Skip to main content
Log in

The propositional normal default logic and the finite/infinite injury priority method

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
Science China Information Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In propositional normal default logic, given a default theory (Δ,D) and a well-defined ordering of D, there is a method to construct an extension of (Δ,D) without any injury. To construct a strong extension of (Δ,D) given a well-defined ordering of D, there may be finite injuries for a default δD. With approximation deduction ⊢s in propositional logic, we will show that to construct an extension of (Δ,D) under a given welldefined ordering of D, there may be infinite injuries for some default δD.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Friedberg R M. Two recursively enumerable sets of incomparable degrees of unsolvability. Proc Natl Acad Sci, 1957, 43: 236–238

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Muchnik A A. On the separability of recursively enumerable sets (in Russian). Dokl Akad Nauk SSSR, 1956, 109: 29–32

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Rogers H. Theory of Recursive Functions and Effective Computability. Cambridge: The MIT Press, 1967

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Soare R I. Recursively Enumerable Sets and Degrees, a Study of Computable Functions and Computably Generated Sets. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1987

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Marek W, Truszczynski M. Nonmonotonic Logics: Context-Dependent Reasoning. Berlin: Springer. 1993

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Nicolas P, Saubion F, Stéphan I. Heuristics for a default logic reasoning system. Int J Artif Intell Tools, 2001, 10: 503–523

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Antoniou G. A tutorial on default logics. ACM Comput Surv, 1999, 31: 337–359

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Delgrande J P, Schaub T, Jackson W K. Alternative approaches to default logic. Artif Intell, 1994, 70: 167–237

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Lukaszewicz W. Considerations on default logic: an alternative approach. Comput Intell, 1988, 4: 1–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Reiter R. A logic for default reasoning. Artif Intell, 1980, 13: 81–132

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Avron A, Lev I. Canonical propositional Gentzen-type systems. In: Proceedings of the 1st International Joint Conference on Automated Reasoning. London: Springer, 2001. 529–544

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Li W. Mathematical Logic, Foundations for Information Science. Basel: Birkhäuser. 2010

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Li W, Sui Y, Sun M. The sound and complete R-calculus for revising propositional theories. Sci China Inf Sci, 2015, 58: 092101

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Li W, Sui Y. The R-calculus and the finite injury priority method. In: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Vancouver, 2015

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by Open Fund of the State Key Laboratory of Software Development Environment (Grant No. SKLSDE-2010KF-06), Beihang University, and National Basic Research Program of China (973 Program) (Grant No. 2005CB321901).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yuhui Wang.

Additional information

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, W., Sui, Y. & Wang, Y. The propositional normal default logic and the finite/infinite injury priority method. Sci. China Inf. Sci. 60, 092107 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11432-016-0551-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11432-016-0551-5

Keywords

Navigation