Skip to main content
Log in

Physics-Informed Neural Networks with Two Weighted Loss Function Methods for Interactions of Two-Dimensional Oceanic Internal Solitary Waves

  • Published:
Journal of Systems Science and Complexity Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The multiple patterns of internal solitary wave interactions (ISWI) are a complex oceanic phenomenon. Satellite remote sensing techniques indirectly detect these ISWI, but do not provide information on their detailed structure and dynamics. Recently, the authors considered a three-layer fluid with shear flow and developed a (2+1) Kadomtsev-Petviashvili (KP) model that is capable of describing five types of oceanic ISWI, including O-type, P-type, TO-type, TP-type, and Y-shaped. Deep learning models, particularly physics-informed neural networks (PINN), are widely used in the field of fluids and internal solitary waves. However, the authors find that the amplitude of internal solitary waves is much smaller than the wavelength and the ISWI occur at relatively large spatial scales, and these characteristics lead to an imbalance in the loss function of the PINN model. To solve this problem, the authors introduce two weighted loss function methods, the fixed weighing and the adaptive weighting methods, to improve the PINN model. This successfully simulated the detailed structure and dynamics of ISWI, with simulation results corresponding to the satellite images. In particular, the adaptive weighting method can automatically update the weights of different terms in the loss function and outperforms the fixed weighting method in terms of generalization ability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Boegman L and Stastna M, Sediment resuspension and transport by internal solitary waves, Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics, 2019, 51): 129–154.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Alford M H, Peacock T, MacKinnon J A, et al., The formation and fate of internal waves in the South China Sea, Nature, 2015, 521(7550): 65–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Cavaliere D, la Forgia G, Adduce C, et al., Breaking location of internal solitary waves over a sloping seabed, Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 2021, 126(2): e2020JC016669.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Ferrari R and Wunsch C, Ocean circulation kinetic energy: Reservoirs, sources, and sinks, Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics, 2009, 41): 253–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Yuan C, Pan L, Gao Z, et al., Combined effect of topography and rotation on oblique internal solitary wave-wave interactions, Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 2023, 128(6): e2023JC019634.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Wang Z, Wang Z, and Yuan C, Oceanic internal solitary waves in three-layer fluids of great depth, Acta Mechanica Sinica, 2022, 38(2): 321473.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Xue J, Graber H C, Romeiser R, et al., Understanding internal wave-wave interaction patterns observed in satellite images of the Mid-Atlantic Bight, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2014, 52(6): 3211–3219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kodama Y, Young diagrams and N-soliton solutions of the KP equation, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General, 2004, 37(46): 11169.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Ablowitz M J and Baldwin D E, Nonlinear shallow ocean-wave soliton interactions on flat beaches, Physical Review E, 2012, 86(3): 036305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Guo L, Chen L, Mihalache D, et al., Dynamics of soliton interaction solutions of the Davey-Stewartson I equation, Physical Review E, 2022, 105(1): 014218.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Chen G Y, Liu C T, Wang Y H, et al., Interaction and generation of long-crested internal solitary waves in the South China Sea, Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 2011, 116(C6), DOI: https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JC006392.

  12. Zheng Q, Klemas V, Yan X H, et al., Digital orthorectification of space shuttle coastal ocean photographs, International Journal of Remote Sensing, 1997, 18(1): 197–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Alpers W, Wang-Chen H, and Hock L, Observation of internal waves in the Andaman Sea by ERS SAR, IGARSS’97, 1997 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium Proceedings, Remote Sensing — A Scientific Vision for Sustainable Development, 1997, 4): 1518–1520.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Cui J, Dong S, and Wang Z, Study on applicability of internal solitary wave theories by theoretical and numerical method, Applied Ocean Research, 2021, 111): 102629.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Grimshaw R H J, Smyth N F, and Stepanyants Y A, Interaction of internal solitary waves with long periodic waves within the rotation modified Benjamin-Ono equation, Physica D: Nonlinear-Phenomena, 2021, 419): 132867.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Bokaeeyan M, Ankiewicz A, and Akhmediev N, Bright and dark rogue internal waves: The Gardner equation approach, Physical Review E, 2019, 99(6): 062224.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. Sun J, Tang X, and Chen Y, Oceanic internal solitary wave interactions via the KP equation in a three-layer fluid with shear flow, 2023, arXiv: 2311.07990.

  18. Hornik K, Stinchcombe M, and White H, Multilayer feedforward networks are universal approximators, Neural Networks, 1989, 2(5): 359–366.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Raissi M, Perdikaris P, and Karniadakis G E, Physics-informed neural networks: A deep learning framework for solving forward and inverse problems involving nonlinear partial differential equations, Journal of Computational Physics, 2019, 378): 686–707.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. Wang L and Yan Z, Data-driven rogue waves and parameter discovery in the defocusing nonlinear Schrödinger equation with a potential using the PINN deep learning, Physics Letters A, 2021, 404): 127408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Sheng C, Wang L, Huang Z, et al., Transformer-based deep learning network for tooth segmentation on panoramic radiographs, Journal of Systems Science & Complexity, 2023, 36(1): 257–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Tian S, Niu Z, and Li B, Mix-training physics-informed neural networks for high-order rogue waves of cmKdV equation, Nonlinear Dynamics, 2023, 111(17): 16467–16482.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Zhu Q, Liu Z, and Yan J, Machine learning for metal additive manufacturing: Predicting temperature and melt pool fluid dynamics using physics-informed neural networks, Computational Mechanics, 2021, 67): 619–635.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  24. Zhong M and Yan Z, Data-driven forward and inverse problems for chaotic and hyperchaotic dynamic systems based on two machine learning architectures, Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena, 2023, 446): 133656.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  25. Raissi M, Yazdani A, and Karniadakis G E, Hidden fluid mechanics: Learning velocity and pressure fields from flow visualizations, Science, 2020, 367(6481): 1026–1030.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  26. Mao Z, Jagtap A D, and Karniadakis G E, Physics-informed neural networks for high-speed flows, Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 2020, 360): 112789.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  27. Cai S, Mao Z, Wang Z, et al., Physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) for fluid mechanics: A review, Acta Mechanica Sinica, 2021, 37(12): 1727–1738.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  28. Pan X, Wang J, Zhang X, et al., A deep-learning model for the amplitude inversion of internal waves based on optical remote-sensing images, International Journal of Remote Sensing, 2018, 39(3): 607–618.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Zhang X and Li X, Satellite data-driven and knowledge-informed machine learning model for estimating global internal solitary wave speed, Remote Sensing of Environment, 2022, 283): 113328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Liang K, Zhang M, Li Z X, et al., A new method to estimate the speed of internal solitary waves based on a single optical remote sensing image, International Journal of Remote Sensing, 2022, 43(17): 6430–6444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Zhang M, Hu H, Du P, et al., Detection of an internal solitary wave by the underwater vehicle based on machine learning, Physics of Fluids, 2022, 34(11): 115137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Wang S, Yu X, and Perdikaris P, When and why PINNs fail to train: A neural tangent kernel perspective, Journal of Computational Physics, 2022, 449): 110768.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  33. Goswami S, Anitescu C, Chakraborty S, et al., Transfer learning enhanced physics informed neural network for phase-field modeling of fracture, Theoretical and Applied Fracture Mechanics, 2020, 106): 102447.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Pang G, Lu L, and Karniadakis G E, fPINNs: Fractional physics-informed neural networks, SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing, 2019, 41(4): A2603–A2626.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  35. Yang L, Meng X, and Karniadakis G E, B-PINNs: Bayesian physics-informed neural networks for forward and inverse PDE problems with noisy data, Journal of Computational Physics, 2021, 425): 109913.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  36. Jin X, Cai S, Li H, et al., NSFnets (Navier-Stokes flow nets): Physics-informed neural networks for the incompressible Navier-Stokes equations, Journal of Computational Physics, 2021, 426): 109951.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  37. Lin S and Chen Y, A two-stage physics-informed neural network method based on conserved quantities and applications in localized wave solutions, Journal of Computational Physics, 2022, 457): 111053.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  38. Lin S and Chen Y, Physics-informed neural network methods based on Miura transformations and discovery of new localized wave solutions, Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena, 2023, 445): 133629.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  39. Miao Z and Chen Y, VC-PINN: Variable coefficient physics-informed neural network for forward and inverse problems of PDEs with variable coefficient, Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena, 2023, 133945.

  40. An atlas of internal solitary-like waves and their properties, http://www.internalwaveatlas.com/.

  41. Xiang Z, Peng W, Liu X, et al., Self-adaptive loss balanced physics-informed neural networks, Neurocomputing, 2022, 496): 11–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Dr. Zhengwu Miao for his kindly support and help.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xiaoyan Tang.

Ethics declarations

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Additional information

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant Nos. 12275085, 12235007, and 12175069, and Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality under Grant Nos. 21JC1402500 and 22DZ2229014.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sun, J., Chen, Y. & Tang, X. Physics-Informed Neural Networks with Two Weighted Loss Function Methods for Interactions of Two-Dimensional Oceanic Internal Solitary Waves. J Syst Sci Complex 37, 545–566 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11424-024-3500-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11424-024-3500-x

Keywords