Skip to main content
Log in

Effective bias reduction methods for passive source localization using TDOA and GROA

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
Science China Information Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

    We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

    Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Abstract

For passive source localization based on both TDOA and GROA, this paper proposes two bias reduction methods for the well-known Weighted-Least-Squares (WLS) estimator. We first derive the passive source localization bias from the two-step algebraic closed-form solution. This bias is found to be considerably larger than the Maximum Likelihood Estimator (MLE) and limits the WLS estimator’s practical applications. In this paper, We develop two methods to reduce the bias. The first one called Bias-Subtraction-Method (BSM) directly subtracts the expected bias from the solution of the WLS estimator, and the second one called Bias-Reduction-Method (BRM) imposes a constraint to the equation error formulation to improve the source location estimate. The noise covariance matrix must be known exactly in calculating the expected bias in BSM, and we only need to know the structure of it in BRM. For far-field sources localization when the noise is Gaussian and not too large, both of the two proposed methods can reduce the localization bias effectively and achieve the Cramér-Rao Lower Bound (CRLB) performance very well, and the BRM almost has the same performance as the MLE estimator. Simulations corroborate the performance of the two proposed methods.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ho K C, Sun M. Passive source localization using time differences of arrival and gain ratios of arrival. IEEE Trans Signal Process, 2008, 56: 464–477

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Hao B, Li Z, Si J, et al. Passive multiple disjoint sources localization using TDOAs and GROAs in the presence of sensor location uncertainties. In: Proceedings of IEEE Internatioal Conference on Communications, Ottawa, 2012. 47–52

    Google Scholar 

  3. Jajamovich G H, Wang X. Joint multitarget tracking and sensor localization in collaborative sensor networks. IEEE Trans Aerosp Electron Syst, 2011, 47: 2361–2375

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Wang B, He Y, Wang G, et al. Optimal allocation of multi-sensor passive localization. Sci China Inf Sci, 2010, 53: 2514–2526

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Bilik I, Adhikari K, Buck J R. Shannon capacity bound on mobile station localization accuracy in urban environments. IEEE Trans Signal Process, 2011, 59: 6206–6216

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Wang Z, Zekavat, Seyeda A. Omnidirectional mobile NLOS identification and localization via multiple cooperative nodes. IEEE Trans Mob Comput, 2012, 11: 2047–2059

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Tsalolikhin E, Bilk I, Blaunstein N. A single-base-station localization approach using a statistical model of the NLOS propagation conditions in urban terrain. IEEE Trans Veh Technol, 2011, 60: 1124–1137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Ren M, Zou Y. A novel multiple sparse source localization using triangular pyramid microphone array. IEEE Signal Process Lett, 2012, 19: 83–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Canclini A, Antonacci F, Sarti A, et al. Acoustic source localization with distributed asynchronous microphone networks. IEEE Trans Speech Audio Process, 2013, 21: 439–443

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Chen T, Liu C, Zakharov Y V. Source localization using matched-phase matched-field processing with phase descent search. IEEE J Ocean Eng, 2012, 37: 261–270

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Blatt D, Hero A O. Energy-based sensor network source localization via projection onto convex sets. IEEE Trans Signal Process, 2006, 54: 3614–3619

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Cui W, Cao Z, Wei J. Dual-microphone source location method in 2-D space. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing, Toulouse, 2006. IV:845–IV:848

    Google Scholar 

  13. Barton R J, Rao D. Performance capabilities of long-range UWB-IR TDOA localization systems. EURASIP J Adv Signal Process, 2008, 2008: 1–17

    Google Scholar 

  14. Dogancay K. Bias compensation for the bearings-only pseudolinear target track estimator. IEEE Trans Signal Process, 2006, 54: 59–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Ho K C. Bias reduction for an explicit solution of source localization using TDOA. IEEE Trans Signal Process, 2012, 60: 2101–2114

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Chan Y T, Ho K C. A simple and efficient estimator for hyperbolic location. IEEE Trans Signal Process, 1994, 42: 1905–1915

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Moon T K, Stirling W C. Mathematical Methods and Algorithms for Signal Processing. Upper Saddle River: Prentice-Hall, 2000

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to BenJian Hao.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hao, B., Li, Z., Qi, P. et al. Effective bias reduction methods for passive source localization using TDOA and GROA. Sci. China Inf. Sci. 56, 1–12 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11432-013-4896-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11432-013-4896-4

Keywords