Skip to main content
Log in

A Novel Extremum Seeking Control to Enhance Convergence and Robustness in the Presence of Nonlinear Dynamic Sensors

  • Published:
Journal of Systems Science and Complexity Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper focuses on optimizing an unknown cost function through extremum seeking (ES) control in the presence of a slow nonlinear dynamic sensor responsible for measuring the cost. In contrast to traditional perturbation-based ES control, which often suffers from sluggish convergence, the proposed method eliminates the time-scale separation between sensor dynamics and ES control by using the relative degree of the nonlinear sensor system. To improve the convergence rate, the authors incorporate high-frequency dither signals and a differentiator. To enhance the robustness with the existence of rapid disturbances, an off-the-shelf linear high-gain differentiator is applied. The first result demonstrates that, for any desired convergence rate, with properly tuned parameters for the proposed ES algorithm, the input of the cost function can converge to an arbitrarily small neighborhood of the optimal solution, starting from any initial condition within any given compact set. Furthermore, the second result shows the robustness of the proposed ES control in the presence of sufficiently fast, zero-mean periodic disturbances. Simulation results substantiate these theoretical findings.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kristic M and Wang H H, Stability of extremum seeking feedback for general nonlinear dynamic systems, Automatica, 2000, 36: 595–601.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Tan Y, Nešić D, and Mareels I, On non-local stability properties of extremum seeking control, Automatica, 2006, 42: 889–903.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Nešić D, Tan Y, Moase W H, et al., A unifying approach to extremum seeking: Adaptive schemes based on estimation of derivatives, 49th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC), Atlanta, 2010.

  4. Tan Y, Moase W H, Manzie C, et al., Extremum seeking from 1922 to 2010, Proceedings of the 29th Chinese Control Conference, Xuzhou, 2010.

  5. Dürr H, Stanković M S, Ebenbauer C, et al., Lie bracket approximation of extremum seeking systems, Automatica, 2018, 94: 151–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Grushkovskaya V, Zuyev A, and Ebenbauer C, On a class of generating vector fields for the extremum seeking problem: Lie bracket approximation and stability properties, Automatica, 2013, 49: 1538–1552.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Poveda J I and Li N, Robust hybrid zero-order optimization algorithms with acceleration via averaging in time, Automatica, 2021, 49: 109361.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Moase W H and Manzie C, Semi-global stability analysis of observer-based extremum-seeking for Hammerstein plants, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 2012, 57: 1685–1695.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Moase W H and Manzie C, Fast extremum-seeking for Wiener-Hammerstein plants, Automatica, 2012, 48: 2433–2443.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Guay M and Dochain D, A proportional-integral extremum-seeking controller design technique, Automatica, 2017, 77: 61–67.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Guay M, A perturbation-based proportional integral extremum-seeking control approach, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 2016, 61: 3370–3381.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Liu W Z, Huo X, Ma K M, et al., Performance improvement in fast extremum seeking with adaptive phase compensator and high-gain optimizer, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems, 2021, 52: 6774–6788.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Ghods N and Krstic M, Source seeking with very slow or drifting sensors, Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement, and Control, 2011, 133: 044504.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Liu W Z, Huo X, Duan G, et al., Semi-global stability analysis of source seeking with dynamic sensor reading and a class of nonlinear maps, International Journal of Control, 2022, 95: 641–650.

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Pardo A, Marco S, and Samitier J, Nonlinear inverse dynamic models of gas sensing systems based on chemical sensor arrays for quantitative measurements, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, 2021, 47: 644–651.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  16. Gammaitoni L and Bulsara A R, Noise activated nonlinear dynamic sensors, Phys. Rev. Lett., 2002, 88: 230601.

    Article  ADS  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Yu D C, Liu F, Lai P Y, et al., Nonlinear dynamic compensation of sensors using inverse-model-based neural network, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, 2008, 57: 2364–2376.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  18. Göpel W and Schierbaum K D, SnO2 sensors: Current status and future prospects, Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical, 1995, 26: 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Liu H C, Tan Y, Baček T, et al., Fast extremum seeking control for a class of generalized Hammerstein systems with the knowledge of relative degree, 2023 American Control Conference (ACC), San Diego, 2023.

  20. Khalil H K, Nonlinear Systems, Prentice Hall, Hoboken, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Gupta R K, Alqahtani F K, Dawood O M, et al, Suspended graphene arrays for gas sensing applications, 2D Materials, 2020, 8: 025006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Gardner J W, A non-linear diffusion-reaction model of electrical conduction in semiconductor gas sensors, Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical, 1990, 1: 166–170.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Vasiljevic L K and Khalil H K, Error bounds in differentiation of noisy signals by high-gain observers, Systems & Control Letters, 2008, 57: 856–862.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  24. Ariyur K B and Krstic M, Analysis and design of multivariable extremum seeking, Proceedings of the 2002 American Control Conference, Anchorage, 2002.

  25. Ghaffari A, Krstić M, and Nešić D, Multivariable Newton-based extremum seeking, Automatica, 2012, 48: 1759–1767.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  26. Liu X M and Lin Z L, Robust hybrid zero-order optimization algorithms with acceleration via averaging in time, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 2011, 56: 239–253.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  27. Levant A, Robust exact differentiation via sliding mode technique, Automatica, 1998, 34: 379–384.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  28. Wang X and Lin H, Design and frequency analysis of continuous finite-time-convergent differentiator, Aerospace Science and Technology, 2012, 18: 69–78.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  29. Nešić D and Dower P, A note on input-to-state stability and averaging of systems with inputs, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 2001, 46: 1760–1765.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  30. Teel A R and Nešić D, Averaging with disturbances and closeness of solutions, Systems & Ccontrol Letters, 2000, 40: 317–323.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  31. Teel A R, Moreau L, and Nešić D, A unified framework for input-to-state stability in systems with two time scales, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 2003, 48: 1526–1544.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  32. Tan Y, Nešić D, and Mareels I, On non-local stability properties of extremum seeking control, IFAC Proceedings Volumes, 2005, 38(1): 550–555.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hengchang Liu.

Ethics declarations

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Additional information

This work was supported by the Australian Research Council Discovery under Grant No. DP200102402.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liu, H., Tan, Y. & Oetomo, D. A Novel Extremum Seeking Control to Enhance Convergence and Robustness in the Presence of Nonlinear Dynamic Sensors. J Syst Sci Complex 37, 3–21 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11424-024-3447-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11424-024-3447-y

Keywords

Navigation