Skip to main content
Log in

Multivariable direct adaptive decoupling controller using multiple models and a case study

  • Special Focus
  • Published:
Science in China Series F: Information Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, a multivariable direct adaptive controller using multiple models without minimum phase assumption is presented to improve the transient response when the parameters of the system jump abruptly. The controller is composed of multiple fixed controller models, a free-running adaptive controller model and a re-initialized adaptive controller model. The fixed controller models are derived from the corresponding fixed system models directly. The adaptive controller models adopt the direct adaptive algorithm to reduce the design calculation. At every instant, the optimal controller is chosen out according to the switching index. The interaction of the system is viewed as the measured disturbance which is eliminated by the choice of the weighing polynomial matrix. The global convergence is obtained. Finally, several simulation examples in a wind tunnel experiment are given to show both effectiveness and practicality of the proposed method. The significance of the proposed method is that it is applicable to a non-minimum phase system, adopting direct adaptive algorithm to overcome the singularity problem during the matrix calculation and realizing decoupling control for a multivariable system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Astrom K J, Wittenmark B. On self-tuning regulators. Automatica, 1973, 9(2): 195–199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Goodwin G C, Hill D J, Palaniswami M. A perspective on convergence of adaptive control algorithms. Automatica, 1984, 20(5): 519–531

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Lainiotis D G. Partitioning a unifying framework for adaptive system. I: Estimation. Proc IEEE, 1976, 64(8): 1126–1143

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Athans M, Castanon D, Dunn K, et al. The stochastic control of the F-8C aircraft using a multiple model adaptive control (MMAC) method part I: Equilibrium flight. IEEE Trans Autom Control, 1977, 22(5): 768–780

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Fu M Y, Barmish B R. Adaptive stabilization of linear systems via switching control. IEEE Trans Autom Control, 1986, 31(12): 1097–1103

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Middleton R H, Goodwin G C, Hilland D J, et al. Design issues in adptive control. IEEE Trans Autom Control, 1988, 33(1): 50–58

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Narendra K S, Balakrishnan J. Improving transient response of adaptive control systems using multiple models and switching. IEEE Trans Autom Control, 1994, 39(9): 1861–1866

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Narendra K S, Balakrishnan J, Ciliz M K. Adaptation and learning using multiple models, switching and tuning. IEEE Control Syst Mag, 1995, 15(3): 37–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Narendra K S, Balakrishnan J. Adaptive control using multiple models. IEEE Trans Autom Control, 1997, 42(2): 171–187

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Narendra K S, Xiang C. Adaptive control of discrete-time systems using multiple models. IEEE Trans Autom Control, 2000, 45(9): 1669–1686

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Wittenmark B, Astrom K J. Practical issues in the implementation of self-tuning control. Automatica, 1984, 20(5): 595–605

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Wang X, Li S Y, Cai W J, et al. Multi-model direct adaptive decoupling control with application to the wind tunnel. ISA Trans, 2005, 44(1): 131–143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Clark D W. Self-tuning control of nonminimum-phase systems. Automatica, 1984, 20(3): 501–517

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Goodwin G C, Ramadge P J, Caines P E. Discrete-time multivariable adaptive control. IEEE Trans Autom Control, 1980, 25(3): 449–456

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Zhang G J, Chai T Y, Shao C. A synthetic approach for control of intermittent wind tunnel. In: Proceedings of the American Control Conference, New Mexico, 1997. 203–207

  16. Yu W, Zhang G J. Modelling and controller design for 2.4 m injector powered transonic wind tunnel. In: Proceedings of the American Control Conference, New Mexico, 1997. 1544–1545

  17. Nelson D M. Wind tunnel computer control system and instrumentation. In: The 35th International Instrumentation Symposium, Orlando. 1989. 87–101

  18. Pels A F. Closed-loop Mach number control in a transonic wind tunnel. Journal A, 1989, 30(1): 25–32

    Google Scholar 

  19. Soeterboek R A M, Pels A F, Verbruggen H B, et al. A predictive controller for the Mach number in a transonic wind tunnel. IEEE Control Syst Mag, 1991, 11(1): 63–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Motter M A, Principe J C. Neural control of the NASA Langley 16-foot transonic tunnel. In: Proceedings of the American Control Conference, New Mexico, 1997. 662–663

  21. CARDC. Measurement and Control System Design in High and Low Speed Wind Tunnel (in Chinese). Beijing: National Defence Industry Press, 2002

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xin Wang.

Additional information

Supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 60504010, 60864004), the National High-Tech Research and Development Program of China (Grant No. 2008AA04Z129), the Key Project of Chinese Ministry of Education (Grant No. 208071), and the Natural Science Foundation of Jiangxi Province (Grant No. 0611006)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wang, X., Yang, H. & Zheng, Y. Multivariable direct adaptive decoupling controller using multiple models and a case study. Sci. China Ser. F-Inf. Sci. 52, 1165–1176 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11432-009-0128-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11432-009-0128-3

Keywords

Navigation