Skip to main content
Log in

Formation control for networked spacecraft in deep space: with or without communication delays and with switching topology

  • Research Papers
  • Special Focus
  • Published:
Science China Information Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, several formation controllers are developed with constant and variable connected communication topology for six-degree-of-freedom (6-DOF) networked spacecraft flying in deep space with constant and time-varying communication delays considered. In the control algorithm, any explicit leader does not exist in the formation team and it is required that each spacecraft communicate only with its neighbors and therefore the required communication loads of the whole formation is greatly reduced. The proposed control strategies allow that each spacecraft can track its desired position and attitude and simultaneously the whole group moves to the desired formation and obtain its desired relative attitudes with its neighbors. Simulation results demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed controllers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Das A, Cobb R, Stallard M. TechSat 21: a revolutionary concept in distributed space based sensing. In: Proc AIAA Defense and Civil Space Programs Conference and Exhibit, Huntsville, AL, USA, 1998. AIAA-98-5255

  2. Folta D, Quinn D. Enhanced formation flying for the Earth-observing-1 (EO-1) new millennium mission. In: Proc Flight Mechanics Symposium, Greenbelt, MD, USA, 1997. 405–406

  3. Lindensmith C. Terrestrial planet finder: technology development plans and progress. In: Proc IEEE Aerospace Conference. Big Sky, MT, USA, 2004. 4186–4189

  4. Danzmann K, LISA Study Team. Lisa: Laser Interferometry Space Antenna for the detection and observation of gravitational wave. Max-Planck Institutfür Quantenoptik, 2nd ed., 1998

  5. Yedavalli K R, Sparks G A. Satellite formation flying control design based on hybrid control system stability analysis. In: Proc American Control Conference, Chicago, Il, USA, 2000. 2210–2214

  6. Fridlund C V M, Capaccioni F. Infrared space interferometry-the DARWIN mission. Adv Space Res, 2002, 30: 2135–2145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Scharf D P, Hadaegh F Y, Ploen S R. A survey of spacecraft formation flying guidance and control (Part II): Control. In: Proc American Control Conference. Boston, Ma, USA, 2004. 2976–2985

  8. Smith S R, Subbotin M V, Hadaegh Y F. Decentralized estimation and control in high precision spacecraft formations: comparison studies. In: Proceedings of IEEE Aerospace Conference. Big Sky, MT, 2007. 1–11

  9. Krogstad T R, Gravdahl J T. 6-DOF mutual synchronization of formation flying spacecraft. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, San Diego, CA, USA, 2006. 5706–5711

  10. Hu J, Hong Y, Gao L. Tracking control for multi-agent consensus with an active leader and variable topology. Automata, 2006, 42: 1177–1182

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Mesbahi M, Hadegh F Y. Formation flying of multiple spacecraft via graphs, matrix inequalities and switching. AIAA J Guid Control Dyn, 2000, 24: 369–377

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Lin Z Y, Francis B, Maggiore M. Necessary and sufficient graphical conditions for formation control of unicycles. IEEE Trans Autom Control, 2005, 50: 121–127

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Jadbabaie A, Lin J, Morse A S. Coordination of groups of mobile autonomous agents using nearest neighbor rules. IEEE Trans Autom Control, 2003, 48: 988–1001

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Ren W. Distributed attitude alignment in spacecraft formation flying. Int J Adapt Control Signal Process, 2007, 21: 95–113

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Ren W, Beard R W. Consensus seeking in multiagent systems under dynamically changing interaction topologies. IEEE Trans Autom Control, 2005, 50: 655–661

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Olfati-Saber R, Murray R. Consensus problems in networks of agents with switching topology and time-delays. IEEE Trans Autom Control, 2004, 49: 1520–1533

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. Amano M, Luo Z W, Hosoe S. Graph-dependent sufficient conditions for synchronization of networked coupled system with time-delay. Trans SICE, 2004, 40: 925–933

    Google Scholar 

  18. Hu J, Hong Y. Leader-following coordination of multi-agent systems with coupling time delays. Phys A, 2007, 374: 853–863

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Godcil C, Royle G. Algebraic graph theory. In: Ser. Springer Graduate Texts in Mathematics 207. New York: Springer, 2001

    Google Scholar 

  20. Chung F R K. Spectral graph theory. In: Regional Conference Series in Mathematics. RI Providence: American Mathematical Society, 1997

    Google Scholar 

  21. Cairano D S, Pasini A, Bemporad A, et al. Convergence properties of dynamic agents consensus networks with broken links. In: Proc American Control Conference, Seattle, WA, USA, 2008. 1362–1367

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nan Wang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wang, N., Zhang, T. & Xu, J. Formation control for networked spacecraft in deep space: with or without communication delays and with switching topology. Sci. China Inf. Sci. 54, 469–481 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11432-011-4191-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11432-011-4191-1

Keywords

Navigation