market in Postcommunist Russia, Stanford University Press, Redwood City, 2008.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  32. Mcfall L, Devising Consumption: Cultural Economies of Insurance, Credit and Spending, Routledge, Milton Park, 2014.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  33. Deville J, Lived Economies of Default: Consumer Credit, Debt Collection, and the Capture of Affect, Routledge, Milton Park, 2015.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  34. James D, Money from Nothing: Indebtedness and Aspiration in South Africa, Stanford University Press, Redwood City, 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Polanyi K, The Great Transformation: The Political and Economic Origins of Our Time, Beacon Press, New York, 1944/2001.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Peebles G, The anthropology of credit and debt, Annual Review of Anthropology, 2010, 39: 225–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Gregory C A, Gifts and Commodities, Academic Press, London, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Smets P, Trust & Co-operation: Symbolic Exchange and Moral Economies in an Age of Cultural Differentiation, Het Spinhuis, Amsterdam, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Hotze L B, Juggling Money: Financial Self-Help Organizations and Social Security in Yogyakarta, KITLV Press, Leiden, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Carrier J, Moral economy: What’s in a name, Anthropological Theory, 2018, 1(18): 18–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Álvarez-Gamboa J, Cabrera-Barona P, and Jácome-Estrella H, Financial inclusion and multidimensional poverty in Ecuador: A spatial approach, World Development Perspectives, 2021, 22: 300–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Zelizer V A, The Social Meaning of Money: Pin Money, Paychecks, Poor Relief, and Other Currencies, Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Knight F, Risk, Uncertainty and Profit, Houghton Mifflin, Boston, 1921.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Boltanski L and Thvenot L, On justification: Economies of Worth, Princeton University Press, Princeton, 2006.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  45. Geertz C, The rotating credit association: A “Middle Rung” in development, Economic Development and Cultural Change, 1962, 10(3): 241–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Ardener S, The comparative study of rotating credit associations, The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland, 1964, 94(2): 201–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Cseh-Szombathy L, Family Sociology Problems and Methods, Gondolat, Budapest, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Nagy I, “Who is the master of the house?” — Investigating the money management habits of families and the factors affecting them in Hungary in the 1990s, Doctoral dissertation, BME, Budapest, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Collins D, Morduch J, Rutherford S, et al., Portfolios of the Poor: How the World’s Poor Live on $2 a Day, Princeton University Press, Princeton, 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Gurin I, Women and money: Lessons from Senegal, Development and Change, 2006, 37(3): 549–570.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Agabin H M, The informal credit markets in the Philippines, Asian Economic Journal, 1993, 7(2): 209–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Ruthven O, Money mosaics: Financial choice and strategy in a West Delhi squatter settlement, Journal of International Development, 2002, 14: 249–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Platteau J P and Abraham A, Credit as an insurance mechanism in the backward rural areas of less developed countries, Savings and Development, 1984, 8(2): 115–133.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Durst J, Juggling with debts, moneylenders and local petty monarchs: Banking the unbanked in ‘hanty-villages’ in Hungary, Review of Sociology, 2015, 25(4): 30–27.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Szalma I, Szél B, and Husz I, Changes in Household Savings Between 2006 and 2010, How Long Should We Stretch? Changes in the Financial Culture of Hungarian Households and Businesses During the Crisis, Eds. by Czakó A, Husz I, Szántó Z, BCE, Budapest, 2011.

  56. Gosztonyi M and Havran D, Highways to hell? Paths towards the formal financial exclusion: Empirical lessons of the households from Northern Hungary, The European Journal of Development Research, 2022, 34(3): 1573–1606.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Gosztonyi M, Jugglers of money: Story of a participatory action research in a disadvantaged community, Indian Journal of Social Work, 2017, 78(1): 75–92.

    Google Scholar 

  58. Gosztonyi M, Jugglers of money: Financial surviving strategy of low-income families and a story of a participatory action research, Doctoral dissertation, Corvinus University of Budapest, Budapest, 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  59. Finger K and Lux T, Network formation in the interbank money market: An application of the actor-oriented model, Social Networks, 2017, 1(48): 237–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Cariboni J, Gatelli D, Liska R, et al., The role of sensitivity analysis in ecological modelling, Ecological Modelling, 2007, 203(1–2): 167–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Broeke G, Van-Voorn G, and Ligtenberg A, Which sensitivity analysis method should I use for my agent-based model? Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 2016, 19(1): 5–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Meyer R and Vasey H, Immigration, social networks, and the emergence of ethnic segmentation in a low-skill labour market, Social Science Computer Review, 2018, 12(8): 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  63. Polhill G and Salt D, The importance of ontological structure: Why validation by ‘it-to-data’ is insufficient, Simulating Social Complexity Understanding Complex Systems, Eds. by Edmonds B and Meyer R, Springer, Berlin, 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  64. Watts D and Strogatz S, Collective dynamics of ‘fmall-world’ networks, Nature, 1998, 393: 440–442.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  65. Barabási A L and Albert R, Emergence of scaling in random networks, Science, 1999, 286: 509–512.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  66. Willmott C J, Matsuura K, and Robeson S M, Ambiguities inherent in sums-of-squares-based error statistics, Atmospheric Environment, 2009, 43(3): 749–552.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Carrella E, Bailey R, and Jens M, Calibrating agent-based models with linear regressions, Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 2020, 23(1): 7–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Lee J, Filatova T, Ligmann-Zielinska A, et al., The complexities of agent-based modelling output analysis, Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 2015, 4(18): 4–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Wiltshire S, Zia A, Koliba C, et al., Network meta-metrics: Using evolutionary computation to identify effective indicators of epidemiological vulnerability in a livestock production system model, Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 2019, 2(22): 8–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Walsh F, Strengthening Family Resilience, Guilford Publications, New York, 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  71. Wilensky U, Netlogo Bank Reserves Model, Center for Connected Learning and Computer-Based Modeling, Northwestern University, Chicago, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  72. Wilensky U, NetLogo Cash Flow Model, Center for Connected Learning and Computer-Based Modeling, Northwestern University, Chicago, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  73. Troutman C and Wilensky U, NetLogo Language Change Model, Centre for Connected Learning and Computer-Based Modeling, Northwestern University, Chicago, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  74. Forex I, Forex Model, Netlogo, New York, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Márton Gosztonyi.

Ethics declarations

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Additional information

This research was supported by the Hungarian National Research Fund, in the framework of the research project “Moralities of dependent relations in the era of financialisation” under Grant No. K-143543.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gosztonyi, M. Metamorphosis: The Credit Market of Low-Income Households in a Semi-Peripheral Country. J Syst Sci Complex 36, 2434–2466 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11424-023-1472-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11424-023-1472-x

Keywords

Navigation